Ai Debt Detector

作者 wshobson46891e7e60da无许可证收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日

Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.

AI 生成的概览

审查 AI 生成的代码,找出隐藏债务,如缺少错误处理、资源未释放和虚构依赖。

功能
为 AI 智能体生成的代码提供有针对性的审查清单,涵盖失败模式、孤立资源、边界情况、虚构依赖和架构偏移。它列出需要立即修复的危险信号和常见审查错误。产出是对所审查代码的审计结果,而不是修改后的文件。
适用场景
适用于 AI 代码生成会话之后、合并 AI 编写的拉取请求之前,或代码能运行但显得脆弱时。当错误处理看起来单薄、清理逻辑可疑,或智能体声称完成却未展示验证时也适用。
运行要求
不需要脚本或工具;这是一份仅含指令的清单,由智能体应用于其可读取的代码。

AI Debt Detector

Overview

AI agents generate code that passes the happy path but hides debt: missing error handling, orphaned resources, ignored failure modes, hallucinated packages, silent architectural drift. This skill forces a targeted audit for the exact patterns AI agents get wrong.

When to Use

  • After any AI code generation session (20+ lines produced)
  • Before merging AI-generated PRs
  • When code works but something feels off
  • After vibe-coding sprints where debt accumulates fastest
  • When the agent claims done without showing verification

Process

After code generation, scan for these AI-specific debt patterns:

  1. FAILURE MODES - What happens when this fails?

    • Network timeout? Disk full? Permission denied? Null input?
    • Is there a try/catch? Does it catch SPECIFIC errors or swallow everything?
    • Are resources cleaned up on failure? (streams closed, connections returned, temp files deleted)
  2. ORPHANS - What gets created but never cleaned up?

    • Temp files, event listeners, intervals, subscriptions, connections
    • Are there corresponding cleanup/dispose/close calls for every open/create?
    • In React: does every addEventListener have a removeEventListener in cleanup?
  3. EDGE CASES - What inputs break this?

    • Empty array/string? null/undefined? Multi-MB input? Unicode? Concurrent calls?
    • Does the code assume the happy path? (AI almost always does)
  4. HALLUCINATED DEPS - Do all imports actually exist?

    • Is every package in package.json/requirements.txt?
    • Are API methods real? (AI invents plausible-sounding methods that don't exist)
    • Does this library's latest version still export this function?
  5. ARCHITECTURAL DRIFT - Does this match the project's patterns?

    • Same error handling style as existing code?
    • Uses the project's established utilities (not reinventing)?
    • Follows the file structure convention?

Red Flags (stop and fix immediately)

  • catch (e) {} or catch (e) { console.log(e) } - swallowed error
  • No finally block when resources were opened
  • // TODO: handle error - AI's way of punting
  • Import from a path that doesn't exist in the project
  • Timeout set but no abort/cleanup on timeout
  • Database connection opened but never released back to pool

Common Mistakes

  • Trusting that compilation means correctness (compilation checks syntax, not logic)
  • Reviewing only the diff without checking what the AI did NOT generate (missing error paths)
  • Assuming the AI used the right library version (it often uses deprecated APIs)
  • Skipping the orphan check because garbage collection handles it (it doesn't for connections, listeners, timers)

Why This Exists

AI agents systematically optimize for "looks correct" and "passes the happy path." They miss failure modes, orphan resources, and hallucinate dependencies at rates significantly higher than manual code. This skill forces an audit for those specific blind spots.

来源与署名

来源:wshobson/agents位于plugins/skill-forge-essentials/skills/ai-debt-detector提交46891e7

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架