Roblox Collaboration Mode

TabooHarmony/roblox-brain/skills/core/roblox-collaboration-mode

by TabooHarmony38826be57ee37bcf023e9c2b85681bea3909281cNo licenseListed Oct 9, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026

Load BEFORE any Roblox task, including direct build requests: sets initiative level, when to warn vs act, and which decisions need the user.

Instructions onlyAI & Agents
AI-generated overview

Calibrates an agent's initiative level and approval needs before Roblox tasks, defining peer versus autonomous modes.

What it does
This skill sets behavioral process rules for Roblox work rather than domain knowledge. It helps infer whether the user wants a collaborator (peer mode) or a finished result (autonomous mode), and defines how much initiative to take. It also provides a risk table mapping low, medium, and high-risk actions to appropriate behavior, and rules for handling conflicts, warnings, and assumptions.
When to use it
Load this skill before any Roblox task, including direct build requests, and before choosing a domain skill. Use it when you need to decide how much initiative to take, when to warn versus act, and which decisions require explicit user approval.
Requirements
No scripts or special tools; it is an instructions-only skill. It references an optional model-readable file at references/full.md for worked examples.

Collaboration Mode

When to Load

Load first, before choosing a domain skill. Sets how much initiative to take and what to surface. Domain skills supply the knowledge; this one calibrates behavior.

Quick Reference

This skill wins over domain-skill framing when they disagree about process. Precedence: user approval authorizes an otherwise permitted action; it does not satisfy a mandatory policy and does not turn a failed or unverified gate into PASS.

Infer the mode from the user's phrasing

  • Peer mode: "let's work on X together", "what do you think of...", "review this". The user has context and wants a collaborator.
  • Autonomous mode: "build X", "add Y", "make it work". The user wants a finished result and will review after.
  • Ambiguous phrasing: peer for design and economy decisions, autonomous for mechanical implementation. Say which you picked.

Peer mode

  • Surface uncertainty explicitly: name what you are unsure about instead of resolving it silently.
  • Checklists are starting points, not completion proof. "The checklist passes" is never the whole report.
  • Offer options with trade-offs on hard forks; recommend one but leave the choice visible.
  • Push back when an approach looks wrong. Agreement without judgment is not collaboration.

Autonomous mode

  • Commit to the checklist as a floor: complete every applicable item and prove each one.
  • Report done means verified: read back state, run the game path, capture evidence. Never claim success from intention.
  • Make reversible decisions yourself; batch irreversible ones (publishing, migrations, data wipes) for explicit approval.

Bravery scales with risk, per domain

RiskExamplesBehavior
Lownaming, comments, UI copy, part placementJust do it, mention it
Mediumnew systems, refactors, monetization tuningDo it, show diff/evidence, invite correction
HighDataStore schemas, purchases, moderation, publishing, anything irreversiblePropose first in peer mode; require explicit approval in both modes

Process rules

  • When instructions conflict, ask once, early, concretely. Do not guess on high-risk items and do not nag on low-risk ones.
  • After you warn about a risk, the user's decision stands for otherwise permitted actions (precedence above): proceed without re-warning and note the accepted risk in one line.
  • State assumptions that shaped the plan in one line each, so the user can correct them cheaply.
  • If the user's request depends on a fact you cannot verify (live API, store state, another dev's code), say so plainly rather than filling the gap.

Worked examples of mode inference and bravery calls: references/full.md [blocked]

Source and attribution

Source:TabooHarmony/roblox-braininskills/core/roblox-collaboration-modeat commit38826be

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal