Analyze Chart

作者 amplitude96fc7d4c58bb無授權條款42 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫今天更新

Performs deep analysis of a specific Amplitude chart to explain trends, anomalies, and likely drivers. Use when a metric looks unusual, investigating a spike or drop, or understanding the "why" behind numbers.

僅含說明Data & Analytics
AI 產生的概覽

深入分析特定的 Amplitude 圖表,說明趨勢、異常與可能的原因。

功能
此技能引導代理對單一 Amplitude 圖表進行結構化的深入分析:透過 URL 或 ID 取得圖表、驗證資料,並將模式判定為突增、驟降、趨勢、季節性波動或異常。接著透過有界的分群引導,最多選取九個高訊號屬性來追查可能的原因,並將變化與實驗、部署、註解及客戶回饋進行關聯。最後產出一份結構化、可供決策的分析,涵蓋發生了什麼、發生時間、主要假設、支持證據、替代解釋、影響以及建議的下一步行動。
適用情境
適用於指標出現意外突增或驟降、需要了解趨勢背後原因,或為利害關係人準備有證據支撐的分析時。也適合追查使用者或事件分群之間的差異。
執行需求
需要存取 Amplitude 圖表資料及相關工具,包括從 URL 取得圖表、查詢圖表、查找事件屬性、查詢實驗與部署、搜尋內容,以及取得客戶回饋洞察。必須提供圖表 URL 或圖表 ID。此技能不含指令碼,僅為操作說明。

Chart Deep Dive

When to Use

  • A metric spiked or dropped unexpectedly
  • You need to understand what’s driving a trend
  • Preparing a detailed, evidence-backed analysis for stakeholders
  • Investigating differences between user or event segments

Instructions

Step 0: Identify the Chart

  • Accept a chart URL or chart ID
  • If the user provides a URL, use Amplitude:get_from_url to extract the chart ID
  • If no chart identifier is provided, ask explicitly for the chart URL or ID and stop

Step 1: Retrieve and Validate Chart Data (Mandatory)

  • Use Reading chart data to retrieve the chart definition and data
  • If chart data cannot be retrieved or is empty, do not proceed
    • Explain what’s missing (time range, event, filters, permissions)
    • Ask the user to correct the chart or provide a valid chart

Capture and restate:

  • Metric being measured
  • Time range and granularity
  • Chart type (e.g. time series, funnel, retention)
  • Existing filters, segments, or breakdowns

Step 2: Identify the Pattern and Change Window

Use Analyzing chart to characterize what’s happening:

  • Spike / Drop: Sudden change on specific date(s)
  • Trend: Gradual increase or decrease over time
  • Seasonality: Recurring weekly or monthly patterns
  • Anomaly: Deviation from recent baseline or historical behavior

Explicitly identify:

  • The window of change (start/end)
  • Direction and magnitude of the change
  • Baseline period used for comparison (default: previous equal-length period)

Step 3: Investigate Likely Drivers (Bounded)

Instead of broad slicing, use guided segmentation:

  1. Use Finding the right event properties to identify the most relevant properties for explaining the change
  2. Select up to 9 high-signal properties (e.g. platform, country, plan, version)
  3. Re-run Analyzing chart with these properties in mind to determine:
    • Which segments contribute most to the change
    • Whether the pattern is localized or broad-based
    • Only fetch up to 3 charts at a time when using Amplitude:query_charts

Avoid testing more than 9 properties in aggregate unless the user explicitly asks for deeper exploration.


Step 4: Correlate with Context (Required for Anomalies)

For spikes, drops, or unexpected shifts, gather contextual signals in the same timeframe:

  • Use Getting experiments to identify active experiments or flags
  • Use Getting deployments to identify releases or rollouts
  • Use Searching for content to surface annotations or relevant documentation
  • Use Amplitude:get_feedback_insights to search customer feedback trends that might explain the change
  • Use Amplitude:get_feedback_mentions to pull in specific customer mentions if there's a likely feedback trend tied to what's being explained.

Determine whether any contextual changes align temporally with the chart pattern.


Step 5: Synthesize Findings

Present a structured, decision-ready analysis:

  1. What Happened
    Clear description of the observed pattern and magnitude

  2. When
    Exact timeframe and comparison baseline

  3. Primary Hypothesis
    Most likely explanation based on chart data and contextual signals

  4. Supporting Evidence

    • Key metrics
    • Segment contributions
    • Relevant experiments, deployments, or annotations
  5. Alternative Explanations
    1–3 plausible alternatives and why they are less likely

  6. Impact
    Quantify impact where possible (users, events, conversion, revenue proxy)

  7. Recommended Next Step
    One clear follow-up action (e.g. deeper segment, experiment review, instrumentation check)

Always include:

  • Chart name
  • Chart ID
  • Link back to the chart
  • Coverage (e.g. properties tested, segments analyzed)

Best Practices

  • Always compare against a clear baseline period
  • Distinguish observations from hypotheses
  • Prefer high-signal segmentation over exhaustive slicing
  • Note data quality issues (low volume, incomplete periods, heavy “(none)” values)
  • Do not create or edit charts unless the user explicitly asks

來源與署名

來源:amplitude/mcp-marketplace位於plugins/amplitude/skills/analyze-chart提交96fc7d4

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架