Ssotize

LilMGenius/paperthin/skills/breadth/ssotize

作者 LilMGenius7d5dc6235990230e45a24a25c527d81701da5458无许可证收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日

Audit and consolidate a fact that's scattered across places into one canonical source, after approval, and replace the rest with references. Use when asked to find duplication, check consistency, locate the source of truth, deduplicate, consolidate, unify, or establish SSOT across artifacts or platforms. Starts read-only, reports the map and plan, then mutates only after explicit approval.

AI 生成的概览

审计分散在各处的事实副本,提出唯一权威来源,并在获批后用引用替换重复内容。

功能
该技能为特定事实、值、规范、决策、状态或定义建立单一事实来源。它先进行只读审计,枚举各工件和平台中的每一处出现,将其分类为完全副本、转述、部分、过时或矛盾,并提出权威来源及每处出现的处理动作。获得明确批准后,它会补全权威来源,用有效引用替换重复内容,并删除冗余副本,同时保留独有细节并将矛盾标记出来交由人工决定。
适用场景
当某个事实在文档、代码或平台之间重复或出现漂移,需要查找重复、检查一致性、定位事实来源、去重、合并或建立 SSOT 时使用。它适用于对混乱、遗留或新建状态的单次修复,而非持续维护。
运行要求
不包含脚本,仅为说明文档。需要访问被审计的工件和平台,并且代理必须能够在获批后编辑它们。文档提到使用 unicode 安全编辑以及语言感知工具进行结构性代码移动。

Find where one truth lives, get approval for the consolidation plan, then collapse it into one canonical home.

Goal

Enforce Single Source of Truth (SSOT): one fact = one home, and every other place that needs it references that home instead of copying it. References don't drift; copies do. This mutates artifacts, so it is deliberate and loss-averse.

ssotize starts as a read-only audit. It names the truth in scope, finds every copy, chooses the canonical home, and reports the exact consolidation plan. Only after the user approves that plan does it mutate artifacts.

Use this to establish or repair SSOT — messy, legacy, or freshly-scaffolded states. Once SSOT holds, don't overuse it: consolidation is a one-time repair, not ongoing upkeep. When a read-only checker and a mutating follow-up have become one inseparable workflow, fold the checker into the consolidator and keep the approval gate; splitting the reflex only makes the safer first half easier to skip.

Workflow

  1. Name the truth in scope — the specific fact, value, spec, decision, status, or definition being tracked, not the whole document.
  2. Audit read-only first: enumerate every occurrence across the given artifacts and platforms.
  3. Re-enumerate by a second method — a different search term, synonym, or tool — and confirm it surfaces no occurrence the first pass missed.
  4. Classify each occurrence: exact copy, paraphrase, partial, stale, or contradictory.
  5. Pick the canonical home — the most authoritative and most-maintained location, closest to where the fact actually changes. Never promote a weak copy just because it is convenient; extract a new canonical home if none exists.
  6. Decide the action per non-canonical occurrence: dedupe (redundant copy), reference (docs should link to canonical, code should import/source/include it, config should use a shared read), or reconcile (it disagrees and needs a human call).
  7. Report the audit before editing: a table of occurrences (location · kind · action), the proposed canonical home with a one-line justification, unique details that must be folded into it, contradictions that need a decision, and the exact mutation plan.
  8. Ask for explicit approval to execute the mutation plan. If approval is not given, stop after the read-only report.
  9. Make or extract the canonical home complete and current — fold in any unique detail that lived only in a copy. Never lose information to consolidation.
  10. Reconcile contradictions in the canonical home first; when the correct value is ambiguous, confirm it before replacing anything.
  11. Replace each duplicate with a live reference to the canonical home — for docs, use a link, a "see <home>", a quote-with-link, or a transclude where the platform supports it; for code, use an import/source/include of the shared home; for config, use a shared read from the one maintained file.
  12. Remove the now-redundant copies. Where removal would orphan a reader, leave a one-line pointer instead of deleting outright.

Rules

  • A pass that finds no scatter to consolidate changes nothing.
  • The audit phase is read-only. Do not edit, move, or delete before the user approves the mutation plan.
  • An empty findings list is a valid result — never invent drift to justify a consolidation.
  • Keep contradictions separate from plain duplicates; never silently decide which conflicting value is "true".
  • Flag any detail that lives only in a non-canonical copy — it must be folded into the canonical home before that copy can be cut.
  • Don't consolidate across a trust/permission boundary (private → public, customer-facing → internal) without explicit confirmation.
  • Mutate with edit-safety: assert each replace target exists before touching it (report a MISS, never a silent no-op), edit unicode-safe (PYTHONUTF8=1), and act per occurrence, never a blanket sweep; make structural code moves with language-aware tools or scripted AST/parser edits, never scripted text rewrites.
  • Be platform-aware: transclude where possible, else link to a stable anchor the reader can follow; prefer a reference over a hard deletion when a platform can't link back.
  • When the same project fact is split between a read-only audit artifact and a mutating artifact, and the audit has no independent durable use, treat that as SSOT scatter: propose folding the audit into the mutating artifact, then execute only after approval.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The audit was reported before mutation and approval was received, unless the run stayed read-only.
  2. The canonical home holds the complete, current truth on its own.
  3. Every former copy now references it, and each reference resolves.
  4. No unique detail was lost and nothing was orphaned.
  5. Contradictions were reconciled to one value, not left duplicated.
  6. Report what was consolidated, where the canonical home is, what was only audited, and what still needs a human decision.

来源与署名

来源:LilMGenius/paperthin位于skills/breadth/ssotize提交7d5dc62

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架