Modular Decomposition

作者 tech-leads-club120b67676388无许可证收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional embedded DDD strategic analysis for bounded contexts. Use when asking how to split a monolith, size components before extraction, find duplicated domain logic, clean up module hierarchy, measure coupling between modules, or group components into services. Do NOT use for phased extraction roadmaps or prioritization without the prior analysis steps (use decomposition-planning-roadmap after this pipeline), end-to-end legacy migration strategy writeups (use legacy-migration-planner), pure infrastructure capacity sizing, or when you only need DDD without the structural pipeline (install domain-analysis standalone).

AI 生成的概览

运行五步结构分析流程,将单体应用拆解为候选的领域对齐模块。

功能
该技能引导智能体按顺序对代码库执行分析流程(模式 1-5):识别并评估组件规模、发现重复的通用领域逻辑、处理扁平化与层级问题、分析耦合关系,并将组件归组为候选的领域对齐单元。每个步骤由智能体加载并执行的 Markdown 参考文件定义,结果在步骤之间传递。它还提供可选的领域驱动设计战略分析以识别限界上下文,并产出与代码库证据相关的发现。
适用场景
当有人询问如何拆分单体应用、希望在抽取前评估组件规模、需要发现重复的领域逻辑、想要清理模块层级、希望测量模块之间的耦合,或想把组件归组为服务时使用。它不适用于在没有前置分析步骤的情况下制定抽取路线图或优先级、端到端遗留系统迁移策略,或纯粹的基础设施容量评估。
运行要求
无脚本;仅包含指令和 Markdown 参考文件。智能体需要访问目标代码库以检查文件、依赖和结构。未指定软件包、运行时、凭据或网络访问要求。

Modular Decomposition

This skill runs the Patterns 1–5 analysis pipeline before service extraction. Each pattern is plain markdown under references/; load the file for that step and execute it against the user’s codebase.

How to Use

Quick start (what users can say)

  • Full pipeline: “Run modular decomposition Patterns 1 through 5 on this repo,” “Analyze this monolith for splitting—inventory, coupling, and domain grouping.”
  • Single early step: “Identify and size components here,” “Find duplicated domain logic across modules,” “Analyze coupling between our packages.”
  • With DDD lens: “Group components into domains and check bounded contexts,” “Use DDD strategic design on this codebase before we group services.”

If the user only wants extraction order, phases, or migration roadmap after analysis exists, use decomposition-planning-roadmap instead. If they need a full legacy migration plan (strangler fig, research, multi-stack), use legacy-migration-planner as well or instead of this skill when that is the primary ask.

How the agent should run it

  1. Scope: Confirm the task is structural analysis (inventory → coupling → grouping), not roadmap authoring. If unclear, ask once whether they want the full ordered pipeline or a subset.
  2. Order: Run patterns 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 in that order. Do not skip a step unless the user explicitly limits scope; if they do, state which patterns were skipped and how that limits later conclusions.
  3. Load references: For each pattern, open the matching references/pattern-NN-*.md file and follow its instructions. Use the optional *-quick-reference.md for the same number when a short checklist is enough.
  4. Carry context forward: Reuse outputs from earlier patterns in later ones (e.g. component inventory from Pattern 1 informs coupling in 4 and grouping in 5). Reference concrete paths, modules, or tables from previous steps.
  5. Domain language (Pattern 5): If subdomains or bounded contexts need grounding beyond structure, read references/domain-analysis.md before or alongside Pattern 5. Optionally open references/domain-analysis-quick-reference.md or references/domain-analysis-examples.md for condensed rules or illustrations.
  6. Deliver: Produce clear, actionable findings per pattern or one consolidated report—always tied to evidence from the repository (files, dependencies, metrics), not generic advice.

Usage examples

Example 1 — Full pipeline

User: "We're going to split this monolith—run the full decomposition analysis (Patterns 1–5)."
Agent: Execute patterns 1→5 in order, loading each references/pattern-NN-*.md, preserving outputs between steps, then summarize cross-cutting recommendations.

Example 2 — Coupling after inventory

User: "We already have a rough module list—focus on coupling (Pattern 4) and then domain grouping (Pattern 5)."
Agent: If no prior inventory exists in the thread, either run Pattern 1 briefly or derive an explicit module list from the repo before 4 and 5. State any assumptions.

Example 3 — DDD before grouping

User: "Map bounded contexts and language, then group components into domains."
Agent: Read references/domain-analysis.md (and optional quick reference/examples) in parallel with or immediately before Pattern 5; align Pattern 5 groupings with linguistic boundaries where evidence supports it.

Prerequisites

  • Complete Pattern N before starting Pattern N+1 unless the user explicitly narrows scope. Later patterns depend on earlier results (for example, inventory and structure inform coupling and grouping).
  • If business vocabulary, subdomains, or bounded contexts are uncertain, use references/domain-analysis.md before or alongside Pattern 5 (see Bounded contexts below).

Ordered workflow (Patterns 1–5)

StepPatternPrimary reference
1Identify and size componentsreferences/pattern-01-identify-and-size.md (optional: pattern-01-identify-and-size-quick-reference.md)
2Common domain detectionreferences/pattern-02-common-domain.md (optional: pattern-02-common-domain-quick-reference.md)
3Flattening / hierarchyreferences/pattern-03-flattening.md (optional: pattern-03-flattening-quick-reference.md)
4Coupling analysisreferences/pattern-04-coupling.md
5Domain identification and groupingreferences/pattern-05-domain-grouping.md (optional: pattern-05-domain-grouping-quick-reference.md)

Pattern 6 — planning and extraction

Pattern 6 (create domain services / extraction) is not duplicated here. After Pattern 5, switch to decomposition-planning-roadmap for phased extraction order, milestones, and migration-style planning. For full legacy migration strategy (strangler-fig, cross-stack rewrites, research-heavy plans), optionally use legacy-migration-planner in addition.

Bounded contexts and DDD strategic design

  • Patterns 1–4 focus on structural inventory, duplication, hierarchy, and coupling between parts of the codebase.
  • Pattern 5 produces candidate groupings aligned with solution-space boundaries (which components belong together as services).
  • Strategic DDD (subdomains, bounded contexts, ubiquitous language) is covered in references/domain-analysis.md, with optional domain-analysis-quick-reference.md and domain-analysis-examples.md. Use it when you need to validate or refine boundaries against business language, not only folder structure.

来源与署名

来源:tech-leads-club/agent-skills位于packages/skills-catalog/skills/(architecture)/modular-decomposition提交120b676

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架