Box Legal Workflows Contract

作者 box35567f913a2b无许可证7 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库4周前更新

Automate contract review and monitoring with Box MCP — find new or expiring contracts, compare them against firm templates to flag material variances, write structured contract metadata back to Box for searchability, and produce variance reports with citations. Use this skill when the user mentions contract review or monitoring, NDA or MSA review, contract expiration or renewals, contract metadata, or variance analysis, even if they don't name a specific Box tool.

AI 生成的概览

在 Box 中自动完成合同审查:查找新签或即将到期的合同,与事务所模板比对,写入元数据并生成差异报告。

功能
该技能提供针对合同的审查与监控流程,用于处理存储在 Box 中的协议。它通过元数据或关键词搜索定位合同,使用 Box AI 将每份合同与事务所模板比对,列出存在差异的条款并附引用,同时提取交易对手、日期、续约条款和金额等结构化字段。结果会写回 Box 文件元数据,使合同保持可检索,并上传包含事实差异与引用的差异报告。它还会监控到期时间窗口,并通过评论和协作将事项转交审查律师。
适用场景
当用户提到合同审查或监控、保密协议或主服务协议审查、合同到期或续约、合同元数据或差异分析时使用,即使用户未指明具体的 Box 工具。适用于合同存放在 Box 中且已有或可创建事务所模板的法律运营场景。
运行要求
需要 Box MCP 技能用于身份验证、工具选择和基础工作流,还需要 box-legal-workflows 技能用于协作角色、Box AI 使用边界和确认措辞。使用 Box AI 工具和元数据模板;该技能不附带脚本。

Contract Review Agent

PREREQUISITES:

  • Use the box skill for Box MCP auth, tool selection, and base workflows. If it is not installed, run: npx skills add https://github.com/box/skills --skill box
  • Use the box-legal-workflows skill for Box collaboration role definitions, Box AI usage boundaries, and reusable confirmation phrasings. If it is not installed, run: npx skills add box/skills --skill box-legal-workflows

Do contract review in Box: find contracts with Box search, compare against the firm's template with Box AI, persist results as Box metadata so they stay searchable, and monitor dates with metadata search. This skill is the contract-specific recipe; the underlying Box tool mechanics live in the capability references below. Materiality, risk, and favorability are firm-supplied criteria confirmed by an attorney — the agent extracts facts, stores them, and routes. It does not provide legal advice or decide risk.

Box capability references

Reach for these for tool mechanics rather than restating them here:

  • The box skill's references/mcp-search.md — find contracts; metadata vs. keyword search, folder scoping, template schema lookup
  • The box skill's references/ai-and-retrieval.md — compare to template and extract fields; pacing, text-rep/file limits, citations
  • The box skill's references/content-workflows.md — metadata templates, set_file_metadata, report uploads, file comments
  • The box skill's references/collaboration.md — grant the reviewing attorney access

Box metadata model

Persist review results as file metadata so contracts stay searchable. Find or inspect the firm's template using the box skill's references/mcp-search.md; create one using its references/content-workflows.md if none exists.

  • Representative fields (confirm the firm's actual set): counterparty_name, contract_type, execution_date, effective_date, expiration_date, auto_renewal, notice_period_days, contract_value, governing_law, status (active/expired/terminated/under_negotiation), risk_rating, review_date, next_review_date, expiration_alert_date. Link to matters with matter_id, practice_area, matter_owner.
  • The risk_rating value is the firm/attorney's determination — store it, don't decide it.

Contract search recipes

Once contracts carry metadata, use search_files_metadata (mechanics in the box skill's references/mcp-search.md; otherwise search_files_keyword with date filters):

  • New since last review: execution_date >= 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND execution_date <= 'YYYY-MM-DD'
  • Expiring window: expiration_date >= 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND expiration_date <= 'YYYY-MM-DD' AND status = 'active'
  • By counterparty / rating: counterparty_name = 'Acme Corp' · risk_rating = 'High'

Tool selection

Contract taskToolNotes
Find new contracts (date)search_files_metadataQuery execution_date; fall back to search_files_keyword if no metadata
Find expiringsearch_files_metadataQuery expiration_date within 30/60/90 days
Compare to templateai_qa_multi_fileContract + firm template in one call
Extract metadata (template)ai_extract_structured_from_metadata_templateIf a template exists
Extract metadata (custom)ai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhancedDefine fields at runtime
Write metadataset_file_metadataPersist extracted/confirmed fields
Create variance reportupload_fileWrite the summary doc
Tag attorneycreate_file_commentNotify for review/expiration
Grant attorney accesscreate_collaborationIf they lack access

Workflow

  1. Find: search_files_metadata or search_files_keyword. [CONFIRM: folder ID, date range/cadence]
  2. Compare to template: ai_qa_multi_file (contract + firm template) → extract clauses that differ, with citations. [CONFIRM: template file ID]
  3. Extract metadata: ai_extract_structured_from_metadata_template, or ai_extract_structured_from_fields_enhanced if no template.
  4. Persist: set_file_metadata, including the firm-confirmed risk_rating. [CONFIRM: which fields]
  5. Report: upload_file — factual differences + citations + firm-confirmed rating (observations for attorney review, not recommendations).
  6. Route: create_file_comment to tag the attorney; create_collaboration if they need access. [CONFIRM: attorney, access]
  7. Monitor expirations: search_files_metadata on the expiration window → create_file_comment reminders → set_file_metadata (expiration_alert_sent: yes).

Legal guardrails

Box mechanics (external-sharing confirmation, AI pacing/limits/citations, metadata writes) are governed by the capability references above and box-legal-workflows. Specific to contracts:

  • Risk, materiality, and favorability are firm + attorney calls, never the agent's. If the firm has no documented criteria, route to an attorney rather than rating.
  • Prompt Box AI to extract differences and cite section/page — not to judge materiality or legal risk.
  • Record decisions in Box as the audit trail: the firm-confirmed rating in metadata plus the uploaded summary.

来源与署名

来源:box/skills位于skills/box-legal-workflows-contract提交35567f9

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架