Catchup

LilMGenius/paperthin/skills/coil/catchup

作者 LilMGenius7d5dc6235990230e45a24a25c527d81701da5458無授權條款收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日

Rebuild the human's lost context on a project from live state, in plain language: what needs them, what changed, what new words mean. Use when the human returns after a gap, says they can't follow the project anymore, asks what happened or what a term means, or before deciding what to do next when their mental model is stale. Read-only; it briefs, it does not act.

AI 產生的概覽

依據專案即時狀態,用白話重建使用者遺失的專案脈絡,產出簡短簡報。

功能
讀取專案即時狀態,例如近期檔案修改時間、git 歷史、計畫與狀態文件、筆記和任務看板,然後撰寫一份簡短的回歸簡報。簡報依決策需求排序:哪些事項需要本人處理、自上次接觸以來有什麼變化、新出現的術語是什麼意思。此技能為唯讀,產出的是簡報而非變更。
適用情境
適用於使用者隔一段時間後回到專案、表示已經跟不上專案、詢問發生了什麼事或某個術語的意思,或在心智模型已過時的情況下需要先了解狀況再決定下一步時。
執行需求
不含指令碼,僅為說明性指示。需要專案即時狀態的讀取權限,例如檔案、git 歷史、計畫與狀態文件、筆記和任務看板。

Catch the human up at their eye level, from state, not from memory.

Goal

catchup is the re-entry point for a lost human. Long agent cycles coin words, rename files, run experiments, and make calls faster than the owner can follow. Before any next action makes sense, the owner's mental model must be reloaded. catchup reads the live project state and returns a briefing a person with zero retained context can act on. It runs before the next move gets decided: catchup restores the map, so that decision starts from truth instead of a stale memory of it.

Workflow

  1. Read live state only: recent file mtimes, git log/diffs, plan and state docs, re0-memo notes, task boards. Never brief from conversation memory alone — memory is what drifted.
  2. Anchor on the human's last touch (their last message, judgment, or commit). Everything after that point is the delta; everything before it is assumed known and stays out.
  3. Compose in decision order, not chronological order:
    • Needs you — decisions, judgments, or inputs only the human can give, each self-contained enough to act on without opening another file.
    • Changed while you were away — outcomes, not process. "The plan's scoring rule was replaced" beats "I ran three analysis passes."
    • New words — every term coined or repurposed since their last touch, one line each, with where it lives. Skip terms they already used themselves.
  4. Gloss on first use: any project-specific term appearing in the briefing gets an inline plain-language aside at its first occurrence, even if a glossary section follows.
  5. Keep the default short (a screen or less). End with drill-down offers per section, not with everything expanded.

Rules

  • State-grounded: every claim traces to a file, commit, or artifact the human can open. No "as we discussed."
  • Read-only on the project. catchup briefs; it does not fix, rename, or decide.
  • The ask comes first. A briefing that buries the one question needing the human is a log.
  • Outcome voice, not journey voice. Narrating the agent's process is self-report, not briefing.
  • Silence the settled: closed decisions and healthy metrics get one line or none.
  • Honest completeness: "done" means verified done; "moved" is not "reconciled"; say which.
  • Do not re-explain terms the human demonstrably knows (they used them first).

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. Cold-read the briefing: no sentence requires pre-gap memory or an unglossed coined term to parse.
  2. The "needs you" items are each actionable without opening another file.
  3. Every claim has a checkable source (file, commit, artifact path).
  4. It fits on a screen, with expansion offered rather than delivered.

來源與署名

來源:LilMGenius/paperthin位於skills/coil/catchup提交7d5dc62

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架