Review Agent Setup

作者 wshobson46891e7e60da无许可证收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日

Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.

AI 生成的概览

为 AI 代理的审查操作(如 PR 审查、合并和 CI 编辑)设置人工审批门禁和签名审计回执。

功能
该技能提供设置说明,用于将 AI 编码代理的审查类操作(拉取请求审查、评论、合并、议题分类、发布、CI 配置修改、受保护分支推送)置于明确的人工审批之后。它引导完成插件安装、复制 Cedar 策略、创建签名密钥和回执目录,并通过标志文件或斜杠命令开启和关闭审批窗口。获批操作会生成可离线验证的 Ed25519 签名回执,被拒绝的尝试则列为待处理。
适用场景
适用于 Claude Code 代理可能发布 PR 审查、评论、合并、议题更新、发布或 CI 变更,且你需要可审计审批记录的项目。若代理仅进行本地文件编辑和测试运行,则无需使用。
运行要求
需要 Claude Code 及插件安装能力、通过 npx 获取的 protect-mcp 包(0.7.4 版)、用于回执验证的 @veritasacta/verify 包(0.9.2 版)、Node.js,以及用于受控 GitHub 操作的 gh CLI。需要生成的 Ed25519 签名密钥和回执目录,并需要网络访问以获取 npx 包。该技能不附带脚本,仅为说明文档。

review-agent-governance — Setup

Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt.

When to use this plugin

Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent:

  • Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (gh pr review, gh pr merge)
  • Triages issues (gh issue comment, gh issue close)
  • Publishes releases (gh release create)
  • Modifies CI configuration (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml)
  • Pushes to protected branches (main, master, release, production)
  • Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord), once you add a rule for the command that posts (the default policy does not gate them)

If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use protect-mcp for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one.

One-time setup

1. Install the plugin

bash
claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance

2. Copy the default policy to your project

bash
cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \   ./review-governance.cedar

You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See ../agents/review-policy-author.md for guidance on authoring review policies.

3. Create a receipts directory and sign key

bash
mkdir -p ./review-receiptsecho "/review-receipts/" >> .gitignoreecho "/review-governance.key" >> .gitignoreecho "/.review-approved" >> .gitignoreif [ ! -e ./review-governance.key ]; then  d=$(mktemp -d) && npx [email protected] init --dir "$d" && mv "$d/keys/gateway.json" ./review-governance.keyfi

protect-mcp 0.7.4 sign does not create the key, so the last command creates it, and it never replaces an existing key. Without a key, the receipts are unsigned. To rotate the key, archive ./review-governance.key and ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl first, then run the command again. Give auditors the publicKey value from ./review-governance.key. Do not commit the file, because it also holds the private key.

Per-session workflow

The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after.

Flag file (simplest)

bash
# Before the action you want to approvetouch ./.review-approved
# Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge
# Immediately afterrm ./.review-approved

Slash command (from within Claude Code)

/approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X"

This creates ./.review-approved with the given reason embedded as a note, and records the reason in an unsigned approval log under ./review-receipts/approvals/. A follow-up rm is still needed to close the window.

Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation)

If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass:

bash
export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve

Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run.

Verifying the receipts

List all receipts:

bash
ls -la ./review-receipts/

Verify every receipt offline with the public key:

bash
PUB=$(node -p 'JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("./review-governance.key")).publicKey')npx @veritasacta/[email protected] --replay-chain ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB"

Exit 0 means every receipt verified. Exit 1 means a receipt failed verification, because it was tampered with, the key is wrong, or a line is malformed. Exit 2 means the receipts file could not be read.

A denied call never runs, so it has no receipt. To see what the policy blocked, run this inside Claude Code:

/list-pending

It lists the tool calls that the PreToolUse hook blocked in the current session, with the tool name and the command or path.

Example: approving a PR review

bash
# 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment$ /list-pending  Blocked in this session:  - Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'"  - Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'"
# 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it$ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection"  ./.review-approved created
# 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds$ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM"  [receipt appended to ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl, decision=allow]
# 4. Human closes the window$ rm ./.review-approved

The allowed call has a signed receipt that anyone with the public key can verify offline. The denied attempt has no receipt, and the approval log is not signed, so keep both in mind when you show the trail to an auditor.

Composing with protect-mcp

If both plugins are installed, each plugin's hooks/hooks.json registers its own PreToolUse hook, and Claude Code runs both on every tool call:

json
{ "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" }

Each evaluate.sh reads tool_name and tool_input from the hook payload on stdin (Claude Code sets no TOOL_NAME variable) and evaluates its own policy: ./protect.cedar for protect-mcp and ./review-governance.cedar here.

Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it.

Standards

  • Ed25519 — RFC 8032 (digital signatures)
  • JCS — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization)
  • Cedar — AWS's open authorization policy language
  • IETF draft — draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts

来源与署名

来源:wshobson/agents位于plugins/review-agent-governance/skills/review-agent-setup提交46891e7

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架