Domain Modeling

作者 mattpocockc55ee46073ed無授權條款收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

AI 產生的概覽

透過維護 CONTEXT.md 詞彙表與記錄 ADR,建立並精煉專案的領域模型。

功能
此技能引導代理在設計過程中主動建立專案的領域模型。它會質疑衝突或含糊的術語,以具體的邊界情境壓力測試領域關係,並將使用者陳述的行為與程式碼交叉比對。它會產出並更新記錄標準術語的 CONTEXT.md 詞彙表,並在必要時依隨附的格式參考於 docs/adr 下撰寫架構決策記錄(ADR)。
適用情境
適用於討論或釐清程式庫術語、撰寫或編輯 CONTEXT.md 詞彙表,以及記錄或編輯 ADR 的情境。它適合正在修改而非僅僅閱讀領域模型的作業階段。
執行需求
無需指令碼,僅為說明性內容。它引用隨附的格式文件(CONTEXT-FORMAT.md、ADR-FORMAT.md)與一份代理設定檔,並會讀寫 CONTEXT.md、docs/adr 等專案檔案。

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading CONTEXT.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/├── CONTEXT.md├── docs/│   └── adr/│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md└── src/

If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/├── CONTEXT-MAP.md├── docs/│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions├── src/│   ├── ordering/│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions│   └── billing/│       ├── CONTEXT.md│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"

Update CONTEXT.md inline

When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.

CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

來源與署名

來源:mattpocock/skills位於skills/engineering/domain-modeling提交c55ee46

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架