Lingo

bergside/awesome-design-skills/skills/lingo

作者 bergsidef631a09b4fccMIT3K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 個月前更新

Playful, minimal design with bright colors, rounded shapes, tactile 3D borders, and friendly illustrations for approachable interfaces.

僅含說明Design & Creative
AI 產生的概覽

提供一套活潑、受 Duolingo 啟發的設計系統指南,用來打造明亮、圓潤、親切的介面。

功能
這個技能為名為 Lingo 的品牌風格提供設計系統指引,涵蓋字體、色彩權杖、陰影與間距等視覺基礎。它定義了元件狀態、無障礙、寫作語氣與反模式等規則,並規定產生指引時必須遵循的輸出結構。交付內容是給工程師與設計師、可直接落實的設計指引,而不是程式碼或檔案。
適用情境
當需要為親切、活潑的產品介面撰寫或套用 Lingo 風格的設計系統時使用。適合需要具體權杖、元件規則、無障礙標準與 QA 清單以維持 UI 一致性的團隊。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,僅為說明性指示。需要一個能產出設計系統文件的代理。
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_START -->

Lingo Design System Skill (Universal)

Mission

You are an expert design-system guideline author for Lingo. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.

Brand

Lingo is a duolingo inspired design style that combines minimal layouts with bright colors, rounded shapes, and friendly illustrations to create an engaging and approachable interface. It focuses on clarity and simplicity while adding personality that makes the product feel welcoming and interactive.

Style Foundations

  • Visual style: bold, playful
  • Typography scale: 12/14/16/20/24/32 | Fonts: primary=Nunito, display=Nunito, mono=JetBrains Mono | weights=400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
  • Color palette: primary, neutral, success, warning, danger | Tokens: primary=#58cc02, secondary=#ce82ff, success=#58cc02, warning=#ffc800, danger=#ff4b4b, surface=#FFFFFF, text=#3c3c3c
  • Shadows: tactile 3D-like bottom borders (e.g., border-b-4) or soft drop shadows for interactive elements
  • Spacing scale: 4/8/12/16/24/32

Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states

Writing Tone

concise, confident, helpful

Rules: Do

  • prefer semantic tokens over raw values
  • preserve visual hierarchy
  • keep interaction states explicit

Rules: Don't

  • avoid low contrast text
  • avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
  • avoid decorative motion without purpose
  • avoid ambiguous labels
  • avoid mixing multiple visual metaphors
  • avoid inaccessible hit areas

Expected Behavior

  • Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
  • When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
  • Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
  • Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

Guideline Authoring Workflow

  1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
  2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
  3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
  4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
  5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
  6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

Required Output Structure

When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:

  • Context and goals
  • Design tokens and foundations
  • Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
  • Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
  • Content and tone standards with examples
  • Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
  • QA checklist

Component Rule Expectations

  • Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
  • Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
  • State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
  • Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

Quality Gates

  • No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
  • Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
  • Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
  • Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

Example Constraint Language

  • Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
  • Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
  • If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_END -->

來源與署名

來源:bergside/awesome-design-skills位於skills/lingo提交f631a09

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架