Review

作者 parcadeid07ff4b06b62無授權條款3.9K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫8 個月前更新

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

僅含說明Software Development
AI 產生的概覽

執行多視角程式碼審查流程，平行進行專項審查並給出最終綜合結論。

功能
此技能定義一套程式碼審查流程，將審查工作平行分派給多個專項代理，分別關注程式碼品質、架構一致性與變更影響。接著由綜合代理彙整各項發現，給出 APPROVE、REQUEST_CHANGES 或 NEEDS_DISCUSSION 的最終結論，並列出依優先順序排列的阻擋與非阻擋事項。它也說明了完整審查、快速審查、安全專項審查與拉取請求審查等模式。
適用情境
適用於被要求審查程式碼、拉取請求或合併前的實作，或需要設置品質關卡的場合。也適合針對重要變更取得回饋與風險評估的要求。
執行需求
僅為說明性指示，未包含指令碼。它假定執行環境支援依指定代理類型（critic、plan-reviewer、review-agent，以及選用的 aegis）分派子代理任務，並支援背景執行。

/review - Code Review Workflow

Multi-perspective code review with parallel specialists.

When to Use

  • "Review this code"
  • "Review my PR"
  • "Check this before I merge"
  • "Get feedback on implementation"
  • Before merging significant changes
  • Quality gates

Workflow Overview

         ┌──────────┐         │  critic  │ ─┐         │ (code)   │  │         └──────────┘  │                       │         ┌──────────┐  │      ┌──────────────┐         │plan-reviewer│ ─┼────▶ │ review-agent │         │ (plan)   │  │      │ (synthesis)  │         └──────────┘  │      └──────────────┘                       │         ┌──────────┐  │         │plan-reviewer│ ─┘         │ (change) │         └──────────┘
         Parallel                Sequential         perspectives            synthesis

Agent Sequence

#AgentFocusExecution
1criticCode quality, patterns, readabilityParallel
1plan-reviewerArchitecture, plan adherenceParallel
1plan-reviewerChange impact, risk assessmentParallel
2review-agentSynthesize all reviews, final verdictAfter 1

Review Perspectives

  • critic: Is this good code? (Style, patterns, readability)
  • plan-reviewer: Does this match the design? (Architecture, plan)
  • plan-reviewer: Is this change safe? (Risk, impact, regressions)
  • review-agent: Overall assessment and recommendations

Execution

Phase 1: Parallel Reviews

# Code quality reviewTask(  subagent_type="critic",  prompt="""  Review code quality: [SCOPE]
  Evaluate:  - Code style and consistency  - Design patterns used  - Readability and maintainability  - Error handling  - Test coverage
  Output: List of issues with severity (critical/major/minor)  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Architecture reviewTask(  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",  prompt="""  Review architecture alignment: [SCOPE]
  Check:  - Follows established patterns  - Matches implementation plan (if exists)  - Consistent with system design  - No architectural violations
  Output: Alignment assessment with concerns  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Change impact reviewTask(  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",  prompt="""  Review change impact: [SCOPE]
  Assess:  - Risk level of changes  - Affected systems/components  - Backward compatibility  - Potential regressions  - Security implications
  Output: Risk assessment with recommendations  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Wait for all parallel reviews[Check TaskOutput for all three]

Phase 2: Synthesis

Task(  subagent_type="review-agent",  prompt="""  Synthesize reviews for: [SCOPE]
  Reviews:  - critic: [code quality findings]  - plan-reviewer: [architecture findings]  - plan-reviewer: [change impact findings]
  Create final review:  - Overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION)  - Prioritized action items  - Blocking vs non-blocking issues  - Summary for PR description  """)

Review Modes

Full Review

User: /review→ All four agents, comprehensive review

Quick Review

User: /review --quick→ critic only, fast feedback

Security Focus

User: /review --security→ Add aegis (security agent) to parallel phase

PR Review

User: /review PR #123→ Fetch PR diff, review changes

Example

User: /review the authentication changes
Claude: Starting /review workflow...
Phase 1: Running parallel reviews...┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ critic: Reviewing code quality...          ││ plan-reviewer: Checking architecture...         ││ plan-reviewer: Assessing change impact...         │└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
critic: Found 2 issues- [minor] Inconsistent error messages in auth.ts- [major] Missing input validation in login()
plan-reviewer: ✅ Matches authentication plan
plan-reviewer: Medium risk- Affects: login, signup, password reset- Breaking change: session token format
Phase 2: Synthesizing...
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ Review Summary                              │├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES                    ││                                             ││ Blocking:                                   ││ 1. Add input validation to login()          ││                                             ││ Non-blocking:                               ││ 2. Standardize error messages               ││                                             ││ Notes:                                      ││ - Document session token format change      ││ - Consider migration path for existing      ││   sessions                                  │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Verdicts

  • APPROVE: Ready to merge, all issues are minor
  • REQUEST_CHANGES: Blocking issues must be fixed
  • NEEDS_DISCUSSION: Architectural decisions need input

來源與署名

來源：parcadei/continuous-claude-v3位於.claude/skills/review提交d07ff4b

授權條款： 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架

更多來自 parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 的技能

Tldr Stats

parcadei

顯示工作階段 token 用量、API 費用、TLDR 壓縮節省金額與 hook 活動的儀表板。

Data & Analytics3.9K8 個月前更新

Wiring

parcadei

指導驗證已建置的基礎設施元件是否真的被呼叫，而非成為死程式碼。

Software Development3.9K8 個月前更新

Workflow Router

parcadei

將使用者的目標路由到對應的專家代理與資源層級，用於研究、規劃、建置或修復任務。

AI & Agents3.9K8 個月前更新

Validate Agent

parcadei

依據當前最佳實務驗證技術方案中的技術選型，並產出驗證交接文件。

Software Development3.9K8 個月前更新

Tour

parcadei

當使用者詢問能力時，提供友善的入門導覽，概述代理能做什麼。

AI & Agents3.9K8 個月前更新

Tldr Overview

parcadei

使用 TLDR 工具鏈產生節省 token 的專案概覽，涵蓋檔案樹、程式結構、呼叫圖與複雜度。

Software Development3.9K8 個月前更新

更多Software Development技能

Playground

anthropics

精選

建立自成一體的互動式 HTML 遊樂場，包含控制項、即時預覽與可複製的提示詞輸出。

Software Development37K今天更新

M5 Onboard

anthropics

精選

透過 USB 偵測 M5Stack ESP32 開發板，燒錄 UIFlow 2.0 韌體並安裝 MicroPython 應用程式套件。

Software Development37K今天更新

Cardputer Buddy

anthropics

精選

指導迭代 Cardputer-Adv 的 MicroPython 應用程式套件：新增應用程式、透過 USB 序列埠推送檔案、查看日誌並執行 REPL 指令。

Software Development37K今天更新

Web Design Guidelines

vercel-labs

精選

依據從遠端來源取得的 Web Interface Guidelines 審查 UI 程式碼，並以 file:line 形式回報問題。

Software Development32K5 週前更新

Vercel React Native Skills

vercel-labs

精選

React Native 與 Expo 最佳實務規則，涵蓋清單效能、動畫、導覽、UI 模式、狀態與 monorepo 設定。

Software Development32K5 週前更新

Vercel React Best Practices

vercel-labs

精選

Vercel 的 React 與 Next.js 效能指南，以 70 條規則的形式用於撰寫、審查與重構程式碼。

Software Development32K5 週前更新