Case Review

zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/skills/case-review

作者 zhaoxuya520cab634bd855f無授權條款40K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日儲存庫2 週前更新

Reviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.

包含腳本Security
AI 產生的概覽

審查既有的逆向或鑑識案例包,檢查範圍就緒度、證據可追溯性與工件雜湊完整性。

功能
此技能以唯讀方式審查既有的 work/ / 案例包,檢查範圍中繼資料、證據記錄結構、工作項目與時間軸項目對證據的參照、結構化 Finding 與 Path,以及選用的 SHA-256 工件驗證。它會執行一支唯讀的 Python 指令碼,輸出 Markdown 或 JSON 審查結果,嚴格模式會把警告視為交付阻擋項目。它不會進行偵察、利用、動態插樁或任何針對目標的變更。
適用情境
當逆向工程、鑑識、CTF 或經授權的安全案例需要可辯護的交付,且案例包已經存在時使用。適用於正式報告或專家交付前的審查、可追溯性檢查與完整性驗證。
執行需求
需要 Python 3.9 或更新版本,僅使用標準函式庫;不需要網路存取或第三方套件。技能附帶可執行的審查指令碼與測試指令碼。案例目錄需包含 scope.md、timeline.md、workitems.md 和 evidence/。文件另提到一個選用的 PowerShell 證據輔助指令碼,用來記錄雜湊。

Evidence Graph Review

Use this skill when a reverse engineering, forensics, CTF, or authorized security case needs a defensible handoff. It audits the existing work/<case>/ package without changing the case or touching a target.

Scope

This skill covers:

  • Scope metadata and target-activity readiness
  • Evidence record structure and reproducibility fields
  • References from work items and timeline entries to Evidence
  • Structured Findings and Paths in report Markdown
  • Optional SHA-256 verification for case-local artifacts
  • A Markdown or JSON review result for a report handoff

It MUST NOT perform reconnaissance, exploitation, dynamic instrumentation, or target changes. Those actions belong to the routed analysis skill and require the case scope gate.

ACTION REQUIRED

  1. NOW: read ../field-journal/precedent-reverse.md and confirm that this is a review of an existing authorized case package.
  2. NOW: confirm the case path and choose read-only review mode.
  3. NEXT: read ../tool-index.md; this skill uses only Python 3 standard library and does not require bootstrap.
  4. NEXT: run python3 scripts/review_case.py <case-root> --format markdown.
  5. ACT: resolve every error, then rerun the review before claiming a handoff is complete.

Tool dependencies

ToolRequiredPurposeAuto-bootstrap
Python 3.9+YesRuns the read-only case review scriptNo, use the platform Python installation

No network access or third-party package is required.

Workflow

Phase 1: Intake

Run the review against the existing case directory:

bash
python3 skills/case-review/scripts/review_case.py work/<case> --format markdown

Confirm that scope.md, timeline.md, workitems.md, and evidence/ are present. A non-strict review reports scope warnings while a strict review treats warnings as handoff blockers.

建议下一步(选一个编号)

  1. 修复 scope.md 中的授权、范围或 network_profile 字段
  2. 继续检查 Evidence 记录的可复现命令和来源
  3. 导出当前 review 结果并附到阶段性报告
  4. 换 JSON 输出接入 CI 或其他审查工具
  5. 暂停,先确认审查范围

Phase 2: Traceability

Review the checks for:

  • Evidence IDs that do not exist
  • Findings without evidence_ids
  • Paths without an allowed path_type or Evidence reference
  • Work items and timeline entries pointing to unknown Evidence
  • Unlinked Evidence records
  • Validated Findings with low confidence

An offline observation may use repro_command: n/a only when its notes field explicitly documents the offline limitation.

Use JSON when another tool needs stable fields:

bash
python3 skills/case-review/scripts/review_case.py work/<case> --format json

建议下一步(选一个编号)

  1. 补写缺失的 Evidence,并保留原始命令
  2. 将候选 Finding 绑定到 Evidence 后重新审查
  3. 为调用链或攻击链补充 P-id 和 Path 步骤
  4. 生成 Markdown handoff summary
  5. 换回 PRIMARY skill 继续分析

Phase 3: Fixity verification

When an Evidence record contains both content_hash and artifact_path, verify the case-local artifact:

bash
python3 skills/case-review/scripts/review_case.py work/<case> --verify-hashes --strict

The script accepts sha256:<64 hex characters> and checks that the artifact remains inside the case root. A hash mismatch is a hard failure.

The PowerShell Evidence helper can record a hash while appending a record:

powershell
powershell -File skills/scripts/append-evidence.ps1 -CaseRoot work\<case> -Id E-001 -Title "Sample hash" -ReproCommand "sha256sum evidence/sample.bin" -ArtifactPath "evidence\sample.bin"

建议下一步(选一个编号)

  1. 修复 hash mismatch 或替换已污染的工作副本
  2. 为未固定的原始文件补充 SHA-256 和 artifact_path
  3. 继续进入报告生成阶段
  4. 导出 JSON 结果供 CI 保存
  5. 暂停并请求人工复核

Phase 4: Handoff

Use strict mode before a final report or specialist handoff:

bash
python3 skills/case-review/scripts/review_case.py work/<case> --strict --format markdown > work/<case>/report/case-review.md

The command is read-only with respect to the case unless shell redirection is explicitly used to save its output. The review is not legal advice and does not replace organizational evidence handling procedures.

建议下一步(选一个编号)

  1. 将通过的 review 结果交给 docs-generator/ 生成正式报告
  2. 回到 PRIMARY skill 补齐新的分析证据
  3. 归档 Markdown 和 JSON review 结果
  4. 暂停并请求人工复核

Language behavior contract

  • Internal reasoning, tool selection, and phase control: English.
  • User-visible messages, section labels, reports, and next-step menus: Chinese unless the user requests another language.
  • Default bilingual labels place Chinese first and English second, separated by /.

Bootstrap boundary

This skill has no third-party dependency. If Python 3 is unavailable, the only allowed recovery action is the repository bootstrap path when a Python capability is registered for the current platform. If no such capability is registered, stop and report the missing runtime. Do not guess executable paths, download packages, or perform a manual install from inside this skill.

Routing context

Upstream entry: any reverse, forensics, CTF, or authorized security skill that has produced a case package.

Downstream exit: docs-generator/ for a formal report, or the original PRIMARY skill when the graph is incomplete.

Related modules: ops/evidence-finding-path.md, ops/timeline-workitem.md, digital-forensics/, reverse-engineering/, and docs-generator/.

References

任务完成自检

  • 我是否审查了 scope.md、timeline.md、workitems.md 和 evidence/?
  • 所有 Finding 是否引用了现存 Evidence?
  • 所有 Path 是否包含合法 path_type 和 Evidence 引用?
  • 是否执行了 hash verification,或记录了未执行原因?
  • 是否以 strict 模式重新运行并保存了 review 结果?

來源與署名

來源:zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill位於skills/case-review提交cab634b

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架