Paper Revision

作者 lingzhi2279e6c085d65e3無授權條款386 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫7 個月前更新

Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.

AI 產生的概覽

依照審稿意見修改學術論文,將意見對應到章節並進行針對性編輯。

功能
這個技能引導代理依結構化流程修改論文:解析並排序審稿意見,把每則意見對應到受影響的章節,規劃澄清、補充實驗、新增分析、結構調整或補充引用等動作,再執行針對性編輯。它會為審稿人標記修改過的文字,確認意見是否都已處理,並產出把各項變更與審稿意見相互對照的修改摘要。它也會指向一份包含修改提示與流程說明的參考檔案。
適用情境
在收到同儕審查意見而需要修改時使用,前提是已有論文草稿與審稿回饋。它適合有系統地逐條處理審稿意見,並記錄隨之而來的變更。
執行需求
需要審稿意見與目前的論文草稿(例如 main.tex 檔案或論文目錄)。這個技能只有說明內容,不附帶指令碼,但會引用一份修改提示檔案,並提到實驗、圖表、自我審查與編譯等相關技能。

Paper Revision

Systematically revise papers based on reviewer feedback.

Input

  • $0 — Reviewer comments/feedback
  • $1 — Current paper draft (main.tex or paper directory)

References

  • Revision workflow and prompts: ~/.claude/skills/paper-revision/references/revision-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Parse and Prioritize Concerns

For each reviewer comment:

  1. Extract the specific concern
  2. Classify: major revision, minor revision, question, suggestion
  3. Map to affected paper section(s)
  4. Prioritize: address major concerns first

Step 2: Plan Revisions

Create a revision plan:

Concern → Affected Section → Required Action → New Content/Experiment

Categories of actions:

  • Clarification: Rewrite text for clarity
  • Additional experiment: Run new experiment, add results
  • New analysis: Add ablation, statistical test, or comparison
  • Structural change: Move, merge, or split sections
  • Citation: Add missing references

Step 3: Execute Revisions

For each planned revision:

  1. Read the current section
  2. Apply targeted edits (preserve surrounding structure)
  3. If new experiments needed: use experiment-code skill
  4. If new figures/tables needed: use figure-generation / table-generation skills
  5. Mark changes (use \textcolor{blue}{...} for revised text)

Step 4: Verify Improvements

  • Re-run self-review skill to check if scores improved
  • Verify all reviewer concerns are addressed
  • Check that revisions don't introduce new issues
  • Ensure page count still fits venue requirements

Step 5: Write Revision Summary

Generate a diff summary:

  • List all changes made with section references
  • Note any new experiments, figures, or tables added
  • Cross-reference each change to the reviewer concern it addresses

Rules

  • Address EVERY reviewer concern — do not skip any
  • Preserve paper structure unless structural change is explicitly needed
  • New results must come from actual experiments, not hallucinated
  • Mark all revised text clearly for the reviewers
  • Keep a copy of the previous version before revising
  • Compare new scores vs previous scores after revision

Related Skills

  • Upstream: self-review
  • Downstream: paper-compilation
  • See also: rebuttal-writing, paper-writing-section

來源與署名

來源:lingzhi227/agent-research-skills位於skills/paper-revision提交9e6c085

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架