Live Data Forensics

作者 amplitude96fc7d4c58bb無授權條款42 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫今天更新

Investigates live product issues against Amplitude data — "is X firing today", "did the release break Y", "which users are affected by Z". Covers the verify-then-query loop, query_amplitude_data parameterization, and its common failure modes. Use for incident analysis, instrumentation checks, and affected-user discovery.

AI 產生的概覽

針對 Amplitude 資料調查線上產品問題,驗證事件行為並找出受影響使用者。

功能
引導代理在 Amplitude MCP 伺服器上執行「先驗證後查詢」的流程:取得專案脈絡、重複使用既有分析、確認事件分類與資料匯入,再以參數化查詢量化影響。內容涵蓋查詢參數化、常見的編譯與逾時失敗模式,以及透過族群和單一使用者時間軸找出受影響使用者。產出是一份報告,說明事件是否觸發、量級與首次出現時間、影響佔比、關鍵切片以及受影響使用者證據。
適用情境
適用於事件分析、埋點檢查以及受影響使用者排查,例如某事件今天是否觸發、某次發布是否破壞了某項指標。也適合依環境比較和評估整體使用者影響。
執行需求
需要存取帶有相應工具的 Amplitude MCP 伺服器(脈絡、實體搜尋、分類、匯入檢查、查詢、族群、使用者資料)以及到該伺服器的網路存取。此技能不附帶指令碼,僅為說明文件。

Live Data Forensics

The most common multi-tool job on this MCP server: verify live event behavior, quantify impact, find affected users. Calls observed in the wild follow one arc — follow it too.

The arc

  1. Context. get_amplitude_context (no args) → again with projectId. Do not guess project IDs.
  2. Reuse before rebuild. search_amp_entities for existing analyses of the same area — saved charts already encode correct event names and segments.
  3. Verify taxonomy before querying. Inspect the connected catalog and use its current taxonomy reader to confirm candidate event names, status, and queryability, then read event, user, or group properties for exact names and scope. Never guess names—a wrong name returns a well-formed chart with empty data, which reads as "zero".
  4. Check the event is live. check_for_recent_event_ingestion confirms first-seen/last-seen before you query — a silent event means the chart will be empty no matter how correct the definition is.
  5. Quantify. query_amplitude_data bursts — one slice per call (by version, by reason property, by platform), not one mega-query. Prefer the typed chart parameter (kind: 'segmentation', events + where/group_by + date_range); it compiles server-side and validation + taxonomy checks run automatically — no separate pre-flight call needed. Compare prod vs staging/UAT projects when the question is environment-specific.
  6. Find affected users. query_amplitude_data with a user-ID group_by to rank affected users → use_amplitude_cohorts action: 'find' for the full set.
  7. Reconstruct timelines. get_amp_user_data include: 'timeline' per user, batched (10–20 parallel calls is normal for population analysis; the tool accepts up to 10 identifiers per call).

query_amplitude_data parameterization (this is where most errors come from)

  • Compile errors are self-serve. The typed path fails with a 400 naming the offending field plus a fix hint — fix that one field and retry, don't rebuild. The three seen most: relative range whose unit doesn't match interval ("Last 3 Years" at weekly interval — re-denominate as "Last 156 Weeks" or change the interval); funnel conversion_window missing unit; unknown filter operator for that chart kind (use set for presence — works in every kind).
  • Date range is required — set date_range explicitly, either {relative: "Last 30 Days"} or {start, end} epoch seconds, never both. Sub-daily intervals only allow short windows (hour caps ~8 days); daily granularity caps around 30 days.
  • Every filter needs a valid operator and matching scope — take op and scope from the taxonomy lookup, not intuition. A scope mismatch ("property X is not tracked on this event_type") means you used a user property as an event property or vice versa.
  • Segments combine property conditions and behaviors — where (property conditions) plus performed ("users who did event ≥N times in a window"). Omit segments entirely for all users.
  • Raw definition fallback (composition, revenueLtv, advanced params): on failure the response embeds the chart-type schema with valid enums and a working example — fix from that and retry.
  • read ETIMEDOUT is a backend timeout — narrow the date range/filters and retry once.

What to report back

  • Whether the event fires at all, volume, and since when (first-seen).
  • Impact: affected-user count and share of active users.
  • The slices that matter (version, platform, reason property).
  • Affected-user evidence: top users by volume + 2–3 reconstructed timelines.

來源與署名

來源:amplitude/mcp-marketplace位於plugins/amplitude/skills/live-data-forensics提交96fc7d4

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架