Backend To Frontend Handoff Docs

作者 softaworks3027f20f3181无许可证2.5K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库7个月前更新

Create API handoff documentation for frontend developers. Use when backend work is complete and needs to be documented for frontend integration, or user says 'create handoff', 'document API', 'frontend handoff', or 'API documentation'.

AI 生成的概览

生成结构化的 API 交接文档,供前端开发者集成已完成的后端功能。

功能
将已完成的后端 API 工作整理为一份 markdown 交接文档,涵盖业务背景、接口、DTO、枚举、校验规则、边界情况、集成说明和测试场景。文档写入带版本号的交接文件路径,不在对话中输出内容。该技能仅为指令,不附带脚本。
适用场景
适用于后端 API 工作(如接口、DTO、校验或业务逻辑)已完成并需要为前端集成编写文档时。也适用于“创建交接”“编写 API 文档”或“前端交接”等请求。
运行要求
无需脚本或软件包,由智能体将 markdown 文件写入项目路径。需要以已完成的 API 代码和相关业务背景作为输入。

API Handoff Mode

No Chat Output: Produce the handoff document only. No discussion, no explanation—just the markdown block saved to the handoff file.

You are a backend developer completing API work. Your task is to produce a structured handoff document that gives frontend developers (or their AI) full business and technical context to build integration/UI without needing to ask backend questions.

When to use: After completing backend API work—endpoints, DTOs, validation, business logic—run this mode to generate handoff documentation.

Simple API shortcut: If the API is straightforward (CRUD, no complex business logic, obvious validation), skip the full template—just provide the endpoint, method, and example request/response JSON. Frontend can infer the rest.

Goal

Produce a copy-paste-ready handoff document with all context a frontend AI needs to build UI/integration correctly and confidently.

Inputs

  • Completed API code (endpoints, controllers, services, DTOs, validation).
  • Related business context from the task/user story.
  • Any constraints, edge cases, or gotchas discovered during implementation.

Workflow

  1. Collect context — confirm feature name, relevant endpoints, DTOs, auth rules, and edge cases.
  2. Create/update handoff file — write the document to .claude/docs/ai/<feature-name>/api-handoff.md. Increment the iteration suffix (-v2, -v3, …) if rerunning after feedback.
  3. Paste template — fill every section below with concrete data. Omit subsections only when truly not applicable (note why).
  4. Double-check — ensure payloads match actual API behavior, auth scopes are accurate, and enums/validation reflect backend logic.

Output Format

Produce a single markdown block structured as follows. Keep it dense—no fluff, no repetition.


markdown
# API Handoff: [Feature Name]
## Business Context[2-4 sentences: What problem does this solve? Who uses it? Why does it matter? Include any domain terms the frontend needs to understand.]
## Endpoints
### [METHOD] /path/to/endpoint- **Purpose**: [1 line: what it does]- **Auth**: [required role/permission, or "public"]- **Request**:  ```json  {    "field": "type — description, constraints"  }
  • Response (success):
    json
    {  "field": "type — description"}
  • Response (error): [HTTP codes and shapes, e.g., 422 validation, 404 not found]
  • Notes: [edge cases, rate limits, pagination, sorting, anything non-obvious]

[Repeat for each endpoint]

Data Models / DTOs

[List key models/DTOs the frontend will receive or send. Include field types, nullability, enums, and business meaning.]

typescript
// Example shape for frontend typinginterface ExampleDto {  id: number;  status: 'pending' | 'approved' | 'rejected';  createdAt: string; // ISO 8601}

Enums & Constants

[List any enums, status codes, or magic values the frontend needs to know. Include display labels if relevant.]

ValueMeaningDisplay Label
pendingAwaiting reviewPending

Validation Rules

[Summarize key validation rules the frontend should mirror for UX—required fields, min/max, formats, conditional rules.]

Business Logic & Edge Cases

  • [Bullet each non-obvious behavior, constraint, or gotcha]
  • [e.g., "User can only submit once per day", "Soft-deleted items excluded by default"]

Integration Notes

  • Recommended flow: [e.g., "Fetch list → select item → submit form → poll for status"]
  • Optimistic UI: [safe or not, why]
  • Caching: [any cache headers, invalidation triggers]
  • Real-time: [websocket events, polling intervals if applicable]

Test Scenarios

[Key scenarios frontend should handle—happy path, errors, edge cases. Use as acceptance criteria or test cases.]

  1. Happy path: [brief description]
  2. Validation error: [what triggers it, expected response]
  3. Not found: [when 404 is returned]
  4. Permission denied: [when 403 is returned]

Open Questions / TODOs

[Anything unresolved, pending PM decision, or needs frontend input. If none, omit section.]


---
## Rules- **NO CHAT OUTPUT**—produce only the handoff markdown block, nothing else.- Be precise: types, constraints, examples—not vague prose.- Include real example payloads where helpful.- Surface non-obvious behaviors—don't assume frontend will "just know."- If backend made trade-offs or assumptions, document them.- Keep it scannable: headers, tables, bullets, code blocks.- No backend implementation details (no file paths, class names, internal services) unless directly relevant to integration.- If something is incomplete or TBD, say so explicitly.
## After GeneratingWrite the final markdown into the handoff file only—do not echo it in chat. (If the platform requires confirmation, reference the file path instead of pasting contents.)

来源与署名

来源:softaworks/agent-toolkit位于skills/backend-to-frontend-handoff-docs提交3027f20

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架