Ticket Triage

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/customer-support/skills/ticket-triage

作者 anthropicsae1513ea94dc無授權條款27K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫今天更新

Triage and prioritize a support ticket or customer issue. Use when a new ticket comes in and needs categorization, assigning P1-P4 priority, deciding which team should handle it, or checking whether it's a duplicate or known issue before routing.

AI 產生的概覽

將收到的支援工單分類、評定 P1-P4 優先順序、檢查重複並轉派給合適團隊。

功能
接收支援工單或客戶問題描述,產出結構化的分診評估。內容包括主要分類與選用的次要分類、附理由的 P1-P4 優先順序、所屬產品領域、轉派建議,以及建議的首次客戶回覆和內部備註。也會說明如何對照支援平台、知識庫和專案追蹤工具進行重複工單與已知問題檢查。
適用情境
當新的支援工單或客戶問題需要分類、評定優先順序、決定處理團隊,或在處理前檢查是否為重複或已知問題時使用。也適合用來草擬首次客戶回覆和內部交接備註。
執行需求
僅為說明文件,未附任何指令碼。重複與已知問題檢查涉及支援平台、知識庫和專案追蹤工具等連接來源,這些為預留位置,需要先連接對應工具。

/ticket-triage

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

Usage

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

Examples:

  • /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
  • /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
  • /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
  • /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF

Workflow

1. Parse the Issue

Read the input and extract:

  • Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
  • Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
  • Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
  • Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
  • Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?

2. Categorize and Prioritize

Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:

  • Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
  • Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
  • Identify the product area the issue maps to

3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues

Before routing, check available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
  • ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
  • ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request

Apply the duplicate detection process below.

4. Determine Routing

Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

5. Generate Triage Output

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]
**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]**Product area:** [Area/team]
### Issue Summary[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]
### Key Details- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]
### Routing Recommendation**Route to:** [Team or queue]**Why:** [Brief reasoning]
### Suggested Initial Response[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,set expectations, provide workaround if available.Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]
### Internal Notes- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]- [Escalation triggers to watch for]

6. Offer Next Steps

After presenting the triage:

  • "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
  • "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
  • "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
  • "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

CategoryDescriptionSignal Words
BugProduct is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedlyError, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-toCustomer needs guidance on using the productHow do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature requestCustomer wants a capability that doesn't existWould be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
BillingPayment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issuesCharge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
AccountAccount access, permissions, settings, or user managementLogin, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
IntegrationIssues connecting to third-party tools or APIsAPI, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
SecuritySecurity concerns, data access, or compliance questionsData breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
DataData quality, migration, import/export issuesMissing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
PerformanceSpeed, reliability, or availability issuesSlow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

Category Determination Tips

  • If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
  • If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
  • "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
  • "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
  • "How do I make it work?" = How-to
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Priority Framework

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

  • The customer cannot use the product at all
  • Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
  • A security incident is in progress
  • The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

  • A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
  • Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
  • The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
  • No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

  • A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
  • The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
  • A single user or small team is affected
  • The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

  • Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
  • Feature requests and enhancement ideas
  • General questions or how-to inquiries
  • Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

  • Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
  • Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
  • The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
  • A workaround that was in place stops working
  • The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route toWhen
Tier 1 (frontline support)How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support)Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
EngineeringConfirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
ProductFeature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
SecurityData access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/FinanceRefund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

  1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
  2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
  3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
  4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

  • Link the new ticket to the existing one
  • Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
  • Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
  • Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]would be disruptive for your work.
I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team isinvestigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, youcan [workaround]."]
I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]
[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"][Steps or guidance]
Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-upquestions.

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]would be valuable for your workflow.
I've documented this and shared it with our product team.While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedbackdirectly informs our roadmap priorities.
[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let melook into this for you.
[If straightforward: resolution details][If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will havean answer for you within [timeframe]."]

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concernsseriously and are reviewing this immediately.
I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.
[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend[protective action]."]

Triage Best Practices

  1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
  2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
  3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
  4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
  5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
  6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
  7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority

來源與署名

來源:anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins位於customer-support/skills/ticket-triage提交ae1513e

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架

更多來自 anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins 的技能

Ticket Deflector

anthropics

精選

Reads a forwarded customer email or ticket, pulls order and refund status from a payments connector (PayPal, Square, or Stripe) or Shopify, account history from the CRM, and open tickets from a support desk (Zoho Desk), drafts a tone-matched reply in the owner's writing voice, and can issue a refund through the payments connector with explicit owner approval. With Shopify connected it also runs a proactive order-triage mode that surfaces orders needing attention — unfulfilled past the promised window, payment problems, pending refunds, stuck shipments — and drafts the next action for each before the customer has to ask. Use when the user says "draft a response," "answer this customer," "where's my order," "I want a refund," "check my orders," or "anything about to blow up."

待分類27K今天更新

Tax Season Organizer

anthropics

精選

Prepares tax-season materials for the owner's accountant, not tax advice. US federal tax; a non-US business gets its closed-books packet instead. Two modes: (1) quarterly estimated tax from YTD net income in the ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books); (2) year-end 1099 prep, scanning the ledger, PayPal, and Stripe for contractors paid over USD 600 into a 1099-NEC list with missing W-9 flags. Any tax request routes first to /tax-prep, which confirms the books are closed and reconciled before running this skill. Use this skill directly only when the owner says the period's books are already closed: "books are closed, now do the 1099s," "run the quarterly estimate off the closed numbers," or "just the contractor W-9 list."

待分類27K今天更新

Tax Prep

anthropics

精選

根據已結帳的帳目準備稅務資料:季度預估繳稅明細,或年終 1099-NEC 清單與會計師資料包。

Business & Finance27K今天更新

Smb Onboard

anthropics

精選

引導小型企業主完成首次設定:連接工具、執行一次展現價值的配方、記錄業務背景並設定每週檢查節奏。

Productivity & Workflow27K今天更新

Smb Router

anthropics

精選

將小型企業主的需求轉接到合適的外掛技能或指令,並說明可用功能。

Productivity & Workflow27K今天更新

Month End Prep

anthropics

精選

Reconciles the accounting ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books) against PayPal, Shopify, Square, and Stripe settlements, flags transactions that need attention, suspicious duplicates, and missing receipts, then writes a plain-English P&L narrative and exports a close packet (xlsx + one-page PDF). This is the first link of the /close-month command; a request to close the month or the books routes there, and the command runs this skill before refreshing the forecast and distributing the packet. Use this skill directly only when the owner wants the reconciliation alone, with no forecast refresh and no distribution: "just reconcile, no packet," "what's missing from the books," "flag the duplicates and missing receipts," or "write the P&L narrative for this month."

待分類27K今天更新