K6 Cloud Investigate Test

作者 grafana1ccacf29049f無授權條款279 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫今天更新

Investigate a Grafana Cloud k6 test — describe the script, list run history, identify pass/fail status, pull raw metric time-series and log lines for one or more runs, and (if asked) safely edit the test script. Use when the user asks about a specific k6 cloud test or run, gives a `/a/k6-app/tests/<id>` or `/a/k6-app/runs/<id>` URL, asks "is this test passing", "why are my k6 tests failing", "show me metrics for run X", "show me logs for run X", or wants to add thresholds / fix a failing test. Trigger this skill even when the user doesn't explicitly say "investigate" — pasted `/a/k6-app/...` URLs, "why did run X fail", "what happened with my test", "is my test healthy", "the latest run looks weird", "checks are failing but the run says passed", or any request to diagnose a Grafana Cloud k6 run all qualify.

僅含說明DevOps & Cloud
AI 產生的概覽

調查 Grafana Cloud k6 測試與執行:指令碼、執行歷史、通過/失敗狀態、指標、日誌及安全的指令碼編輯。

功能
提供一套九步工作流程,用於調查 Grafana Cloud k6 測試或執行。它會從 URL 辨識測試或執行,取得測試中繼資料與指令碼快照,以分頁列出執行歷史,並從執行結果、執行狀態與逐項檢查指標三個層面判定通過/失敗狀態。它也會為執行拉取原始指標時間序列與日誌行,並在被要求時安全地編輯測試指令碼。
適用情境
當使用者詢問某個特定的 k6 雲端測試或執行、貼上 k6-app 測試或執行 URL、詢問測試是否通過、執行為何失敗,或想要某次執行的指標或日誌時使用。也適合診斷異常或不健康的執行,以及新增閾值或修正失敗的測試。
執行需求
需要安裝 gcx CLI 並針對使用者的 Grafana Cloud 堆疊完成驗證,且需網路存取 Grafana Cloud k6 外掛代理 API(v6 REST 與 v5 指標)及 Loki 日誌。它不附帶指令碼,僅為說明文件,並含一份範例參考文件。

k6 Cloud test investigator

Structured 9-step workflow for investigating a Grafana Cloud k6 test or run.

This skill is workflow-only. All API calls go through gcx api against the plugin proxy, using v6 for REST and v5 for metrics. For the underlying mechanics (gcx auth, path conventions, endpoint discovery, log queries, script editing, threshold semantics, gotchas), see the k6-manage skill — every step below references it.

The content unique to this skill is:

  • the ordered investigation flow (Steps 1-9 below)
  • the date-alignment check ("last 7 days" ≠ "last 7 runs")
  • the 3-layer pass/fail determination (result vs status vs per-check checks query)
  • a worked example with realistic numbers (references/worked-example.md)

Core principles

  1. Read before write. Always GET the script before any PUT. gcx k6 load-tests update-script is a write that replaces the live script with whatever file you pass — running it "just to see the URL it hits" has cost users their production scripts. If you need to learn URLs, run any non-mutating command with -vvv --log-http-payload instead.
  2. Paginate when enumerating runs. The /test_runs endpoint caps at 1000 rows and gcx k6 runs list --limit 0 does not auto-follow @nextLink. Use the gcx api loop documented in k6-manage §3.
  3. Verify date framing. When the user says "last 7 days", "this week", "recent runs" — confirm the most-recent run's created actually falls in that window. Surface the gap if not.
  4. check() doesn't fail runs; only thresholds do. And thresholds with zero observations are reported as ✓ pass. See "Threshold semantics" below for the full deep dive; the per-check checks metric query in Step 5 catches both cases.

Prerequisites

gcx installed and authenticated against the user's stack. See k6-manage §1. Verify with:

bash
gcx --context <stack> config check    # expect "✔ Connectivity: online"

Investigation workflow

Step 1: Identify the test and target run(s)

From the user's URL:

  • /a/k6-app/tests/<id> → load test (parent of many runs)
  • /a/k6-app/runs/<id> → a specific run

To go run → test: fetch the run via gcx api, see k6-manage §2 for the path-shape rules:

bash
gcx --context <stack> api /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v6/test_runs/<run_id>

and read .test_id from the response. To list runs for a test, see Step 3.

Step 2: Fetch test metadata and script

bash
gcx --context <stack> k6 load-tests get <test_id> -o json

For the script, follow the GET half of the safe-edit recipe in k6-manage §5 — save a backup if you'll be editing later.

Two script endpoints exist, and the difference matters for investigation. k6-manage §5 documents both: the current load-test script and the per-run snapshot that was actually executed. They drift apart whenever the script is edited after a run. Whenever the question involves "what changed", "why did this run fail", or you're examining a run more than a few days old, also fetch the run-bundled snapshot(s) via k6-manage §5's run-script endpoint and diff against the current load-test script (or against another run's snapshot). The current load-test script is the wrong artifact to reason about a past run.

Step 3: List runs WITH pagination

Use the gcx api + @nextLink loop pattern documented in k6-manage §3 against /cloud/v6/load_tests/<test_id>/test_runs. After collecting all_runs:

python
print(f"Total: {len(all_runs)}")runs_sorted = sorted(all_runs, key=lambda r: r['created'], reverse=True)for r in runs_sorted[:10]:    print(f"  {r['created']:30s} id={r['id']:>8} status={r['status']:<10} result={r.get('result','?')}")

Report to user: total run count, date range, latest run date. If "latest run" is more than a day old, call it out — they may believe the schedule is firing when it isn't.

Step 4: Verify date alignment with user's intent

If the user asked for "last 7 days" / "this week" / "recent": filter by date range, not by row count — "7 most recent runs" could span a day or a year depending on how often the test runs.

python
last7 = [r for r in all_runs if r['created'] >= '<today_minus_7_days_iso>']

If len(last7) == 0: surface this to the user immediately. Don't proceed with stale data.

Step 5: Determine pass/fail status

For each run examine three independent layers:

LayerFieldMeaning
Run-level outcomeresult (passed / failed / error / aborted)Whether thresholds breached
Run-level statusstatus (completed / aborted)Whether the run finished orderly
In-script checksv5 checks metric, aggregated by the check labelPer-check success rate

For a run that the user thinks is "failing" but reports result: passed: check the third layer. Common pattern: every iteration's check() returns false but the run still "passes" because no threshold is defined on checks. See "Threshold semantics" below for the full deep dive (zero-observation trap, abortOnFail cloud delay, operator support).

Query the per-check breakdown via v5 (see k6-manage/references/metrics.md §7 for query_aggregate_k6 shape):

bash
gcx --context <stack> api \  "/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_aggregate_k6(query='ratio by (check)',metric='checks')"

Each result entry in the response carries a check label with the check name and a single value: the success ratio (0.0–1.0). For raw success/fail counts, also query increase_nz by (check) (successes) and increase_z by (check) (failures).

Step 6: Fetch metrics for a run

Use the v5 metrics endpoints documented in k6-manage/references/metrics.md. Typical workflow:

bash
# 6a. List metrics available for the run (metrics.md §1)gcx --context <stack> api /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/metrics
# 6b. List labels for a metric to know what's available to filter/group by (metrics.md §4)gcx --context <stack> api \  "/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/labels?match[]=http_req_duration"
# 6c. Time-series — pick a query method that matches the metric's type (metrics.md §6)gcx --context <stack> api \  "/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_range_k6(query='histogram_quantile(0.95) by (name,status)',metric='http_req_duration',step=10)"
# 6d. Scalar aggregate over the whole run (metrics.md §7)gcx --context <stack> api \  "/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_aggregate_k6(query='increase',metric='http_reqs')"

Picking the right query method per metric type matters — see the "Query methods" tables in k6-manage/references/metrics.md. For browser tests, the URL/status breakdown comes from labels + label/{name}/values (metrics.md §4/§5), not from a separate tags endpoint.

Step 7: Fetch logs for a run

Follow the Loki recipe in k6-manage §4 (gcx api against /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/logs/..., {test_run_id="<id>"} selector, mandatory X-K6TestRun-Id header, scope start/end to run.created/run.ended). Save the response to /tmp/run_<id>_logs.json and summarise from the file as described there.

Step 8: (If asked) edit the script safely

Use the full safe-edit recipe in k6-manage §5 (GET → backup → edit → k6 inspect → 1-iter smoke → PUT with Content-Type: application/octet-stream → sha256 verify).

When the edit involves thresholds, also read "Threshold semantics" below for the zero-observation trap, the abortOnFail cloud delay, and operator support (==/!= work despite docs).

Step 9: Report

Pick a template based on the question shape.

For single-run investigations ("what's going on with run X"):

Test: <name> (id <test_id>)Run:  <run_id> @ <created> → <ended>, load_zone=<zone>, result=<result>
Logs (<n> streams, <m> lines):  - <stream summary>
Metrics (key indicators):  - <metric>: <method> = <value> (n=<count>)  ...
Per-check breakdown:  - <check name>: <success_rate> (succ=<n>, fail=<n>)  ...
Diagnosis: <one-paragraph>

For multi-run comparisons ("what's different between passing and failing runs", "did this change cause the failures"):

Question: <one-line restatement of what the user is trying to attribute>
Run timeline (relevant window):
| Run ID | Created (UTC) | Result | exec_duration | processing_duration | k6 build | error code | key check ratios ||---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|| ... | ... | passed | 60s | 195s | <build> | — | 1.0/1.0/1.0 || ... | ... | failed | 27s | 193s | <build> | — | 0.0/n=0/n=0 || ... | ... | error  | 51s | 3601s aborted | <build> | 8016 | 1.0/1.0/1.0 |
Differences that matter:  - <field>: <value-in-passing> vs <value-in-failing> — <interpretation>  ...
Script diff (if relevant): <bundled-script diff between a representative passing and failing run, summarised>
Diagnosis: <one-paragraph attributing the change to test-side, SUT-side, or platform-side, with the supporting evidence>

The table makes side-by-side anomalies obvious (e.g. a column that's identical across passing and failing rules out that dimension as the cause; a column that flips between them is your candidate).

If the user asked for raw data dumps, also save them to /tmp/k6inv/run<id>/ and tell them the paths.

Threshold semantics

Thresholds, not check() calls, are what determine a run's result. The behaviour has several non-obvious corners that mislead first-time investigators, so they're collected here. Step 5 ("Determine pass/fail status") and Step 8 ("edit the script safely") both depend on this section.

What result means

result valueMeaning
passedAll thresholds passed (or none defined)
failedAt least one threshold failed
errorEither the script crashed before finishing (e.g. browser wouldn't launch) or k6 Cloud aborted the run platform-side. To tell which, check status_history[*].extra.code on the run — a non-null code indicates a platform abort (e.g. 8016 = "Test run max lifetime exceeded" during processing_metrics). Platform aborts are not your code's fault even though they surface as error.
abortedUser or system aborted the run

check() calls do not affect result directly. They emit observations into the built-in checks rate metric, which a threshold may then evaluate. If no threshold references checks, failing checks are invisible to the run-level result.

The "zero observations = pass" trap

k6 reports a threshold as ✓ pass when the underlying metric has zero samples — even if the threshold expression would otherwise evaluate to false:

checks{check:response is 200}✓ 'rate==1.0' rate=0.00%       ← ✓ pass!?

This bites when the script throws before reaching the relevant check() call. Force a check observation in a catch block to make the threshold see something:

javascript
try {  const r = await page.goto(URL);  check(r, { "response is 200": x => x.status() === 200 });  // ... rest of iteration body  check(true, { "script completed without exception": () => true });} catch (e) {  console.error(e);  check(null, { "script completed without exception": () => false });} finally {  await page.close();}

Then add 'checks{check:script completed without exception}': ['rate==1.0'] to thresholds. This catches both navigation failures AND later-stage exceptions.

abortOnFail cloud delay

When k6 runs in the cloud, thresholds are evaluated every 60 seconds. The abortOnFail feature may be delayed by up to 60 seconds.

For runs shorter than 60 s, abortOnFail may not fire before iterations complete naturally. The threshold is still evaluated at end-of-run and result flips to failed — abort just doesn't save execution time.

Operators

Docs show <, >, <=, >=. == and != also work even though they aren't in the docs. For rate metrics (value 0.00–1.00), rate==1.0 means "every observation was non-zero" and rate==0 means "all observations were zero."

Workflow-specific gotchas

For the canonical gotcha list (auth expiry, doubled cloud/cloud/, 415 on script PUT, Loki missing X-K6TestRun-Id, script PUT not bumping updated, gcx k6 runs list --limit 0 not following @nextLink), see k6-manage §7. The entries below are specific to this investigation workflow:

SymptomCauseFix
"Latest run was 6 months ago" but schedule says dailyYou didn't paginate /test_runsUse the @nextLink loop in k6-manage §3 (Step 3)
"Last 7 days" report contains only old runsFiltered by row count, not dateRe-filter by created >= <iso_date> (Step 4)
Threshold reports ✓ pass but checks failZero check observations; iteration aborted before check() ranSee "Threshold semantics" above
result: error but the script logs/metrics look fineLikely a platform abort (e.g. processing_metrics exceeded the 1h cap, code 8016). The execution itself completed normally.Check status_history[*].extra.code on the run. Non-null platform code → not your code's fault. See "Threshold semantics"
Investigating a past run by reading the current load-test scriptScript may have been edited since the run executed — what you're reading isn't what ranGET the run's bundled script via the per-run endpoint (k6-manage §5) and diff against the current load-test script before drawing conclusions
Just overwrote the user's scriptInvoked update-script to "see the URL"Restore from the backup taken in Step 2. To learn URLs without writing, use -vvv --log-http-payload on any non-mutating command.
CLI --iterations 1 breaks browser scenariosOverrides scenario block entirelyEdit iterations: in-file with sed instead

Reference

  • references/worked-example.md [blocked] — a synthetic investigation with realistic findings, useful as a template for the Step 9 report.

來源與署名

來源:grafana/skills位於skills/grafana-k6/k6-cloud-investigate-test提交1ccacf2

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架

更多來自 grafana/skills 的技能

React 19 Plugin Migration

grafana

指導將 Grafana 外掛遷移至 React 19 相容,依序完成建置、相依性與原始碼修改步驟。

Software Development279今天更新

Plugin Bundle Size

grafana

指導使用 React.lazy、Suspense 與 webpack 程式碼分割來最佳化 Grafana 應用程式外掛的打包體積。

Software Development279今天更新

Grafana Scenes

grafana

使用 @grafana/scenes 框架建置 Grafana 外掛頁面,涵蓋場景、面板、變數與下鑽導覽。

Software Development279今天更新

Check Npm

grafana

對 JS/TS 儲存庫的 npm、yarn 或 pnpm 設定進行唯讀供應鏈強化稽核。

Security279今天更新

Mimir

grafana

指導架設與維運 Grafana Mimir,用於可擴充、多租戶、長期的 Prometheus 與 OTLP 指標儲存。

DevOps & Cloud279今天更新

K6 Trend Analysis

grafana

Analyze Grafana Cloud k6 test run trends over time. Detects slow metric drift (e.g., P95 latency creeping up while still passing thresholds), computes headroom to thresholds, flags anomalies, and recommends threshold tightening. Use when the user asks about test performance trends, wants to know if metrics are degrading, asks whether thresholds should be tightened, or wants a health check across recent runs for a specific test. Trigger on phrases like "how is my test trending", "is P95 getting worse", "check for performance regression", "should I tighten thresholds", "are my tests degrading", "show me trends for test X", "analyze my k6 test runs", or "is my test getting slower". Also trigger when a user asks to check all tests in a project -- run this skill once per test and synthesize.

待分類279今天更新