Landing Page Copywriter

作者 onewave-aifc5b7851a6c7无许可证325 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库6天前更新

Writes conversion-focused landing page copy - headlines, subheads, value propositions, feature and benefit blocks, social proof, FAQs, and CTA button text - using PAS, AIDA, or StoryBrand. Use when the user wants words for a landing page, sales page, product or pricing page, waitlist page, homepage hero, or ad-to-page flow, including rewriting weak copy, generating headline or CTA variants for A/B tests, or turning a product description into page sections. Use landing-page-optimizer instead for auditing an existing page's performance, and a frontend skill for building the page itself.

AI 生成的概览

撰写以转化为目标的落地页文案:标题、价值主张、功能模块、信任背书、FAQ 与 CTA。

功能
该技能以落地页文案为交付物,涵盖标题、副标题、价值主张、功能与利益模块、社会证明、FAQ 以及 CTA 按钮文字。它引导使用者先建立简报,再确定四行信息层级(承诺、机制、证明、行动),根据读者认知程度选择 PAS、AIDA 或 StoryBrand,并按固定顺序起草各版块。它还会生成用于测试的标题与 CTA 变体,并执行诸如不得编造证明、只保留一个主要行动、语气平实等检查。页面布局与代码明确不在范围内。
适用场景
当用户需要落地页、销售页、产品页或定价页、等候名单页、首页主视觉或广告到页面流程的文案时使用。它也适用于重写薄弱文案、为 A/B 测试生成标题或 CTA 变体,或把产品描述转化为页面版块。若要审计现有页面的表现,该技能会指向另一个工具。
运行要求
不含脚本,仅为说明性指令。它依赖两份随附参考文档,分别提供框架指引和输出模板。它需要用户或所附文档提供简报信息,例如产品、受众、问题、差异点和真实证明。

Landing Page Copywriter

Write landing page copy that makes one reader take one action. The copy is the deliverable; layout and code are out of scope unless asked.

Workflow

  1. Build the brief. Pull these from the conversation, attached docs, or the product's existing site before asking anything. Ask only for what is missing and blocking:

    • Product and the one action the page drives (buy, book, sign up, join waitlist)
    • Who lands here and where they came from (ad, search, email, referral) - this sets how much context the hero must carry
    • The problem in the reader's words, and what they use today instead
    • The real differentiator versus that alternative
    • Proof that actually exists: numbers, named customers, reviews, guarantees
  2. Write the message hierarchy before any sections. One sentence each:

    • Promise: the outcome the reader gets
    • Mechanism: why this product delivers it when alternatives do not
    • Proof: the strongest real evidence
    • Action: the CTA and what happens right after clicking

    If you cannot fill one of these, flag the gap instead of papering over it. Every section below expands one of these four lines.

  3. Pick the framework from the reader's awareness:

    • Reader feels the pain but has not looked for fixes: PAS
    • Reader is comparing options or cold from an ad: AIDA
    • Brand-led, story-heavy, or services business: StoryBrand

    Section-by-section guidance for each framework is in references/frameworks.md [blocked].

  4. Draft the page in the order hero, problem, solution/features, how it works, proof, pricing (if relevant), FAQ, final CTA. Cut sections the product does not need; a waitlist page may be hero + three benefits + CTA.

  5. Write variants where they matter: 3 headline options (different angles: outcome, pain, mechanism) and 2 CTA options. Say which you would test first and why.

  6. Run the checks below, fix what fails, then deliver using references/output-template.md [blocked].

Checks before delivering

  • No invented proof. Never make up testimonials, customer names, logos, user counts, or percentages. Use a labeled placeholder like [TESTIMONIAL: ops lead at a customer, quote about time saved] and list every placeholder at the end.
  • Headline test. Could a competitor paste your headline onto their page unchanged? If yes, it is too generic. Anchor it to the mechanism or a specific outcome.
  • Benefit test. Every feature line answers "so what?" for the reader. "Real-time sync" becomes "Your team sees the same numbers, no more version-hunting."
  • One primary action. Every CTA on the page points to the same action. Secondary links (docs, pricing) stay visually secondary in your notes.
  • CTA text starts with a verb and names the outcome ("Get my audit", "Start free trial"). Never "Submit" or "Click here". State friction reducers under it when true ("No card required").
  • Urgency only if real. Deadlines, limited seats, and price changes must be true. Fake scarcity costs trust; omit urgency instead.
  • Reading level. Short sentences, second person, present tense. Read the hero aloud; if it takes more than one breath, cut it.
  • Voice. Match the brand voice from any existing copy the user shared. If none, default to plain and direct over hype. Drop filler adjectives (revolutionary, seamless, cutting-edge, unlock, elevate).

Worked example

Brief: scheduling tool for independent physical therapy clinics; action is "book a demo"; readers come from a Google search for "PT clinic no-show software"; proof is one clinic that cut no-shows from 18% to 7%.

Message hierarchy:

  • Promise: fewer empty appointment slots
  • Mechanism: two-way text reminders that let patients reschedule in one tap instead of silently skipping
  • Proof: one clinic went from 18% to 7% no-shows in 60 days
  • Action: book a 20-minute demo

Hero (PAS, since searchers already feel the pain):

  • Headline: "Stop losing a fifth of your schedule to no-shows"
  • Subhead: "Patients reschedule by text in one tap, so the slot gets refilled instead of sitting empty."
  • CTA: "Book a 20-minute demo" / under it: "See it with your own calendar"
  • Proof line: "One clinic cut no-shows from 18% to 7% in 60 days" (real, from the brief)

Note what it avoids: no "revolutionary", no invented clinic count, and the headline only works for this product.

Common failure modes

  • Writing sections before the message hierarchy, which produces a page of disconnected claims.
  • Opening the hero with the product name or category ("Acme is an AI-powered platform...") instead of the reader's outcome.
  • An FAQ full of softballs. FAQ entries should answer the real objections: price, switching cost, setup time, security, "will this work for my case".
  • Treating every page as long-form. Match length to price and risk: a free signup needs less persuasion than a five-figure contract.

来源与署名

来源:onewave-ai/claude-skills位于landing-page-copywriter提交fc5b785

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架