Seo Sxo

作者 agricidaniel4b99de2f7de7MIT18K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 天前更新

Diagnose search-experience and intent mismatches using SERP page types, user stories, and persona scoring. Use when ranking problems appear intent- or layout-driven.

僅含說明Marketing & Sales
AI 產生的概覽

運用搜尋結果頁類型、使用者故事與人物誌評分,診斷搜尋體驗與意圖不符的問題。

功能
針對目標網址與關鍵字,分析搜尋結果頁的前段自然結果,將頁面類型分類,並偵測頁面與 Google 所獎勵內容之間的不一致。它會從搜尋結果訊號推導使用者故事,依七個落差構面為頁面評分,並產出以人物誌為基礎的評分與優先順序建議。也可選擇產生附有具體佔位內容的 IST/SOLL 線框圖。
適用情境
當排名問題看似由搜尋意圖或頁面版面配置,而非技術性 SEO 健康度所造成時使用。適合用來檢視頁面的類型與結構是否符合某個關鍵字的搜尋結果頁預期。
執行需求
僅為說明文件,未附指令碼。需要能抓取並渲染目標網址、存取網路搜尋以取得搜尋結果資料,以及所引用的分類、人物誌評分、使用者故事與線框圖文件。選用的 DataForSEO MCP 工具可提供更精確的搜尋結果與關鍵字資料,呼叫前需確認費用。

Search Experience Optimization (SXO)

SXO bridges the gap between SEO (what Google rewards) and UX (what users need). Traditional SEO audits check technical health. SXO asks: "Does this page deserve to rank for this keyword based on what Google is actually rewarding in the SERP?"

Core Insight

A page can score 95/100 on technical SEO and still fail to rank because it is the wrong page type for the keyword. If Google shows 8 product pages and 2 comparison pages for your keyword, your blog post will never break through -- no matter how well-optimized it is.

Commands

CommandPurpose
/seo sxo <url>Full SXO analysis (auto-detect keyword from page)
/seo sxo <url> <keyword>Full SXO analysis for a specific keyword
/seo sxo wireframe <url>Generate IST/SOLL wireframe with concrete placeholders
/seo sxo personas <url>Persona-only scoring (skip SERP analysis)

Execution Pipeline

Step 1: Target Acquisition

  1. Fetch the target URL via "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run render_page.py <URL> --mode auto (SPA-aware and SSRF-safe)
  2. Parse with "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run parse_html.py <URL> to extract: title, H1, meta description, headings hierarchy, word count, schema markup, CTAs, media elements
  3. If no keyword provided, extract primary keyword from title tag + H1 overlap
  4. Validate keyword is non-empty before proceeding

Step 2: SERP Backwards Analysis

Read references/page-type-taxonomy.md for classification rules.

  1. Search Google for the target keyword (WebSearch)
  2. For each of the top 10 organic results, record:
    • URL and domain authority tier (brand / niche authority / unknown)
    • Page type (classify using taxonomy)
    • Content format (long-form, listicle, how-to, comparison, tool, video)
    • Word count estimate (from snippet length and page structure)
    • Schema types present (from currently supported SERP features; exclude FAQ/HowTo)
    • Media signals (video carousel, image pack, thumbnail presence)
  3. Record SERP features present:
    • Featured snippet (paragraph / list / table / video)
    • People Also Ask (extract all visible questions)
    • Ads (top and bottom -- count and analyze ad copy themes)
    • Related searches (extract all)
    • Knowledge panel / local pack / shopping results
    • AI Overview presence and source types
  4. Calculate SERP consensus:
    • Dominant page type (>60% = strong consensus, 40-60% = mixed, <40% = fragmented)
    • Content depth expectations (average word count tier)
    • Schema expectation (most common structured data types)
    • Media expectations (video required? images critical?)

Step 3: Page-Type Mismatch Detection

This is the core SXO insight. Compare target page type against SERP consensus.

Mismatch severity levels:

Target TypeSERP ExpectsSeverityRecommendation
Blog PostProduct PagesCRITICALCreate dedicated product page
Blog PostComparisonHIGHRestructure as comparison with matrix
ProductInformationalHIGHAdd educational content layer
Landing PageTool/CalculatorHIGHBuild interactive tool component
Service PageLocal ResultsMEDIUMAdd location signals + local schema
Any type match-ALIGNEDFocus on content depth and UX

Classification rules:

  • Classify target page using references/page-type-taxonomy.md
  • Classify each SERP result using the same taxonomy
  • Flag mismatch if target type differs from SERP dominant type
  • If SERP is fragmented (no dominant type), note opportunity for differentiation

Step 4: User Story Derivation

Read references/user-story-framework.md for the full framework.

From SERP signals, derive user stories:

  1. PAA questions reveal knowledge gaps and concerns
  2. Ad copy themes reveal commercial triggers and value propositions
  3. Related searches reveal the search journey (what comes before/after)
  4. Featured snippet format reveals the expected answer structure
  5. AI Overview reveals what Google considers the definitive answer

For each signal cluster, generate a user story:

As a [persona derived from signal],I want to [goal derived from query intent],because [emotional driver from ad copy / PAA tone],but I'm blocked by [barrier derived from PAA questions / related searches].

Generate 3-5 user stories covering the primary intent angles.

Step 5: Gap Analysis

Compare the target page against SERP expectations across 7 dimensions:

DimensionWhat to CompareScore
Page TypeTarget type vs SERP dominant type0-15
Content DepthWord count, heading depth, topic coverage0-15
UX SignalsCTA clarity, above-fold content, mobile layout0-15
Schema MarkupPresent vs expected structured data types0-15
Media RichnessImages, video, interactive elements vs SERP norm0-15
Authority SignalsE-E-A-T markers, social proof, credentials0-15
FreshnessLast updated, date signals, content recency0-10

Total: 0-100 SXO Gap Score (lower = larger gap, higher = better alignment)

Step 6: Persona-Based Scoring

Read references/persona-scoring.md for methodology.

  1. Derive 4-7 personas from SERP intent signals:
    • Cluster PAA questions by theme
    • Segment ad copy by target audience
    • Map related searches to journey stages
  2. For each persona, score the target page on 4 dimensions (25 pts each):
    • Relevance: Does the page address this persona's need?
    • Clarity: Can this persona find their answer within 10 seconds?
    • Trust: Are there adequate trust signals for this persona?
    • Action: Is there a clear next step for this persona?
  3. Output persona cards with scores and specific improvement recommendations
  4. Sort recommendations by weakest persona first (biggest opportunity)

Step 7: Wireframe Generation (Optional)

Only execute when /seo sxo wireframe is invoked.

Read references/wireframe-templates.md for templates.

  1. Generate IST (current state) wireframe from parsed page structure
  2. Generate SOLL (target state) wireframe based on:
    • SERP consensus page type
    • Gap analysis findings
    • Persona scoring weaknesses
  3. Use ultra-concrete placeholders:
    • NOT: "Add a CTA here"
    • YES: "Add pricing CTA with annual savings badge below hero, linking to /pricing#enterprise"
  4. Output as semantic HTML section outline with annotations

DataForSEO Integration

If DataForSEO MCP tools are available:

  1. Before any API call, run cost estimate and confirm with user
  2. Use serp_organic_live_advanced for precise SERP data (positions, features, snippets)
  3. Use kw_data_google_ads_search_volume for search volume and competition metrics
  4. Fall back to WebSearch if DataForSEO unavailable -- note reduced precision in output

SXO Score vs SEO Health Score

The SXO score is separate from the main SEO Health Score.

  • SEO Health Score = technical compliance (crawlability, speed, schema, etc.)
  • SXO Gap Score = alignment between page and SERP expectations
  • A page can score 95 SEO + 30 SXO = technically perfect but strategically misaligned
  • Both scores should be reported together when both are available

Cross-Skill References

FindingHand Off To
E-E-A-T gaps in persona scoring/seo content for deep E-E-A-T audit
Missing schema types/seo schema for generation
Local intent detected in SERP/seo local for GBP analysis
Content depth gaps/seo page for deep page analysis
Technical issues found during fetch/seo technical for full audit
Image/media gaps/seo images for optimization

Output Format

Full SXO Analysis

## SXO Analysis: [URL]### Target Keyword: [keyword]
### 1. SERP Landscape- Dominant page type: [type] ([confidence]% consensus)- SERP features: [list]- Content depth norm: [word count range]- Schema expectation: [types]
### 2. Page-Type Alignment- Your page type: [type]- SERP expects: [type]- Verdict: [ALIGNED | MISMATCH (severity)]- Impact: [explanation]
### 3. User Stories (derived from SERP signals)[3-5 user stories with source signals]
### 4. Gap Analysis (SXO Score: XX/100)[7-dimension breakdown table]
### 5. Persona Scores[4-7 persona cards with 4-dimension scores]
### 6. Priority Actions[Ranked list: fix mismatch first, then weakest persona gaps]
### 7. Limitations[What could not be assessed, data source notes]

Error Handling

ErrorAction
URL fetch failsReport error, suggest checking URL accessibility
No keyword provided or detectedAsk user to provide target keyword
WebSearch returns <5 resultsProceed with available data, note limited sample
SERP has no organic results (all ads)Note highly commercial SERP, analyze ad copy only
Target page is JavaScript-renderedNote limitation, use available HTML content
DataForSEO cost exceeds thresholdFall back to WebSearch, notify user

Quality Checklist

Before delivering results, verify:

  • Target URL was fetched via "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/claude-seo" run render_page.py <URL> --mode auto (not raw curl/fetch)
  • Page type classification uses taxonomy from references
  • At least 5 SERP results were analyzed
  • User stories cite specific SERP signals as evidence
  • Persona scores include concrete improvement suggestions
  • SXO score is clearly labeled as separate from SEO Health Score
  • Limitations section is present and honest
  • Cross-skill recommendations are included where relevant

來源與署名

來源:agricidaniel/claude-seo位於skills/seo-sxo提交4b99de2

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架