Strategy And Competitive Analysis

lyndonkl/claude/skills/strategy-and-competitive-analysis

作者 lyndonkl4acc337d4dbdb19da6469eb2504c16669c1cafa1無授權條款收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日

Develops business strategies grounded in rigorous competitive and market analysis using proven frameworks (Good Strategy kernel, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, Blue Ocean, Playing to Win, Value Chain Analysis, BCG Matrix). Use when developing strategy (market entry, product launch, expansion, M&A, turnaround), conducting competitive analysis, making strategic decisions (build vs buy, pricing, positioning), planning strategic initiatives, or when user mentions strategy, competitive analysis, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, market positioning, or strategic frameworks.

AI 產生的概覽

運用波特五力、SWOT 與好策略內核等框架,指導商業策略擬定與競爭分析。

功能
此技能提供結構化流程,用來界定策略問題、選擇並套用商業框架,並將分析結果綜整為策略。它涵蓋好策略內核、波特五力、SWOT、藍海策略、Playing to Win、價值鏈分析與 BCG 矩陣等框架,以及競爭對手剖析與護城河分析。它產出策略文件,內含分析、診斷、指導方針、協調一致的行動,以及附有負責人、時程與指標的行動計畫。它另附範本、方法參考與品質評分表供自我評估。
適用情境
適用於市場進入、產品上市、擴張、併購或轉型策略,也適用於競爭分析或自建與外購、定價、定位等策略決策。它也適合年度策略規劃與產品組合管理。它鎖定商業策略工作,而非數值資料集分析。
執行需求
沒有指令碼,只有說明與參考檔案。它依賴代理程式以及隨附的範本、方法與評分表資源,並需要業務背景、競爭局勢資訊與可用資源作為輸入。

Strategy & Competitive Analysis

Table of Contents

Core approach -- Good Strategy Kernel (Rumelt): Diagnosis (what's the challenge) → Guiding Policy (overall approach) → Coherent Actions (specific coordinated steps).

Example: SaaS startup entering crowded market → Diagnosis: commoditized features, price competition, high CAC. Guiding Policy: vertical specialization (healthcare) + product-led growth. Coherent Actions: build HIPAA compliance, create compliance templates, offer free tier, invest in SEO for "healthcare SaaS".

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Strategy & Competitive Analysis Progress:- [ ] Step 1: Frame strategic question and gather context- [ ] Step 2: Choose framework(s) based on question type- [ ] Step 3: Conduct analysis using chosen framework(s)- [ ] Step 4: Synthesize insights and formulate strategy- [ ] Step 5: Validate and create action plan

Step 1: Frame strategic question

Clarify the strategic question, business context (industry, stage, constraints), competitive landscape, and success criteria. See Common Patterns for typical question types.

Step 2: Choose framework(s)

For industry/competitive structure → Use Porter's 5 Forces. For positioning → Use Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas or Value Chain Analysis. For overall strategy → Use Good Strategy kernel. For multiple options → Use SWOT per option. See Strategic Frameworks Overview and resources/methodology.md [blocked] for framework selection guidance.

Step 3: Conduct analysis

For straightforward competitive analysis → Use resources/template.md [blocked]. For complex multi-framework strategy → Study resources/methodology.md [blocked] for integrated approach. Gather data (competitor research, market analysis, customer insights), apply framework systematically, document findings with evidence.

Step 4: Synthesize insights

Apply Good Strategy kernel: Diagnosis (core challenge from analysis), Guiding Policy (overall approach to address challenge), Coherent Actions (3-5 specific coordinated steps). Ensure coherence (actions reinforce each other, support guiding policy, address diagnosis).

Step 5: Validate and create action plan

Self-assess using resources/evaluators/rubric_strategy_and_competitive_analysis.json [blocked]. Check: diagnosis grounded in evidence, guiding policy addresses root challenge, actions coherent and specific, competitive positioning clear, assumptions explicit, risks identified. Create strategy-and-competitive-analysis.md with strategy summary, supporting analysis, action plan with owners/timelines.

Strategic Frameworks Overview

FrameworkUse WhenKey Output
Good Strategy KernelOverall strategy formulationDiagnosis + Guiding Policy + Coherent Actions
Porter's 5 ForcesAssess industry attractiveness, competitive intensityIndustry structure analysis, profit potential
SWOT AnalysisEvaluate internal/external factors, compare optionsStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Blue Ocean StrategyFind uncontested market space, redefine competitionStrategy canvas, value innovation
Playing to WinDefine strategic choices explicitlyWhere to play (markets/segments), How to win (advantage)
Value Chain AnalysisIdentify cost advantages, differentiation opportunitiesValue activities, cost drivers, linkages
BCG MatrixManage product portfolioStars, Cash Cows, Dogs, Question Marks
Competitive ProfilingUnderstand specific competitors deeplyCompetitor SWOT, positioning, strategy inference

Framework Selection:

  • Single product launch → Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas + Competitive Profiling
  • Market entry decision → Porter's 5 Forces + Playing to Win
  • Annual strategic planning → Good Strategy Kernel + SWOT
  • Turnaround/crisis → Good Strategy Kernel (diagnosis critical)
  • Portfolio management → BCG Matrix + Resource allocation

See resources/methodology.md [blocked] for detailed framework application guidance.

Competitive Analysis Overview

Competitor Profiling:

  • Identify competitors: Direct (same solution), Indirect (different solution, same job), Potential (adjacent markets, new entrants)
  • Profile each: Product/features, Pricing, Target customers, Positioning/messaging, Strengths/weaknesses, Strategy inference, Financial health, Recent moves
  • Analyze: SWOT per competitor, Competitive positioning map (2x2: price vs features, etc.), Share of wallet, Win/loss patterns

Porter's 5 Forces:

  1. Competitive Rivalry: Number of competitors, market growth rate, differentiation, switching costs, exit barriers
  2. Threat of New Entrants: Barriers to entry (capital, technology, brand, regulation, network effects)
  3. Threat of Substitutes: Alternative solutions, price-performance trade-offs, switching costs
  4. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Concentration, price sensitivity, switching costs, backward integration threat
  5. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Concentration, uniqueness, switching costs, forward integration threat

Output: Industry attractiveness (high/medium/low profit potential), key competitive dynamics, strategic implications.

Competitive Moats (sustainable advantages):

  • Network effects: Value increases with more users (platforms, marketplaces)
  • Switching costs: High cost to change providers (data lock-in, integration, learning curve)
  • Brand: Strong brand recognition and loyalty
  • Cost advantages: Scale economies, proprietary technology, favorable access to resources
  • Regulatory: Licenses, patents, compliance barriers

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Market Entry Strategy

  • Diagnosis: Assess market using Porter's 5 Forces + competitive profiling
  • Guiding Policy: Choose positioning (Blue Ocean or competitive response)
  • Coherent Actions: Go-to-market, product roadmap, pricing, partnerships

Pattern 2: Competitive Response

  • Diagnosis: Analyze competitor threat (new entrant, feature launch, price cut)
  • Guiding Policy: Defend, ignore, or leapfrog
  • Coherent Actions: Feature parity, differentiation doubling-down, or new positioning

Pattern 3: Strategic Planning (Annual)

  • Diagnosis: Current state SWOT + market trends + competitive landscape
  • Guiding Policy: Focus areas (3-5 strategic themes) for next year
  • Coherent Actions: OKRs, initiatives, resource allocation

Pattern 4: Differentiation Strategy

  • Diagnosis: Competitive positioning map + customer needs analysis
  • Guiding Policy: Differentiation axis (vertical, feature set, experience, business model)
  • Coherent Actions: Product roadmap, marketing messaging, pricing structure

Guardrails

Evidence-Based:

  • Ground diagnosis in data (market research, customer interviews, competitor analysis)
  • State assumptions explicitly (market size, growth rate, competitive response)
  • Distinguish facts from hypotheses
  • Cite sources for key claims

Coherence:

  • Actions must reinforce each other (not independent initiatives)
  • Actions must support guiding policy
  • Guiding policy must address diagnosis (not aspirational goals)
  • Strategy must be internally consistent (no contradictions)

Realism:

  • Acknowledge constraints (resources, capabilities, time, competition)
  • Identify risks and mitigation plans
  • Avoid wishful thinking ("if we just execute perfectly...")
  • Test strategy against competitive response scenarios

Specificity:

  • Diagnosis: specific challenge (not "we need to grow" but "customer acquisition cost exceeds LTV in current market")
  • Guiding Policy: clear approach (not "be customer-focused" but "vertical specialization in healthcare")
  • Coherent Actions: concrete steps with owners and timelines (not "improve product" but "build HIPAA compliance by Q2, led by Security Team")

Differentiation:

  • Strategy must be defensible against competition
  • Identify sustainable competitive advantages (moats)
  • Avoid "best practices" that competitors can easily copy
  • Explain why this strategy is hard for competitors to replicate

Quick Reference

Inputs Required:

  • Strategic question or decision to make
  • Business context (industry, stage, goals, constraints)
  • Competitive landscape (who are competitors, market dynamics)
  • Available resources and capabilities

Frameworks to Use:

  • Industry analysis → Porter's 5 Forces
  • Overall strategy → Good Strategy Kernel
  • Positioning → Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas, Value Chain Analysis
  • Portfolio → BCG Matrix
  • Competitor analysis → SWOT, Competitive Profiling

Outputs Produced:

  • strategy-and-competitive-analysis.md with:
    • Strategic question and context
    • Analysis (frameworks applied, findings, evidence)
    • Strategy summary (diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent actions)
    • Competitive positioning
    • Action plan (initiatives, owners, timelines, success metrics)
    • Assumptions, risks, mitigations

Resources:

  • Quick competitive analysis → resources/template.md [blocked]
  • Complex multi-framework strategy → resources/methodology.md [blocked]
  • Quality validation → resources/evaluators/rubric_strategy_and_competitive_analysis.json [blocked]

Minimum Quality Standard:

  • Diagnosis grounded in evidence (not assumptions)
  • Guiding policy addresses root challenge (not symptoms)
  • Coherent actions specific and mutually reinforcing
  • Competitive analysis rigorous (Porter's 5 Forces or equivalent)
  • Assumptions explicit, risks identified with mitigations
  • Average rubric score ≥ 3.5/5 before delivering

來源與署名

來源:lyndonkl/claude位於skills/strategy-and-competitive-analysis提交4acc337

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架