Develop Design Rationale

product-on-purpose/pm-skills/skills/develop-design-rationale

作者 product-on-purpose1cef1a9eae10017389863d51e289e0ae41e17fcbApache-2.0收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日

Documents the reasoning behind design decisions including alternatives considered, trade-offs evaluated, and principles applied. Use when making significant UX decisions, aligning with stakeholders on design direction, or preserving design context for future reference.

AI 產生的概覽

記錄設計決策背後的理由,涵蓋背景、替代方案、取捨與後續考量。

功能
引導代理產出一份設計理由文件,記錄某項設計決策為何如此做成。流程包括陳述決策、描述背景與限制、列出考慮過的替代方案、定義評估準則、解釋推理過程、記錄已接受的取捨,並註明後續考量。輸出依循範本,涵蓋決策摘要、背景、替代方案、評估、決策理由、取捨、可逆性、後續考量、佐證資料與決策歷程。
適用情境
適用於做出需要論證的重要使用者體驗或設計決策時、在設計審查前準備利害關係人討論時,或為未來團隊成員保留設計背景時。也適用於回顧過往決策或記錄設計系統樣式選擇。
執行需求
無需指令碼或特殊工具,僅為說明性技能。它會引用技能資料夾中內附的範本與範例文件。
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Design Rationale

A design rationale document captures the "why" behind design decisions.the context, constraints, alternatives considered, and reasoning that led to a particular solution. While designs themselves show what was built, rationale documents preserve institutional knowledge about why it was built that way.

When to Use

  • When making significant UX decisions that affect user experience
  • Before design reviews to prepare stakeholder discussions
  • When multiple valid approaches exist and the choice needs justification
  • To onboard new team members to existing design decisions
  • When revisiting past decisions to understand original reasoning
  • During design system evolution to document pattern choices

When NOT to Use

  • The decision is architectural or a technology selection -> use develop-adr (Nygard format)
  • You need stakeholder alignment on the overall solution direction -> use develop-solution-brief
  • You are documenting exploration findings rather than a decision -> use develop-spike-summary
  • The decision is trivially reversible and low-stakes: a rationale document adds ceremony; record the reasoning in the PR or ticket instead

Instructions

When asked to document design rationale, follow these steps:

  1. State the Decision Begin with a clear, one-sentence summary of what design decision was made. This becomes the title and reference point for the document.

  2. Describe the Context Explain the situation that prompted this decision. What problem were you solving? What constraints existed? What user needs informed the direction? Include relevant research findings.

  3. List Options Considered Document at least 2-3 alternatives that were evaluated. For each option, describe what it would look like and its key characteristics. Be fair to all options.avoid strawmen.

  4. Define Evaluation Criteria Specify how options were assessed: usability heuristics, technical feasibility, brand alignment, user research findings, business requirements, or design principles.

  5. Explain the Reasoning Walk through why the chosen option best meets the criteria. Be explicit about trade-offs.what you gained and what you sacrificed. Acknowledge where the decision is reversible vs. irreversible.

  6. Document Trade-offs Accepted Every design decision involves trade-offs. Name what you gave up and why it was acceptable. This honesty helps future teams understand constraints.

  7. Note Follow-up Considerations Capture anything that needs attention later: metrics to watch, conditions that might warrant revisiting the decision, or related decisions to make.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete rationale fills every template section: Decision Summary; Context; Options Considered; Evaluation; Decision Rationale; Trade-offs Accepted; Reversibility; Follow-up Considerations; Supporting Materials; and Decision History.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Decision is clearly stated in one sentence
  • Context explains the "why now" and constraints
  • Multiple alternatives are documented fairly
  • Evaluation criteria are explicit
  • Reasoning addresses why chosen option beats alternatives
  • Trade-offs are honestly acknowledged
  • A reader who inherits this design can reconstruct why the chosen option won without asking anyone

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

來源與署名

來源:product-on-purpose/pm-skills位於skills/develop-design-rationale提交1cef1a9

授權條款: Apache-2.0

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架