Hipaa Compliance

作者 affaan-mef648e01899b無授權條款275K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 天前更新

HIPAA準拠実装、セキュリティ対策、監査ログ、およびデータ保護戦略。

AI 產生的概覽

為處理 PHI 的美國醫療軟體提供 HIPAA 合規決策指引、防護規則與升級路徑。

功能
此技能是處理美國醫療合規任務時的 HIPAA 專用進入點。它提供決策關卡,用來判斷資料是否為 PHI、相關方是否屬於受涵蓋實體或業務夥伴、是否需要 BAA,以及存取與稽核是否符合最小必要標準。它也列出在日誌、分析、提示詞、URL 和第三方工具中處理 PHI 的防護規則,並指向相關的實作與審查技能。
適用情境
當請求明確提到 HIPAA、PHI、受涵蓋實體、業務夥伴或 BAA 時使用。它也適用於建置或審查儲存、處理、匯出或傳輸 PHI 的美國醫療軟體,以及評估日誌、分析、LLM 提示詞、儲存或支援工作流程是否有 HIPAA 風險。
執行需求
無需指令碼或特殊工具;這是僅含說明的技能。它引用了 healthcare-phi-compliance、healthcare-reviewer 和 security-review 等其他技能,但這些技能不包含在此資料夾中。

HIPAA Compliance

Use this as the HIPAA-specific entrypoint when a task is clearly about US healthcare compliance. This skill intentionally stays thin and canonical:

  • healthcare-phi-compliance remains the primary implementation skill for PHI/PII handling, data classification, audit logging, encryption, and leak prevention.
  • healthcare-reviewer remains the specialized reviewer when code, architecture, or product behavior needs a healthcare-aware second pass.
  • security-review still applies for general auth, input-handling, secrets, API, and deployment hardening.

When to Use

  • The request explicitly mentions HIPAA, PHI, covered entities, business associates, or BAAs
  • Building or reviewing US healthcare software that stores, processes, exports, or transmits PHI
  • Assessing whether logging, analytics, LLM prompts, storage, or support workflows create HIPAA exposure
  • Designing patient-facing or clinician-facing systems where minimum necessary access and auditability matter

How It Works

Treat HIPAA as an overlay on top of the broader healthcare privacy skill:

  1. Start with healthcare-phi-compliance for the concrete implementation rules.
  2. Apply HIPAA-specific decision gates:
    • Is this data PHI?
    • Is this actor a covered entity or business associate?
    • Does a vendor or model provider require a BAA before touching the data?
    • Is access limited to the minimum necessary scope?
    • Are read/write/export events auditable?
  3. Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the task affects patient safety, clinical workflows, or regulated production architecture.

HIPAA-Specific Guardrails

  • Never place PHI in logs, analytics events, crash reports, prompts, or client-visible error strings.
  • Never expose PHI in URLs, browser storage, screenshots, or copied example payloads.
  • Require authenticated access, scoped authorization, and audit trails for PHI reads and writes.
  • Treat third-party SaaS, observability, support tooling, and LLM providers as blocked-by-default until BAA status and data boundaries are clear.
  • Follow minimum necessary access: the right user should only see the smallest PHI slice needed for the task.
  • Prefer opaque internal IDs over names, MRNs, phone numbers, addresses, or other identifiers.

Examples

Example 1: Product request framed as HIPAA

User request:

Add AI-generated visit summaries to our clinician dashboard. We serve US clinics and need to stay HIPAA compliant.

Response pattern:

  • Activate hipaa-compliance
  • Use healthcare-phi-compliance to review PHI movement, logging, storage, and prompt boundaries
  • Verify whether the summarization provider is covered by a BAA before any PHI is sent
  • Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the summaries influence clinical decisions

Example 2: Vendor/tooling decision

User request:

Can we send support transcripts and patient messages into our analytics stack?

Response pattern:

  • Assume those messages may contain PHI
  • Block the design unless the analytics vendor is approved for HIPAA-bound workloads and the data path is minimized
  • Require redaction or a non-PHI event model when possible

Related Skills

  • healthcare-phi-compliance
  • healthcare-reviewer
  • healthcare-emr-patterns
  • healthcare-eval-harness
  • security-review

來源與署名

來源:affaan-m/ecc位於docs/ja-JP/skills/hipaa-compliance提交ef648e0

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架