Guidelines Advisor

作者 trailofbits82fe82262526无许可证7.4K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库昨天更新

Smart contract development advisor based on Trail of Bits' best practices. Analyzes codebase to generate documentation/specifications, review architecture, check upgradeability patterns, assess implementation quality, identify pitfalls, review dependencies, and evaluate testing. Use when asking whether a smart contract project follows development best practices, reviewing on-chain/off-chain split, upgradeability, or delegatecall proxy patterns against guidelines, or seeking recommendations on contract design, inheritance, events, documentation, dependencies, or test strategy.

AI 生成的概览

依据 Trail of Bits 开发准则分析智能合约代码库,并给出按优先级排序的改进建议。

功能
该技能让智能合约项目经历五个阶段:代码库探查、文档生成、架构分析、实现审查和建议。它评估十一个方面,包括文档、链上与链下计算、可升级性、delegatecall 代理模式、函数组合、继承、事件、常见陷阱、依赖、测试以及平台特定指导。它会产出通俗英文的系统说明、架构图、文档缺口分析,以及按 CRITICAL、HIGH、MEDIUM、LOW 分级并附文件引用的发现清单。
适用场景
当你想知道某个智能合约项目是否遵循既定的开发最佳实践时使用。它适用于审查链上与链下的划分、可升级性方案和 delegatecall 代理模式,也适用于就合约设计、继承、事件、文档、依赖或测试策略寻求建议。
运行要求
仅为说明性内容,不附带脚本。需要访问目标代码库;可选用 Slither 等工具生成 Solidity 架构图和进行可升级性检查,但没有这些工具也能运行。

Guidelines Advisor

Purpose

Systematically analyzes the codebase and provides guidance based on Trail of Bits' development guidelines:

  1. Generate documentation and specifications (plain English descriptions, architectural diagrams, code documentation)
  2. Optimize on-chain/off-chain architecture (only if applicable)
  3. Review upgradeability patterns (if your project has upgrades)
  4. Check delegatecall/proxy implementations (if present)
  5. Assess implementation quality (functions, inheritance, events)
  6. Identify common pitfalls
  7. Review dependencies
  8. Evaluate test suite and suggest improvements

Framework: Building Secure Contracts - Development Guidelines


How This Works

Phase 1: Discovery & Context

Explores the codebase to understand:

  • Project structure and platform
  • Contract/module files and their purposes
  • Existing documentation
  • Architecture patterns (proxies, upgrades, etc.)
  • Testing setup
  • Dependencies

Phase 2: Documentation Generation

Helps create:

  • Plain English system description
  • Architectural diagrams (using Slither printers for Solidity)
  • Code documentation recommendations (NatSpec for Solidity)

Phase 3: Architecture Analysis

Analyzes:

  • On-chain vs off-chain component distribution (if applicable)
  • Upgradeability approach (if applicable)
  • Delegatecall proxy patterns (if present)

Phase 4: Implementation Review

Assesses:

  • Function composition and clarity
  • Inheritance structure
  • Event logging practices
  • Common pitfalls presence
  • Dependencies quality
  • Testing coverage and techniques

Phase 5: Recommendations

Provides:

  • Prioritized improvement suggestions
  • Best practice guidance
  • Actionable next steps

Assessment Areas

I analyze 11 comprehensive areas covering all aspects of smart contract development. For detailed criteria, best practices, and specific checks, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md [blocked].

Quick Reference:

  1. Documentation & Specifications

    • Plain English system descriptions
    • Architectural diagrams
    • NatSpec completeness (Solidity)
    • Documentation gaps identification
  2. On-Chain vs Off-Chain Computation

    • Complexity analysis
    • Gas optimization opportunities
    • Verification vs computation patterns
  3. Upgradeability

    • Migration vs upgradeability trade-offs
    • Data separation patterns
    • Upgrade procedure documentation
  4. Delegatecall Proxy Pattern

    • Storage layout consistency
    • Initialization patterns
    • Function shadowing risks
    • Slither upgradeability checks
  5. Function Composition

    • Function size and clarity
    • Logical grouping
    • Modularity assessment
  6. Inheritance

    • Hierarchy depth/width
    • Diamond problem risks
    • Inheritance visualization
  7. Events

    • Critical operation coverage
    • Event naming consistency
    • Indexed parameters
  8. Common Pitfalls

    • Reentrancy patterns
    • Integer overflow/underflow
    • Access control issues
    • Platform-specific vulnerabilities
  9. Dependencies

    • Library quality assessment
    • Version management
    • Dependency manager usage
    • Copied code detection
  10. Testing & Verification

    • Coverage analysis
    • Fuzzing techniques
    • Formal verification
    • CI/CD integration
  11. Platform-Specific Guidance

    • Solidity version recommendations
    • Compiler warning checks
    • Inline assembly warnings
    • Platform-specific tools

For complete details on each area including what I'll check, analyze, and recommend, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md [blocked].


Example Output

When the analysis is complete, you'll receive comprehensive guidance covering:

  • System documentation with plain English descriptions
  • Architectural diagrams and documentation gaps
  • Architecture analysis (on-chain/off-chain, upgradeability, proxies)
  • Implementation review (functions, inheritance, events, pitfalls)
  • Dependencies and testing evaluation
  • Prioritized recommendations (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
  • Overall assessment and path to production

For a complete example analysis report, see EXAMPLE_REPORT.md [blocked].


Deliverables

I provide four comprehensive deliverable categories:

1. System Documentation

  • Plain English descriptions
  • Architectural diagrams
  • Documentation gaps analysis

2. Architecture Analysis

  • On-chain/off-chain assessment
  • Upgradeability review
  • Proxy pattern security review

3. Implementation Review

  • Function composition analysis
  • Inheritance assessment
  • Events coverage
  • Pitfall identification
  • Dependencies evaluation
  • Testing analysis

4. Prioritized Recommendations

  • CRITICAL (address immediately)
  • HIGH (address before deployment)
  • MEDIUM (address for production quality)
  • LOW (nice to have)

For detailed templates and examples of each deliverable, see DELIVERABLES.md [blocked].


Assessment Process

When invoked, I will:

  1. Explore the codebase

    • Identify all contract/module files
    • Find existing documentation
    • Locate test files
    • Check for proxies/upgrades
    • Identify dependencies
  2. Generate documentation

    • Create plain English system description
    • Generate architectural diagrams (if tools available)
    • Identify documentation gaps
  3. Analyze architecture

    • Assess on-chain/off-chain distribution (if applicable)
    • Review upgradeability approach (if applicable)
    • Audit proxy patterns (if present)
  4. Review implementation

    • Analyze functions, inheritance, events
    • Check for common pitfalls
    • Assess dependencies
    • Evaluate testing
  5. Provide recommendations

    • Present findings with file references
    • Ask clarifying questions about design decisions
    • Suggest prioritized improvements
    • Offer actionable next steps

Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)

RationalizationWhy It's WrongRequired Action
"System is simple, description covers everything"Plain English descriptions miss security-critical detailsComplete all 5 phases: documentation, architecture, implementation, dependencies, recommendations
"No upgrades detected, skip upgradeability section"Upgradeability can be implicit (ownable patterns, delegatecall)Search for proxy patterns, delegatecall, storage collisions before declaring N/A
"Not applicable" without verificationPremature scope reduction misses vulnerabilitiesVerify with explicit codebase search before skipping any guideline section
"Architecture is straightforward, no analysis needed"Obvious architectures have subtle trust boundariesAnalyze on-chain/off-chain distribution, access control flow, external dependencies
"Common pitfalls don't apply to this codebase"Every codebase has common pitfallsSystematically check all guideline pitfalls with grep/code search
"Tests exist, testing guideline is satisfied"Test existence ≠ test qualityCheck coverage, property-based tests, integration tests, failure cases
"I can provide generic best practices"Generic advice isn't actionableProvide project-specific findings with file:line references
"User knows what to improve from findings"Findings without prioritization = no action planGenerate prioritized improvement roadmap with specific next steps

Notes

  • I'll only analyze relevant sections (won't hallucinate about upgrades if not present)
  • I'll adapt to your platform (Solidity, Rust, Cairo, etc.)
  • I'll use available tools (Slither, etc.) but work without them if unavailable
  • I'll provide file references and line numbers for all findings
  • I'll ask questions about design decisions I can't infer from code

Ready to Begin

What I'll need:

  • Access to your codebase
  • Context about your project goals
  • Any existing documentation or specifications
  • Information about deployment plans

Let's analyze your codebase and improve it using Trail of Bits' best practices!

来源与署名

来源:trailofbits/skills位于plugins/building-secure-contracts/skills/guidelines-advisor提交82fe822

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架