Catchup

LilMGenius/paperthin/skills/coil/catchup

作者 LilMGenius7d5dc6235990230e45a24a25c527d81701da5458无许可证收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日

Rebuild the human's lost context on a project from live state, in plain language: what needs them, what changed, what new words mean. Use when the human returns after a gap, says they can't follow the project anymore, asks what happened or what a term means, or before deciding what to do next when their mental model is stale. Read-only; it briefs, it does not act.

AI 生成的概览

根据项目实时状态,用通俗语言重建使用者丢失的项目背景,形成简短简报。

功能
读取项目实时状态,例如近期文件修改时间、git 历史、计划与状态文档、笔记和任务看板,然后撰写一份简短的重入简报。简报按决策需要排序:哪些事项需要本人处理、自上次接触以来发生了什么变化、新出现的术语是什么意思。该技能为只读,产出的是简报而非改动。
适用场景
适用于使用者隔一段时间后回到项目、表示已经跟不上项目、询问发生了什么或某个术语的含义,或在心智模型已过时的情况下需要先了解情况再决定下一步时。
运行要求
不含脚本,仅为说明性指令。需要对项目实时状态的读取权限,例如文件、git 历史、计划与状态文档、笔记和任务看板。

Catch the human up at their eye level, from state, not from memory.

Goal

catchup is the re-entry point for a lost human. Long agent cycles coin words, rename files, run experiments, and make calls faster than the owner can follow. Before any next action makes sense, the owner's mental model must be reloaded. catchup reads the live project state and returns a briefing a person with zero retained context can act on. It runs before the next move gets decided: catchup restores the map, so that decision starts from truth instead of a stale memory of it.

Workflow

  1. Read live state only: recent file mtimes, git log/diffs, plan and state docs, re0-memo notes, task boards. Never brief from conversation memory alone — memory is what drifted.
  2. Anchor on the human's last touch (their last message, judgment, or commit). Everything after that point is the delta; everything before it is assumed known and stays out.
  3. Compose in decision order, not chronological order:
    • Needs you — decisions, judgments, or inputs only the human can give, each self-contained enough to act on without opening another file.
    • Changed while you were away — outcomes, not process. "The plan's scoring rule was replaced" beats "I ran three analysis passes."
    • New words — every term coined or repurposed since their last touch, one line each, with where it lives. Skip terms they already used themselves.
  4. Gloss on first use: any project-specific term appearing in the briefing gets an inline plain-language aside at its first occurrence, even if a glossary section follows.
  5. Keep the default short (a screen or less). End with drill-down offers per section, not with everything expanded.

Rules

  • State-grounded: every claim traces to a file, commit, or artifact the human can open. No "as we discussed."
  • Read-only on the project. catchup briefs; it does not fix, rename, or decide.
  • The ask comes first. A briefing that buries the one question needing the human is a log.
  • Outcome voice, not journey voice. Narrating the agent's process is self-report, not briefing.
  • Silence the settled: closed decisions and healthy metrics get one line or none.
  • Honest completeness: "done" means verified done; "moved" is not "reconciled"; say which.
  • Do not re-explain terms the human demonstrably knows (they used them first).

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. Cold-read the briefing: no sentence requires pre-gap memory or an unglossed coined term to parse.
  2. The "needs you" items are each actionable without opening another file.
  3. Every claim has a checkable source (file, commit, artifact path).
  4. It fits on a screen, with expansion offered rather than delivered.

来源与署名

来源:LilMGenius/paperthin位于skills/coil/catchup提交7d5dc62

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架