W Review

blockmatic/basilic-skills/skills/workflow/w-review

作者 blockmatic7e05e2abd052dc6b526e8a28e36d102d42bfd635無授權條款1 個星標收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日儲存庫6 天前更新

Review a change for evidenced defects and risks without editing it.

AI 產生的概覽

以唯讀方式審查程式碼變更,用證據驗證疑似缺陷並依影響排序報告發現。

功能
針對指定的 diff、分支、拉取請求或工作樹,結合其預期行為進行審查;除非同時要求修復,否則保持唯讀。它會閱讀測試以了解哪些主張確實被涵蓋,檢查範圍內的審查面向(行為變更時包括文件/README),並可啟動 2–3 個唯讀探索者分別負責這些面向。疑似缺陷必須透過具體執行路徑、失敗案例或原始碼證據加以驗證,發現依影響排序,並附上檔案/行號、觸發條件、後果和最小有效補救建議。
適用情境
適用於程式碼變更在合併前需要審查以找出有證據支持的缺陷和風險時。也適合審查者應保持唯讀、質疑驗證聲明而非核准變更的情境。
執行需求
僅為指令,不附帶指令碼。需要能夠存取被審查的變更(diff、分支、PR 或工作樹)、其測試,以及所引用的 references/review-dimensions.md 檔案。

Use the specified diff, branch, PR, or working tree and its intended behavior. Remain read-only unless fixes are also requested.

  1. Understand the trigger and expected result before judging the implementation. Read tests to learn which claims are actually exercised.
  2. Check the in-scope review dimensions [blocked], including docs/README when behavior changed. Spawn 2–3 read-only explorers that split those dimensions. Concentrate on changed behavior, callers, and failure paths. Skip dimensions that are out of scope and say so.
  3. Validate suspected defects with a concrete execution path, failing case, or source evidence. Do not invent timings or vulnerabilities from appearances.
  4. Challenge verification claims. Order findings by impact with file/line, trigger, consequence, and smallest useful remedy. An inspection is not proof that tests passed and is not approval to merge.

來源與署名

來源:blockmatic/basilic-skills位於skills/workflow/w-review提交7e05e2a

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架