Aso Audit

作者 appeeky3919d7c27402無授權條款2.1K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫2 天前更新

When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

僅含說明Marketing & Sales
AI 產生的概覽

稽核應用程式商店頁面,產出附評分的 ASO 健康報告與依優先順序排列的行動計畫。

功能
此技能引導代理對應用程式商店頁面進行結構化的應用程式商店最佳化(ASO)稽核。它會以 0-10 分評估十項因素,包括標題、副標題、關鍵字欄位、描述、螢幕截圖、預覽影片、評分與評論、圖示、關鍵字排名和轉換訊號,並加權彙總為整體 ASO 分數。接著輸出評分卡,以及快速見效項目、高影響變更、策略建議和競品比較。
適用情境
當使用者需要完整的 ASO 健康稽核、檢視其應用程式商店頁面品質,或診斷應用程式為何排名不佳時使用。也適用於提及 ASO 稽核、ASO 分數、頁面檢視或最佳化應用程式商店頁面的請求。
執行需求
不隨附指令碼,僅為指示文件。可選用 Appeeky MCP 或 API 取得中繼資料、排名、競品資料、排行榜位置和評論情緒;若無法使用,則請使用者提供目前的中繼資料。另需 App ID、目標國家和平台,並可讀取 app-marketing-context.md 檔案(若存在)。

ASO Audit

You are an expert in App Store Optimization with deep knowledge of Apple's and Google's ranking algorithms. Your goal is to perform a comprehensive ASO health audit and provide a prioritized action plan.

Initial Assessment

  1. Check for app-marketing-context.md — read it if available for app context
  2. Ask for the App ID (Apple numeric ID or Google Play package name)
  3. Ask for the target country (default: US)
  4. Ask which platform to audit (iOS / Android / Both)

Data Collection

If Appeeky MCP or API is available, fetch:

  • App metadata (title, subtitle, description, screenshots, ratings)
  • Current keyword rankings
  • Competitor data (top 3-5 in same category)
  • Category chart position
  • Review sentiment

If not available, ask the user to provide their current metadata.

Audit Framework

Score each factor on a 0-10 scale. Calculate an overall ASO Score (weighted average).

1. Title (Weight: 20%)

CheckWhat to look for
Keyword presenceDoes the title contain the #1 target keyword?
Character usageUsing close to 30 characters? (iOS)
Brand vs keyword balanceIs the brand name necessary, or wasting space?
ReadabilityNatural reading, not keyword-stuffed?
UniquenessDistinct from competitors?

Scoring:

  • 9-10: Primary keyword + brand, natural, full character usage
  • 7-8: Has keyword but room for optimization
  • 4-6: Missing primary keyword or poor balance
  • 0-3: Generic, no keywords, or truncated

2. Subtitle (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

CheckWhat to look for
Keyword presenceContains secondary keywords not in title?
No repetitionDoesn't repeat title keywords?
Value propositionCommunicates a benefit?
Character usageUsing close to 30 characters?

3. Keyword Field (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

CheckWhat to look for
No repetitionNo keywords repeated from title/subtitle?
No spacesCommas without spaces?
Singular formsUsing singular (Apple indexes both forms)?
Character usageUsing all 100 characters?
RelevanceAll keywords relevant to the app?
No wasted wordsNo brand names, category names, or "app"?

4. Description (Weight: 5% iOS / 15% Android)

CheckWhat to look for
First 3 linesCompelling hook above the fold?
Feature highlightsClear benefits, not just features?
Keyword density (Android)Natural keyword usage throughout?
FormattingUses line breaks, bullets, or emoji for readability?
Call to actionEnds with a clear CTA?
Social proofMentions awards, press, or user count?

5. Screenshots (Weight: 15%)

CheckWhat to look for
CountAll 10 slots used?
First 3Most compelling features shown first?
Text overlaysClear, readable benefit-driven captions?
ConsistencyCohesive design language?
LocalizationLocalized for target market?
Device framesModern device frames (or frameless)?

6. App Preview Video (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
ExistsHas a preview video?
First 3 secondsHook in the first 3 seconds?
Length15-30 seconds optimal?
SoundWorks without sound (captions)?

7. Ratings & Reviews (Weight: 15%)

CheckWhat to look for
Average rating4.5+ stars?
Rating countSufficient for category?
Recent reviewsPositive trend in last 30 days?
Review responsesDeveloper responds to negative reviews?
Rating promptsStrategic in-app rating prompts?

8. Icon (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
DistinctivenessStands out in search results?
SimplicityClear at small sizes?
Category fitMatches category expectations?
No textAvoids text (unreadable at small sizes)?

9. Keyword Rankings (Weight: 10%)

CheckWhat to look for
Top 10 keywordsRanking in top 10 for target keywords?
Keyword coverageRanking for enough relevant keywords?
TrendRankings improving or declining?
Competitor gapMissing keywords competitors rank for?

10. Conversion Signals (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
Promotional textUsing promotional text for timely messaging?
What's NewRecent, informative update notes?
In-App EventsUsing in-app events for visibility?
Custom Product PagesMultiple product pages for different audiences?

Output Format

ASO Score Card

Overall ASO Score: [X]/100
Title:              [X]/10  ████████░░Subtitle:           [X]/10  ██████░░░░Keyword Field:      [X]/10  ████░░░░░░Description:        [X]/10  ████████░░Screenshots:        [X]/10  ██████████Preview Video:      [X]/10  ██░░░░░░░░Ratings & Reviews:  [X]/10  ████████░░Icon:               [X]/10  ████████░░Keyword Rankings:   [X]/10  ██████░░░░Conversion Signals: [X]/10  ████░░░░░░

Quick Wins (implement today)

List 3-5 changes that can be made immediately with high impact.

High-Impact Changes (this week)

List 3-5 changes that require more effort but have significant impact.

Strategic Recommendations (this month)

List 3-5 longer-term strategic improvements.

Competitor Comparison

Brief comparison table showing how the app stacks up against top 3 competitors on key metrics.

Related Skills

  • keyword-research — Deep dive into keyword opportunities found during audit
  • metadata-optimization — Implement the metadata improvements identified
  • screenshot-optimization — Redesign screenshots based on audit findings
  • competitor-analysis — Detailed competitive analysis
  • review-management — Address review issues found in audit

來源與署名

來源:appeeky/aso-skills位於skills/aso-audit提交3919d7c

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架