Planetscale Vitess Safety Review

planetscale/skills/planetscale-vitess-safety-review

作者 planetscale999045cfbad7無授權條款133 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫昨天更新

Review a PlanetScale Vitess database for safe migrations, deploy requests, schema recommendations, Insights, webhooks, and operational safety.

AI 產生的概覽

審查 PlanetScale Vitess 資料庫的遷移、部署請求、結構、Insights 和 webhook 安全狀況並提出建議。

功能
評估 PlanetScale Vitess 資料庫的生產安全設定,涵蓋安全遷移、部署請求、結構還原、分支策略、Query Insights、異常、結構建議、備份和分片。它會產出一份書面審查,包含目前狀況、缺少的安全功能、建議工作流程、webhook 訂閱、結構建議分類表和部署安全缺口。它只提出變更建議,不套用任何變更。
適用情境
適用於在結構變更前後評估或改善 PlanetScale Vitess 資料庫的維運安全性。也適用於稽核部署請求工作流程、webhook 涵蓋範圍和代理安全自動化實務。
執行需求
僅包含說明;無指令碼。需要存取 PlanetScale Vitess 資料庫的設定、Insights 和 webhook 設定以執行審查。

Vitess safety review

Purpose

Recommend best practices for a PlanetScale Vitess database. Focus on production safety, deployability, observability, and agent-safe automation. Do not apply any changes.

Primary safety features to evaluate

Safe migrations

Check whether safe migrations are enabled on production and staging branches.

Recommend enabling safe migrations when:

  • The branch receives production traffic.
  • The team runs DDL outside deploy requests.
  • There is no protected branch workflow.
  • The application is expected to evolve schema frequently.

Explain the tradeoff: safe migrations reject direct DDL on protected branches and force schema changes through deploy requests. That is a feature, but it can break teams relying on direct production DDL. Treat enablement as a behavior-changing change requiring approval.

Deploy requests

Check:

  • Whether deploy requests are used for schema changes.
  • Whether administrator approval is required.
  • Whether deploy requests are reviewed for data loss, conflicts, lint errors, foreign key problems, charset issues, and shard impact.
  • Whether teams use gated deployments for cutover control.
  • Whether “deploy instantly” is used and whether the team understands it removes the gated-deployment/revert shape.
  • Whether cutover is regularly delayed by long-running transactions.
  • Whether deploy request events are subscribed to via webhooks.

Recommend:

  • Require deploy requests for production schema changes.
  • Enable administrator approval for production deploy requests when there is more than one administrator.
  • In a single-admin organization, administrator approval does not stop an agent that acts as that admin: the admin who opens a deploy request can also approve it. If the goal is to keep agents from self-approving, give the agent a separate user, or a service token without deploy request approval permission.
  • Prefer normal safe deployments over instant deployments unless the migration is known to be instant-safe and the rollback story is acceptable.
  • Use gated deployment when cutover timing matters.
  • Treat “force cutover now” as an operator-controlled action for delayed cutovers: it aggressively stops running transactions to complete schema cutover. Recommend reviewing the blocking workload and incident context before use, and only recommend the database-level aggressive cutover default when frequent cutover blocking is understood and accepted.

Schema revert

Check whether the team knows the revert window and whether their incident runbook includes it.

Recommend documenting:

  • How to identify a bad schema migration.
  • How to revert within the supported window.
  • Who is authorized to revert.
  • Which application deploy should be rolled back together with the schema revert.

Branch strategy

Recommend a branch topology:

  • main or equivalent production branch with safe migrations enabled.
  • staging branch based from production with safe migrations enabled.
  • Short-lived development branches based from staging.
  • Deploy requests from development to staging, then staging to production when appropriate.

Do not create branches without approval.

Query Insights

Review Insights for:

  • Slow queries.
  • Queries reading too many rows.
  • Erroring queries.
  • Queries with poor index usage.
  • For sharded databases, whether query patterns use relevant vindexes and how vindex usage changes after index or routing changes.
  • Unusual query volume.
  • Missing SQL comment tags.
  • Tag breakdowns when built-in metadata or SQLCommenter tags are present: tag:key:value filtering in the dashboard, and the insights/tags and insights/tags/summaries API endpoints for programmatic breakdowns.
  • Deploy correlation data.

Recommend enabling or improving application query tagging so Insights can attribute queries to app, route, controller, action, job, deployment SHA, and feature.

Anomalies

Review active and recent anomalies.

Recommend:

  • Subscribe branch.anomaly webhooks to the team’s alerting or automation system.
  • Route anomaly payloads to a triage workflow that opens an issue or agent task.
  • Correlate anomalies with deploy requests, application deploys, and query tags.
  • Do not automatically apply schema or code changes from anomaly events; generate a proposal or PR only.

Schema recommendations

Review open schema recommendations.

For each recommendation, capture:

  • Type: add index, remove redundant index, primary key exhaustion, unused table, legacy charset/collation, or other.
  • Affected table and keyspace.
  • Supporting query telemetry.
  • DDL.
  • Expected benefit.
  • Risk.
  • Test plan.

Recommend implementation path:

  • Convert the recommendation into an application migration or PlanetScale branch schema change.
  • Open a deploy request.
  • Review generated DDL and shard impact.
  • Benchmark or validate on a branch.
  • Deploy with safe migrations.
  • Monitor Insights and anomaly state after deployment.

Do not apply recommendations directly.

Backups and restore

Check backup posture and restore runbooks.

Recommend:

  • Verify automated backups exist.
  • Run a non-production restore drill periodically.
  • Document restore target, RPO/RTO expectation, and application cutover plan.
  • For sharded databases, document shard-aware restore expectations.

Sharding and keyspace safety

If the database is sharded, review:

  • Keyspaces and shards.
  • Vschema.
  • Cross-shard query patterns.
  • Whether schema deploy requests show per-shard impact.
  • Whether queries use shard-friendly access paths.

Recommend an agent-safe sharding review only as a proposal. Never reshard, change vschema, or alter routing automatically.

Webhook recommendations for Vitess

Evaluate and recommend webhooks for:

  • branch.anomaly
  • branch.primary_promoted
  • branch.ready
  • branch.sleeping
  • cluster.storage
  • keyspace.storage
  • deploy_request.opened
  • deploy_request.queued
  • deploy_request.in_progress
  • deploy_request.pending_cutover
  • deploy_request.schema_applied
  • deploy_request.errored
  • deploy_request.reverted
  • deploy_request.closed
  • branch.schema_recommendation if available in the webhook API for the customer’s database

Recommended destinations:

  • Alerting for anomaly, primary promotion, storage, and deploy errors.
  • Slack or internal notifications for deploy request lifecycle.
  • Agent intake queue for schema recommendations and anomalies, with PR-only output by default.

Output

Return:

  • Current Vitess safety posture.
  • Missing safety features.
  • Recommended workflow.
  • Recommended webhook subscriptions.
  • Schema recommendation triage table.
  • Deploy safety gaps.
  • Proposed changes requiring approval.

End with:

“No Vitess changes have been applied.”

來源與署名

來源:planetscale/skills位於planetscale-vitess-safety-review提交999045c

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架