Competitive Intel

alirezarezvani/claude-skills/c-level-advisor/skills/competitive-intel

作者 alirezarezvani19392f7a0826MIT27K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫5 週前更新

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.

AI 產生的概覽

指導系統化的競爭對手追蹤,產出銷售作戰卡、定位簡報與贏單/丟單分析。

功能
此技能提供一套結構化的競爭情報工作流程,涵蓋競爭對手識別、追蹤構面、SWOT 與定位圖分析,以及功能落差分析。它定義了給業務使用的作戰卡、給行銷的定位更新、給產品的功能落差摘要,以及給高階主管的一頁簡報等輸出格式,並訂出每月、事件觸發與每季的執行節奏。它也概述贏單/丟單訪談流程,以及各高階主管角色的情報分發職責。此技能不含指令碼,僅引用一份操作手冊與一個作戰卡範本。
適用情境
適用於分析競爭對手、製作業務作戰卡、追蹤市場動向,或將產品相對於替代方案進行定位時。也適合贏單/丟單分析與週期性的競爭格局檢視。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,僅為說明性內容。它引用兩個隨附檔案:references/ci-playbook.md 與 templates/battlecard-template.md,並假定可存取評論網站、募資資料庫與職缺資訊等外部來源進行研究。

Competitive Intelligence

Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.

Keywords

competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy

Quick Start

Ask in natural language for the deliverable you need:

"Map our competitive landscape" — direct, indirect, and future competitors "Build a battlecard for [competitor]" — sales-ready battlecard "Run a win/loss analysis" — recent wins and losses by reason "What did [competitor] do recently?" — competitor update tracking "Build a competitive positioning map" — 2x2 positioning map

Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System

Layer 1: Competitor Identification

Direct competitors: Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point. Indirect competitors: Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house"). Future competitors: Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.

The 2x2 Threat Matrix:

Same ICPDifferent ICP
Same problemDirect threatAdjacent (watch)
Different problemDisplacement riskIgnore for now

Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?

Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions

Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:

DimensionSourcesCadence
Product movesChangelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedInMonthly
Pricing changesPricing page, sales call intel, customer feedbackTriggered
FundingCrunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedInTriggered
Hiring signalsLinkedIn job postings, IndeedMonthly
PartnershipsPress releases, co-marketingTriggered
Customer winsCase studies, review sites, LinkedInMonthly
Customer lossesWin/loss interviews, churned accountsOngoing
Messaging shiftsHomepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library)Quarterly

Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks

SWOT per Competitor:

  • Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
  • Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
  • Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
  • Threats: What's their existential risk?

Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis): Choose axes that matter for your buyers:

  • Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
  • Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly

Feature Gap Analysis:

FeatureYouCompetitor ACompetitor BGap status
[Feature]✅✅❌Your advantage
[Feature]❌✅✅Gap — roadmap?
[Feature]✅❌❌Moat
[Feature]❌❌✅Competitor B only

Layer 4: Output Formats

For Sales (CRO): Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep. See templates/battlecard-template.md

For Marketing (CMO): Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.

For Product (CPO): Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.

For CEO/Board: Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.

Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence

Monthly (scheduled):

  • Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
  • Update battlecards with new intel
  • Publish 1-page summary to leadership

Triggered (event-based):

  • Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
  • Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
  • Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
  • Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week

Quarterly:

  • Full competitive landscape review
  • Update positioning map
  • Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
  • Add/remove companies from tracking list

Win/Loss Analysis

This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.

When to interview:

  • Every lost deal >$50K ACV
  • Every churn >6 months tenure
  • Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)

Who conducts it:

  • NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
  • Customer success, product team, or external researcher

Question structure:

  1. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
  2. "Who else were you considering?"
  3. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
  4. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
  5. "What was the deciding factor?"
  6. "What would have changed your decision?"

Aggregate findings monthly:

  • Win reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
  • Patterns over time

The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession

Signs you're over-tracking competitors:

  • Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
  • Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
  • You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
  • Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"

Signs you're under-tracking:

  • Your AEs get blindsided on calls
  • Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
  • You missed a major product launch until customers told you
  • Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves

The right posture:

  • Know competitors well enough to win against them
  • Don't let them set your agenda
  • Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps

Distributing Intelligence

AudienceFormatCadenceOwner
AEs + SDRsUpdated battlecards in CRMMonthly + triggeredCRO
ProductFeature gap analysisQuarterlyCPO
MarketingPositioning briefQuarterlyCMO
Leadership1-page competitive summaryMonthlyCEO/COO
BoardCompetitive landscape slideQuarterlyCEO

One source of truth: All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.


Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence

SignalWhat it means
Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segmentFundamental positioning problem, not sales problem
Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X"Feature gap that's real, not just optics
Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domainMajor product investment incoming
Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP12-month runway for them to compete hard
Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decisionYou're the "check box" — fix perception or segment

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Intelligence TypeFeeds ToOutput Format
Product movesCPORoadmap input, feature gap analysis
Pricing changesCRO, CFOPricing response recommendations
Funding roundsCEO, CFOStrategic positioning update
Hiring signalsCHRO, CTOTalent market intelligence
Customer wins/lossesCRO, CMOBattlecard updates, positioning shifts
Marketing campaignsCMOCounter-positioning, channel intelligence

References

  • references/ci-playbook.md — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
  • templates/battlecard-template.md — sales battlecard template

來源與署名

來源:alirezarezvani/claude-skills位於c-level-advisor/skills/competitive-intel提交19392f7

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架