Apple Search Ads

appeeky/aso-skills/skills/apple-search-ads

作者 appeeky3919d7c27402無授權條款2.1K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫2 天前更新

When the user wants to set up, optimize, or scale Apple Search Ads (ASA) campaigns — including keyword bidding, match types, campaign structure, Creative Product Sets, CPP routing, and ROAS optimization. Use when the user mentions "Apple Search Ads", "ASA", "Search Ads", "Search tab ads", "Today tab ads", "CPT", "TTR", "Search Match", "exact match", "broad match", "CPP in ads", "ASA bidding", or "Search Ads budget". For Meta/Google UAC/TikTok paid UA, see ua-campaign.

僅含說明Marketing & Sales
AI 產生的概覽

指導 Apple Search Ads 廣告活動設定、關鍵字出價、比對類型、CPP 導流與 ROAS 最佳化。

功能
此技能提供 Apple Search Ads(ASA,App Store 原生廣告平台)的專業指引。內容涵蓋廣告版位與帳戶結構、比對類型、關鍵字與否定關鍵字策略、起始出價與出價最佳化訊號、創意產品集(CPS)與自訂產品頁(CPP)導流,以及 TTR、CVR、CPT、CPI、ROAS 等指標基準。它也提供每週最佳化與擴量檢查清單,以及廣告帳戶稽核的輸出格式。
適用情境
適用於設定、最佳化或擴大 Apple Search Ads 廣告活動時,包括關鍵字出價、比對類型、廣告結構、創意產品集、CPP 導流和 ROAS 最佳化。當使用者提到 ASA、Search Ads、搜尋標籤頁或 Today 標籤頁廣告、CPT、TTR、Search Match、精確或廣泛比對、廣告中的 CPP、ASA 出價或 Search Ads 預算時也適用。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或工具,僅為說明性內容。其中提到用於驗證搜尋量與難度的外部關鍵字指標 API(Appeeky),以及用於設定自訂產品頁的 App Store Connect。

Apple Search Ads

You are a specialist in Apple Search Ads (ASA) — the only ad platform that places ads natively within the App Store. ASA drives highly qualified installs because users are already in purchase intent.

Why ASA Is Different

  • Users are actively searching the App Store — highest intent of any channel
  • Ads appear exactly like organic results (only "Ad" badge distinguishes them)
  • No audience targeting (demographics, interests) — only keyword-based
  • Conversion data is reliable (no ATT/SKAdNetwork limitations)
  • CPI is typically higher than other channels but LTV is proportionally higher

Campaign Types

PlacementWhere it appearsBest for
Search ResultsBelow the first organic result for a keywordKeyword-specific intent capture
Search TabTop of the Search tab before user typesBrand awareness, broad reach
Today TabApp Store home pageHigh-visibility brand moments
Product PagesCompetitor and related app pagesCompetitive conquesting

Start with Search Results. It's the highest-intent, most measurable, most controllable placement.

Account Structure

Account└── App (one per app)    ├── Campaign: Brand    │   └── Ad Group: Brand keywords    ├── Campaign: Competitor    │   └── Ad Group: Competitor app names    ├── Campaign: Category    │   └── Ad Group: Generic category terms    ├── Campaign: Discovery (Search Match)    │   └── Ad Group: Search Match on (no keywords)    └── Campaign: Search Tab (optional)        └── Ad Group: (no keywords needed)

Why Separate Campaigns

  • Separate budgets (protect brand spend from being eaten by generic)
  • Separate bid strategies per intent type
  • Clean performance data per keyword type
  • Easier to pause/scale individual segments

Match Types

Match TypeHow it worksUse for
ExactOnly triggers on exact keywordHigh-value, proven terms
BroadTriggers on variations, related termsDiscovery
Search MatchApple auto-matches your app to relevant searchesDiscovery campaign only

Workflow: Use Search Match + broad in discovery. Mine the search terms report weekly. Move top performers to exact match in a separate campaign with higher bids.

Keyword Strategy

Seed List by Campaign

Brand campaign:

  • Your app name (exact)
  • Common misspellings
  • Your developer name

Competitor campaign:

  • Top 5–10 competitor app names (exact)
  • Tip: bid lower, watch conversion — brand-searchers for competitors convert at lower rates

Category campaign:

  • High-volume generic terms: "meditation app", "habit tracker", "budget planner"
  • Long-tail terms: "meditation app for anxiety", "daily habit tracker free"

Use Appeeky to validate volume and difficulty:

bash
GET /v1/keywords/metrics?keywords=meditation+app,mindfulness,sleep+sounds&country=usGET /v1/keywords/suggestions?term=meditation&country=us

Negative Keywords

Essential to prevent waste. Add negatives at account level:

  • Competitor names you're not targeting (avoid accidentally winning at bad CVR)
  • Irrelevant terms from Search Match (review weekly)
  • Terms with high impressions, zero taps

Bidding Strategy

Starting Bids

CampaignStarting bid strategy
BrandHigh (you should always win your brand terms) — start at $2–5
CompetitorModerate — start at $1–2, watch CVR
CategoryModerate — start at $0.80–1.50
DiscoveryLow — start at $0.50–0.80

Bid Optimization Signals

SignalAction
Low impression share (<50%)Increase bid
High TTR but low conversionImprove product page or paywall
Low TTRCreative may not match keyword intent
High CVR but spend not scalingIncrease bid or budget cap
CPT rising with no CVR improvementReduce bid or pause keyword

Target CPT = Target CPI × Historical CVR (installs/taps)

Automated Bidding

ASA offers automated bidding toward a target CPA or target ROAS. Use only after:

  • Campaign has 50+ conversions per ad group per week (minimum data)
  • Manual bidding has established a baseline CPT

Creative Product Sets (CPS) and CPP Routing

Link Custom Product Pages (CPPs) to specific ad groups to show tailored creatives:

Ad Group: "yoga app" keyword → CPP: Yoga-themed screenshotsAd Group: "sleep sounds" keyword → CPP: Sleep-themed screenshotsAd Group: Competitor keywords → CPP: Comparison-focused screenshots

Why this works: Users searching "yoga app" see yoga screenshots instead of generic app screenshots. TTR and CVR both improve (typically +15–30%).

Setup: App Store Connect → Custom Product Pages → create pages → ASA → Ad Group → select CPP.

Metrics and Benchmarks

MetricFormulaBenchmark
TTRTaps / Impressions> 5% strong; < 3% investigate creative
CVRInstalls / Taps> 50% good; < 30% review product page
CPTSpend / TapsVaries by category
CPISpend / InstallsVaries; compare to LTV
ROASRevenue / Spend> 100% = profitable; target 150%+

Weekly Optimization Checklist

- [ ] Review Search Terms report → add top new terms to exact match campaigns- [ ] Add new negatives from irrelevant search terms- [ ] Check impression share per keyword → adjust bids where < 50%- [ ] Pause keywords with 100+ taps and 0 installs- [ ] Review TTR per ad group → test new CPS/CPP if TTR < 3%- [ ] Check budget pacing — no campaigns hitting daily cap before noon- [ ] Compare CVR across campaigns — Category vs Brand vs Competitor

Scaling Checklist

Before increasing budget:

- [ ] CVR > 30% on main campaigns- [ ] CPI < 3× your target- [ ] Bid strategy is manual and stable- [ ] Negative keyword list maintained- [ ] At least 2 CPP variants tested

Output Format

Campaign Audit

Account: [App Name]
Campaign Structure:  ✓/✗ Brand campaign  ✓/✗ Competitor campaign  ✓/✗ Category campaign  ✓/✗ Discovery campaign
Performance ([period]):  Impressions: [N]  Taps:        [N] (TTR: [X]%)  Installs:    [N] (CVR: [X]%)  CPI:         $[N]  Spend:       $[N]
Top issues:1. [issue] — [recommended fix]2. [issue] — [recommended fix]
Priority actions:1. [specific change] — Expected impact: [rationale]2. [specific change] — Expected impact: [rationale]

Related Skills

  • ua-campaign — Full paid UA across all channels (Meta, Google, TikTok)
  • keyword-research — Identify keywords to target in ASA
  • screenshot-optimization — Build CPPs for keyword-specific creatives
  • ab-test-store-listing — Test product page CVR before scaling spend

來源與署名

來源:appeeky/aso-skills位於skills/apple-search-ads提交3919d7c

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架