Conventional Commit

marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/skills/conventional-commit

作者 marcelorodrigo99d50948fbc18bce6107dafc74a92e86634acbc2MIT收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日

Create conventional commit messages following best conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits specification.

AI 產生的概覽

指導為 git 變更撰寫符合約定式提交規範的提交訊息與分支名稱。

功能
提供依約定式提交(Conventional Commits)格式撰寫 git 提交訊息的規範,包含標題、內文與頁尾結構。它列出 feat、fix、docs、refactor 等提交類型、主旨行規則、內文指南、破壞性變更與回滾格式,以及分支命名模式。產出的是格式化的提交訊息與分支名稱,而非程式碼。
適用情境
適用於提交程式碼變更、草擬提交訊息或整理 git 歷史記錄時。也適用於提交前檢查是否位於功能分支。
執行需求
需要 git 來執行文中所示的分支檢查指令。不附帶指令碼或套件,僅為說明性指示。

Conventional Commit Messages

Follow these conventions when creating commits.

Prerequisites

Before committing, ensure you're working on a feature branch, not the main branch.

bash
# Check current branchgit branch --show-current

If you're on main or master, create a new branch first:

bash
# Create and switch to a new branchgit checkout -b <type>/<short-description>

Branch naming should follow the pattern: <type>/<short-description> where type matches the commit type (e.g., feat/add-user-auth, fix/null-pointer-error, refactor/extract-validation).

Format

<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>

The header is required. Scope is optional. All lines must stay under 100 characters.

Commit Types

TypePurpose
buildBuild system or CI changes
choreRoutine maintenance tasks
ciContinuous integration configuration
depsDependency updates
docsDocumentation changes
featNew feature
fixBug fix
perfPerformance improvement
refactorCode refactoring (no behavior change)
revertRevert a previous commit
styleCode style and formatting
testTests added, updated or improved

Subject Line Rules

  • Use imperative, present tense: "add feature" not "added feature"
  • Do not capitalize the first letter
  • No period at the end
  • Maximum 70 characters

Body Guidelines

  • Explain what and why, not how
  • Use imperative mood and present tense
  • Include motivation for the change
  • Contrast with previous behavior when relevant

Conventional Commits

The commit contains the following structural elements, to communicate intent to the consumers of your library:

  • fix: a commit of the type fix patches a bug in your codebase (this correlates with PATCH in Semantic Versioning).
  • feat: a commit of the type feat introduces a new feature to the codebase (this correlates with MINOR in Semantic Versioning).
  • BREAKING CHANGE: a commit that has a footer BREAKING CHANGE:, or appends a ! after the type/scope, introduces a breaking API change (correlating with MAJOR in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type.
  • types other than fix: and feat: are allowed, for example @commitlint/config-conventional (based on the Angular convention) recommends build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:, and others.
  • footers other than BREAKING CHANGE: <description> may be provided and follow a convention similar to git trailer format.

Examples

Simple fix

fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint
The user API could return null for deleted accounts, causing a crashin the dashboard. Add null check before accessing user properties.

Feature with scope

feat(alerts): add Slack thread replies for alert updates
When an alert is updated or resolved, post a reply to the originalSlack thread instead of creating a new message. This keeps relatednotifications grouped together.

Refactor

refactor: extract common validation logic to shared module
Move duplicate validation code from three endpoints into a sharedvalidator class. No behavior change.

Breaking change

feat(api)!: remove deprecated v1 endpoints
Remove all v1 API endpoints that were deprecated in version 23.1.Clients should migrate to v2 endpoints.
BREAKING CHANGE: v1 endpoints no longer available

Revert Format

revert: feat(api): add new endpoint
This reverts commit abc123def456.
Reason: Caused performance regression in production.

Principles

  • Each commit should be a single, stable change
  • Commits should be independently reviewable
  • The repository should be in a working state after each commit

References

來源與署名

來源:marcelorodrigo/agent-skills位於skills/conventional-commit提交99d5094

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架