Workshop Facilitation

作者 deanpeters1b5a524ebb95無授權條款7.2K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫5 週前更新

Facilitate workshop sessions in a one-step, multi-turn flow. Use when an interactive skill needs consistent pacing, options, and progress tracking.

AI 產生的概覽

定義互動式工作坊與引導式工作階段的引導協定,每次只問一個問題。

功能
這個技能為互動式工作階段訂出一套可重複使用的引導協定:先說明預期,提供引導模式、脈絡傾倒或最佳猜測三種進入方式,而且每回合只問一個問題。它會用 Context Qx/8、Scoring Qx/5 之類的標籤顯示進度,提供編號快速選項,只在決策點給出編號建議。它也會處理打斷、暫停以及呼叫時附帶的脈絡,最後給出摘要、已做的決定,以及需要驗證的假設。
適用情境
當某個互動式技能或工作坊需要一致的節奏、進度可見度,以及對使用者回答與打斷的可預期處理時使用。它也適合用來進行結構化工作階段,例如定位工作坊或探索衝刺啟動會議。可以單獨呼叫,只要說明要引導的工作階段即可。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,它只是純指示協定。不需要憑證或網路存取,也可以無輸入執行,不過說明工作階段並提供脈絡會更有幫助。

Purpose

Provide the canonical facilitation pattern for interactive skills: one step at a time, with clear progress, adaptive recommendations at decision points, and predictable interruption handling.

Input

Nothing required — this skill defines the facilitation protocol other interactive skills follow. Also useful: If invoked standalone, name the session you want facilitated and any context for it; that context carries into the session as answers already given.

Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.

Arriving empty-handed? That works too. When another skill references this protocol, that skill's Input section governs what to provide.

Example invocation: Facilitate a 45-minute retro on our failed beta launch using this protocol.

Key Concepts

  • One-step-at-a-time: Ask a single targeted question per turn.
  • Session heads-up + entry mode: Start by setting expectations and offering Guided, Context dump, or Best guess mode.
  • Progress visibility: Show user-facing progress labels like Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5.
  • Decision-point recommendations: Use enumerated options only when a choice is needed, not after every answer.
  • Quick-select response options: For regular context/scoring questions, provide concise numbered answer options plus Other (specify) when useful.
  • Flexible selection parsing: Accept #1, 1, 1 and 3, 1,3, or custom text, then synthesize multi-select choices.
  • Context-aware progression: Build on previous answers and avoid re-asking resolved questions.
  • Interruption-safe flow: Answer meta questions directly (for example, "how many left?"), restate status, then resume.
  • Fast path: If the user requests a single-shot output, skip multi-turn facilitation and deliver a condensed result.

Application

  1. Start with a brief heads-up on estimated time and number of questions.
  2. Ask the user to choose an entry mode:
    • 1 Guided mode (one question at a time)
    • 2 Context dump (paste known context; skip redundancies)
    • 3 Best guess mode (infer missing details and label assumptions)
  3. Run one question per turn and wait for an answer before continuing.
  4. Keep questions plain-language; include a short example response format when helpful.
  5. Show progress each turn:
    • Context Qx/8 during context collection
    • Scoring Qx/5 during assessment/scoring
  6. Ask follow-up clarifications only when they materially improve recommendation quality.
  7. For regular context/scoring questions, offer quick-select numbered response options when practical:
    • Keep options concise and mutually exclusive when possible.
    • Include Other (specify) if likely answers are open-ended.
    • Accept multi-select responses like 1,3 or 1 and 3.
  8. Provide numbered recommendations only at decision points:
    • after context synthesis,
    • after maturity/profile synthesis,
    • during priority/action-plan selection.
  9. Accept numeric or custom choices, synthesize multi-select choices, and continue.
  10. If interrupted by a meta question, answer directly, then restate progress and pending question.
  11. If the user says stop/pause, halt immediately and wait for explicit resume.
  12. End with a clear summary, decisions made, and (if best guess mode was used) an Assumptions to Validate list.

Examples

Opening: "Quick heads-up: this should take about 7-10 minutes and around 10 questions. How do you want to start?

  1. Guided mode
  2. Context dump
  3. Best guess mode"

User: "2"

Facilitator: "Paste what you already know. I’ll skip answered areas and ask only what’s missing."

Decision point after synthesis:

  1. Prioritize Context Design (Recommended)
  2. Prioritize Agent Orchestration
  3. Prioritize Team-AI Facilitation

User: "1 and 3"

Facilitator: "Great. We’ll run Context Design first, with Team-AI Facilitation in parallel."

Inline input at invocation: when the user supplies context with the invocation itself, credit it as answers, open at the first unanswered question, and keep progress labels honest (start at Context Q2/6 if Q1 was covered). Full transcript, including the re-asking anti-pattern: examples/inline-input-flow.md [blocked].

Common Pitfalls

  • Asking multiple questions in the same turn.
  • Offering recommendations after every answer (creates interaction drag).
  • Using shorthand labels without plain-language questions.
  • Hiding progress, so users don't know how much remains.
  • Ignoring the user's chosen option or custom direction.
  • Failing to label assumptions when running in best-guess mode.

References

  • Use as the source of truth for interactive facilitation behavior.
  • Apply alongside workshop skills in skills/*-workshop/SKILL.md and advisor-style interactive skills.

來源與署名

來源:deanpeters/product-manager-skills位於skills/workshop-facilitation提交1b5a524

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架