Customize

anthropics/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/skills/customize

作者 anthropics4a6c651889c97cc9140580363c73e0eb17379c2b無授權條款9.6K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日儲存庫9 天前更新

Guided customization of your privacy practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, DPA playbook, privacy policy commitments, PIA house style, DSAR process, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my playbook", or "customize".

AI 產生的概覽

以引導方式修改既有的隱私法律實務設定,一次只調整一個部分,不必重新執行完整的設定訪談。

功能
此技能會引導使用者調整先前建立的隱私實務設定,設定存放於外掛設定檔中。它會讀取現有設定,依群組列出可自訂的部分,例如風險姿態、升級聯絡人、DPA 手冊、隱私政策承諾、PIA 內部風格、DSAR 流程與工作區路徑,接著套用使用者要求的單一變更,並說明下游會有什麼改變。涉及共用公司設定的變更會寫入獨立的公司設定檔,並提示會影響所有外掛。它產出的是更新後的設定值,而非文件。
適用情境
當使用者想修改已設定完成的隱私設定中的某一項時使用,例如風險姿態、升級聯絡人、DPA 立場、PIA 章節或 DSAR 時限。它適用於已經存在的設定;尚未完成設定的使用者會被引導先執行冷啟動訪談。
執行需求
需要既有的隱私法律外掛設定,包括 privacy-legal 的 CLAUDE.md 設定檔,以及上一層的共用 company-profile.md 檔案,且佔位符值已被取代。此技能僅為指示性說明,不附帶指令碼。

/customize

When this runs

The user typed /privacy-legal:customize. They want to change something in their privacy profile — a risk posture, an escalation contact, a DPA position, a PIA section, a DSAR timeline — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML.

What to do

  1. Read the config. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md (and ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md one level up). If the plugin config does not exist or still contains [PLACEHOLDER] values, say:

    You haven't run setup yet. Run /privacy-legal:cold-start-interview first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have.

  2. Show the customizable map. List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value:

    • Company / who you are — name, industry, jurisdictions, stage, practice setting, controller vs. processor orientation (shared across all 12 plugins — changes flow through company-profile.md)
    • Risk posture — conservative / middle / aggressive, what each means for processor obligations, cross-border transfers, and retention
    • People — DPO, privacy team, engineering liaison, outside counsel, escalation chain
    • DPA playbook — positions on sub-processor notice, deletion, audit, liability, international transfers, SCCs — as processor and as controller
    • Privacy policy commitments — the commitments your privacy notice has made that /policy-monitor watches practice against
    • PIA house style — section order, risk scoring, stakeholder framing, when DPIA triggers apply
    • DSAR process — verification, statutory timelines per regime, exemption application, template response structure
    • Workflow — intake path, matter workspaces, policy-monitor sweep cadence
    • Integrations — document storage / privacy tool / Slack status, fallbacks
  3. Ask what they want to change.

    What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in your own words.

  4. Make the change. Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config.

    Examples:

    • Sub-processor notice 30 days → 14 days: "/dpa-review will now flag anything shorter than 14 days as a deviation. Existing DPAs stay as logged."
    • New DSAR exemption in the playbook: "/dsar-response will surface this exemption in the assessment step where the facts match."
    • Risk posture middle → conservative: "I'll flag more activities for PIA escalation, recommend stricter SCC clauses, and be more conservative on retention."
  5. For shared-profile changes (company name, industry, jurisdictions, practice setting, stage): write to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md and note:

    This change affects all 12 plugins — any plugin that reads your jurisdiction footprint now sees [new value].

  6. Close.

    Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can run /privacy-legal:customize anytime.

Guardrails

  • Never delete a section. If the user wants to "remove" a regime from scope, offer to mark it [Not currently in scope] and explain what flagging drops.
  • Flag internal inconsistency. If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., "processor only" + controller playbook positions active; or "no EU nexus" + SCCs in the default template), flag the tension.
  • Flag guardrail degradation. The [review] flag, source attribution tags, [verify] tags on cited regulations, and the DPIA-trigger mandatory-check on /use-case-triage are load-bearing — do not remove. If statutory DSAR timelines are adjusted below the regulatory minimum, refuse and explain why.
  • One change at a time. Don't re-ask the whole interview.

來源與署名

來源:anthropics/claude-for-legal位於privacy-legal/skills/customize提交4a6c651

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架