Qa Start

petrkindlmann/qa-skills/skills/qa-start

作者 petrkindlmannb3bb61bd268bMIT168 個星標收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日儲存庫4 個月前更新

Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.

AI 產生的概覽

依序串接三個技能,為尚無 QA 的專案建立品質保障基礎。

功能
這個啟動器本身不含 QA 指引內容,而是依序串接 qa-project-context、test-strategy 與 test-planning 三個技能。第一步產生專案脈絡檔案,記錄技術堆疊、測試框架、CI/CD、環境、覆蓋率目標、風險領域與團隊結構。第二步產出策略文件,涵蓋測試金字塔、進入與退出準則、工具選擇、環境涵蓋範圍,以及 CI 與發布的品質閘門。第三步產出第一份測試計畫,將功能對應到測試案例,並設定涵蓋優先順序、工作量估算與範圍界線。
適用情境
適用於全新專案且沒有測試基礎設施、既有程式庫完全沒有 QA 設置,或測試被刪除、覆蓋率崩落後需要重建 QA 的情況。不適用於為已有測試的團隊導入 QA 工程師(應使用 qa-project-bootstrap),也不適用於沒有明確符合技能時的路由(應使用 qa-do)。
執行需求
不含指令稿,僅為說明文件。跨工具,已在 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 與 Gemini CLI 上測試。會讀寫使用者的專案根目錄,無需網路存取。依賴相關技能 qa-project-context、test-strategy 與 test-planning 可用。

<objective>

A sequenced launcher for bootstrapping QA where none exists. It contains no QA guidance itself — it chains three skills in the correct order so engineers don't jump to writing tests before deciding what to test or why. Run qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning and you end with a context file, a strategy document, and a first test plan: a complete QA foundation.

</objective>

When to Use This

Reach for qa-start whenever the answer to "where do we start with QA?" is unclear and no QA foundation exists yet:

  • A brand-new project with no test infrastructure.
  • Joining an existing codebase that has no QA setup at all — old code, but quality work was never formalized. Still qa-start, not qa-project-bootstrap (that one is for joining a team that already has tests).
  • Rebooting QA after neglect — tests deleted, coverage collapsed, no strategy. You are rebooting QA from the foundation up.

If the codebase already has a real test suite and you are a QA engineer ramping onto the team, use qa-project-bootstrap instead.

Quick Route

Pick your entry point — skip any step whose artifact already exists.

SituationStart at
No QA at all (no context file, no strategy, no plan)Step 1
.agents/qa-project-context.md already populatedSkip Step 1 — invoke test-strategy (Step 2)
Context file AND strategy document both existSkip Steps 1 and 2 — invoke test-planning (Step 3)
All three done — what next?After Step 3
A QA engineer ramping onto an existing team with existing testsNot this skill — see qa-project-bootstrap

Step 1: Capture Project Context

Skill: qa-project-context

Creates .agents/qa-project-context.md in your project root. That file records your tech stack, test frameworks, CI/CD pipeline, environments, coverage goals, risk areas, and team structure. Every later skill reads it, so it never asks you the same questions twice.

What to do: Invoke qa-project-context and work through its discovery questions. The skill walks each section interactively, discovers what it can from the repo, and writes the file.

Done when: .agents/qa-project-context.md exists in your project root with all sections filled in. It is the source of truth for everything that follows.

Step 2: Create the Test Strategy

Skill: test-strategy

Produces a strategy document defining how the project approaches quality: the test pyramid (what proportion of unit, integration, and E2E tests fits your product), entry and exit criteria, tool selection, environment coverage, and quality gates for CI and release.

What to do: Invoke test-strategy once Step 1 is complete. It reads the context file automatically and will not re-ask anything answered there.

Done when: You have a strategy document (e.g. strategy.md) covering test-pyramid rationale, tool choices with justification, quality gates for CI and release, and entry/exit criteria per test type. One page of clear decisions beats a sprawling template.

Step 3: Build the First Test Plan

Skill: test-planning

Translates the strategy into an actionable plan for the first sprint or release. Maps features to test cases, assigns effort, and decides what gets covered first versus deferred.

What to do: Invoke test-planning after Step 2. It consumes the strategy from Step 2 and the context from Step 1. Provide the feature list or sprint scope when prompted.

Done when: You have a test plan (e.g. plan.md) with features mapped to test cases, coverage priorities set, effort estimated, and scope boundaries clear. This is the artifact your team executes against.

After Step 3

You now hold the foundation: context, strategy, and a first plan. Next actions depend on your stack — this launcher is not the final step.

  • First automated tests: Use playwright-automation or cypress-automation to write the first E2E tests against your highest-risk flows.
  • CI integration: Use ci-cd-integration to get tests running on every pull request.
  • Tracking quality: Use qa-metrics once the suite runs to define what health looks like and how to measure it over time.

qa-start vs qa-project-bootstrap vs qa-do

The single most common routing confusion, answered in one place:

  • qa-start — bootstrap QA where none exists. New project, or QA was deleted and you are rebooting it. Sequence: context → strategy → first plan. Output is the QA foundation.
  • qa-project-bootstrap — a 30-day ramp for a QA engineer joining an existing team with existing tests. Covers team processes, onboarding timeline, and an audit of the test suite already in place. Use it after a foundation exists, not to create one.
  • qa-do — last-resort router for "which skill do I use?" when nothing clearly matches. If you already know you have no QA, skip it and run qa-start.

A brand-new project with no QA — even on an old codebase — is always qa-start, never qa-project-bootstrap.

Pin as a Manual Command

Re-run anytime from the Claude Code /skills menu.

To pin this skill as a manual-only command, add disable-model-invocation: true to the frontmatter, or set it via skillOverrides in .claude/settings.local.json.

Caveat: in some Claude Code builds disable-model-invocation: true also suppresses the manual slash command (ref anthropics/claude-code#26251). If you still want to invoke /qa-start by hand, set the skillOverrides state to user-invocable-only instead.

Related Skills

  • qa-project-context — Step 1. Captures project setup, tech stack, and quality goals into .agents/qa-project-context.md.
  • test-strategy — Step 2. Defines the testing approach, pyramid, tools, and quality gates.
  • test-planning — Step 3. Builds the first test plan with features mapped to test cases.
  • qa-project-bootstrap — go here instead when a QA engineer is ramping onto an existing team with existing tests; this skill creates the foundation, bootstrap onboards onto one.
  • qa-do — last-resort router when no skill clearly matches; not needed if you already know there is no QA.
  • playwright-automation / cypress-automation — after the plan, write the first E2E tests against your highest-risk flows.

來源與署名

來源:petrkindlmann/qa-skills位於skills/qa-start提交b3bb61b

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架

更多來自 petrkindlmann/qa-skills 的技能

Visual Testing

petrkindlmann

指導使用 Playwright 截圖以及 Chromatic、Percy、Argos CI 等託管工具進行視覺回歸測試。

Software Development1684 個月前更新

Unit Testing

petrkindlmann

指導使用 Jest、Vitest 與 pytest 撰寫有效的單元測試,涵蓋測試替身、覆蓋率門檻、快照、假計時器與突變測試。

Software Development1684 個月前更新

Test Suite Curation

petrkindlmann

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

待分類1684 個月前更新

Test Strategy

petrkindlmann

Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.

待分類1684 個月前更新

Test Planning

petrkindlmann

為單一衝刺或發佈建立一頁式測試計畫,涵蓋涵蓋映射、工作量估算、優先順序排序、資源分配與排程。

Productivity & Workflow1684 個月前更新

Test Migration

petrkindlmann

指導測試套件在不同框架之間增量移轉,例如 Selenium、Cypress 或 Jest 移轉到 Playwright 或 Vitest,並支援平行 CI。

Software Development1684 個月前更新