Codehealth Mcp

作者 affaan-mef648e01899b無授權條款275K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 天前更新

Real-time structural Code Health via CodeScene MCP — review before edits, verify score deltas after changes, gate commits and PRs. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring, checking if AI changes degraded a file, or before commit/PR.

AI 產生的概覽

引導代理使用 CodeScene MCP 伺服器進行結構性程式碼健康度審查、分數變化檢查,以及提交與 PR 閘門。

功能
此技能指示代理連線至 CodeScene MCP 伺服器,並呼叫四個獨立工具:code_health_review、code_health_score、pre_commit_code_health_safeguard 與 analyze_change_set。它定義了修改前審查、修改後驗證的循環,解讀 1-10 分的評分,並規範伺服器無法使用時的行為。它產出結構性可維護性回饋與回歸閘門,而非程式碼變更。
適用情境
適用於審查程式碼品質、重構檔案、檢查 AI 變更是否降低可維護性,或在提交與拉取請求之前。它被定位為與 lint、測試及驗證流程並用的結構性檢查。
執行需求
需要在代理執行環境中設定 CodeScene MCP 伺服器(@codescene/codehealth-mcp,透過 npx 執行),並設定 CS_ACCESS_TOKEN 環境變數。需要網路存取以安裝與執行該伺服器,並會讀取本機儲存庫檔案與 git 狀態。不附帶指令碼。

Code Health MCP (CodeScene)

Structural maintainability feedback for AI-assisted coding. Complements style/lint skills (coding-standards, plankton-code-quality) with design-level health scores and regression gates.

Upstream: codescene-oss/codescene-mcp-server Package: @codescene/codehealth-mcp (stdio via npx)

Security and boundaries

Opt-in (ECC): The codescene block in mcp-configs/mcp-servers.json is a template only. ECC plugin installs do not auto-enable bundled MCP servers. Copy the entry into your config only if you want it. You can exclude it during ECC install/sync with ECC_DISABLED_MCPS=codescene,....

Credentials: No bundled token. Set CS_ACCESS_TOKEN yourself (see getting-a-personal-access-token.md in the upstream repo). Never commit tokens to the repo.

What the tools read: When invoked, tools analyze files and git state in the local repository you point them at (paths you pass, plus branch context for analyze_change_set). They do not run by themselves. For standalone mode, follow upstream privacy docs: codescene-mcp-server README and CodeScene policies. Do not use this skill for secrets, credentials, or paths you do not want analyzed.

If the MCP is unavailable (offline, bad token, server crash): Do not invent Code Health scores. Tell the user the check was skipped. Continue only with explicit user approval. Prefer lint/tests/verification-loop for gating when MCP is down. Re-enable checks once the server connects.

When to Use

  • User asks to review code quality, refactor a file, or check if AI changes degraded maintainability
  • Before editing a hotspot, legacy module, or unfamiliar file
  • Before commit or pull request when you need a maintainability safeguard
  • After a large agent-written diff — verify Code Health did not regress
  • Pair with verification-loop, tdd-workflow, or /quality-gate as a structural check (not a replacement for tests/lint)

When to Activate

Same triggers as When to Use above — this heading is what ECC uses for skill auto-activation.

How It Works

1. Connect the MCP server

Copy the codescene entry from mcp-configs/mcp-servers.json into your harness MCP config.

Claude Code (~/.claude.json → mcpServers):

json
"codescene": {  "command": "npx",  "args": ["-y", "@codescene/codehealth-mcp"],  "env": {    "CS_ACCESS_TOKEN": "YOUR_CS_ACCESS_TOKEN_HERE"  }}

Project-scoped: merge the same block into .mcp.json at the repo root.

Token setup is documented in the upstream repo (link above). Standalone mode does not require a paid CodeScene platform account for the four tools listed below. Restart the session and confirm the codescene server is connected before relying on scores.

2. Call standalone tools only

ToolWhen to use
code_health_reviewFull structural analysis before modifying a file
code_health_scoreQuick numeric score after each change (delta check)
pre_commit_code_health_safeguardBlock commits that introduce Code Health regressions
analyze_change_setBranch-level check before opening a PR

Do not call platform-only tools (e.g. repository-wide technical debt hotspot lists). Do not reference delta_analysis — not available on standalone.

3. Interpret scores (1–10)

RangeMeaningAgent behavior
9.0–10.0Green — healthySafer to extend; still prefer vertical slices
4.0–8.9Yellow — debtTread carefully; no drive-by refactors
1.0–3.9Red — severe debtNarrow scope only

4. Run the feedback loop

Before touching a file

  1. Run code_health_review on the target path.
  2. Record baseline score and listed code smells.
  3. Plan the smallest change that addresses the task.

Scope by score: below 5 — minimal diff only; 5–7 — no broad refactors; above 7 — safer to refactor, still verify after each edit.

After each change

  1. Run code_health_score on the same file.
  2. Compare to the baseline from code_health_review.
  3. If the score regressed, fix before continuing. Never mark the task done while the score is lower than when you started.

Before every commit — run pre_commit_code_health_safeguard on the repository path.

Before a PR — run analyze_change_set against the base branch (e.g. main).

Examples

Example: Flask maintainability improvement

On pallets/flask, an agent loop using only standalone tools:

  1. code_health_review on a target module (baseline 4.82)
  2. Targeted refactor addressing listed smells
  3. code_health_score after each edit
  4. pre_commit_code_health_safeguard before commit
  5. analyze_change_set before PR

Result: Code Health 4.82 → 9.1 (free standalone token only).

Example: AGENTS.md enforcement block

Paste into the project AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md:

md
## Code Health (CodeScene MCP)
Before modifying any file: run `code_health_review`, note score and issues.
- Score below 5: problematic range — scope changes narrowly.- Score 5–7: warning range — no broad refactors.
After each change: run `code_health_score` to verify delta.
- If score regressed: fix before continuing; never declare done if score dropped.
Before every commit: run `pre_commit_code_health_safeguard`.
Before PR: run `analyze_change_set`.

Example: anti-patterns vs correct loop

markdown
# BAD: Edit first, check later[large refactor without code_health_review]
# BAD: Ignore score drop"Tests pass" → mark task done while Code Health decreased
# BAD: Broad refactor on red-score file (below 5)Drive-by cleanup across the module
# GOOD: review → small change → score → commit safeguard → analyze_change_set

Pairing with ECC

ECC skill / flowCode Health MCP role
coding-standardsStyle/naming; Code Health = structure/complexity
plankton-code-qualityWrite-time lint/format; Code Health = pre/post edit structural gate
verification-loop / /quality-gateAdd structural regression check before "done"
security-reviewSecurity vs maintainability — use both when relevant
tdd-workflowTests pass ≠ healthy design — check score after refactors

Context tip: ECC recommends keeping MCP count low. Enable codescene when doing substantive edits; disable when not needed.

Related Skills

  • coding-standards — baseline conventions
  • plankton-code-quality — write-time lint/format hooks
  • verification-loop — build/test/lint gate
  • tdd-workflow — test-first development
  • security-review — security checklist
  • documentation-lookup — library docs via Context7 (orthogonal)

來源與署名

來源:affaan-m/ecc位於skills/codehealth-mcp提交ef648e0

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架