Box Legal Workflows

作者 box35567f913a2b无许可证7 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库4周前更新

Shared building blocks for Box-based legal workflows — Box collaboration role definitions, Box AI usage boundaries (what AI must not decide), and reusable human-in-the-loop confirmation phrasings. Referenced by box-legal-workflows-ma, box-legal-workflows-intake, and box-legal-workflows-contract skills.

仅含说明Business & Finance
AI 生成的概览

Box 法律工作流的共享参考模块:协作角色、Box AI 边界与人工确认话术。

功能
为基于 Box 的法律技能(并购、案件受理、合同审查)提供可复用的基础模块。它定义 Box 协作角色与最小权限指引,说明 Box AI 不得作为决策者的情形,并提供可复用的人工确认话术。产出的是参考指引,而非文件或代码。
适用场景
适用于构建或运行需要统一角色定义、AI 使用边界或确认措辞的 Box 法律工作流。它供相关法律技能引用,而非单独使用。
运行要求
需要单独的 box 技能以完成 Box MCP 身份验证、工具选择和基础工作流;不包含脚本。

Shared Legal Concepts

PREREQUISITE: Use the box skill for Box MCP authentication, tool selection, and base workflows. If it is not installed, run: npx skills add https://github.com/box/skills --skill box

Shared building blocks used by the legal skills (M&A, Intake, Contract Review): Box collaboration role definitions, the boundaries of where Box AI must not be the decision-maker, and reusable confirmation phrasings. Risk frameworks, metadata fields, workflows, and decision-transparency requirements live in the individual legal skills.

Box capability references

Reach for these for the underlying Box tool mechanics rather than restating them here:

  • The box skill's references/collaboration.md — collaborator role capabilities, shared links, and external-sharing rules
  • The box skill's references/ai-and-retrieval.md — Box AI Q&A, extraction, and structured metadata tools, with pacing/limits/citations

Box Collaboration Roles

[CONFIRM: What permission level is appropriate?]

For the full breakdown of each Box collaborator role (Co-owner, Editor, Viewer Uploader, Previewer Uploader, Viewer, Previewer, Uploader) and the exact capabilities each grants, see the role matrix in the box skill's references/collaboration.md. Use that matrix to determine which role fits a given collaborator, then have the human confirm the choice before granting access.

Apply least privilege: default to the most restrictive role that still lets the collaborator do their job, prefer specific folders over root access, and set expiration dates on external collaborations.


Box AI Boundaries

Box AI informs; a human attorney decides. Do NOT use Box AI for:

  • Final legal advice or decisions (human attorney only)
  • Access-control decisions (human approves permissions)
  • Client conflict checks (use the firm's conflict system)
  • Privilege determinations (attorney judgment)
  • Settlement negotiations or strategy

Box AI is appropriate for informing humans — completeness checks, risk-factor flagging, metadata extraction, contract comparison, and due-diligence Q&A — always with citations surfaced and a human making the final call.

For details on the Box AI tools available and how to use them, see the box skill's references/ai-and-retrieval.md.


Common Confirmation Patterns

Reusable phrasings for the human-in-the-loop confirmations the legal skills require.

Risk Rating

"Here are the factors I found: [...], with citations from Box. Under your firm's criteria, which rating applies?" (The agent presents facts; the firm's criteria and attorney determine the rating.)

Permissions

"I'll grant [person] [role] access to [folder/file]. They can [permissions]. Proceed?"

Routing

"Based on [practice area/risk/type], I recommend routing to [attorney]. Correct, or assign to someone else?"

Document Completeness

"Firm requires: [list]. Found: [list]. Missing: [list]. Proceed with assessment?"

Metadata Template

"Do you have a Box metadata template for [type]? If yes, scope and template key?"

Thresholds

"What is your firm's threshold for [matter value/expiration alert/risk escalation]?"

External Sharing

"Before sharing with [external party], confirm: (1) Permission level? (2) Folders? (3) Expiration? (4) Link or collaboration?"

来源与署名

来源:box/skills位于skills/box-legal-workflows提交35567f9

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架