Startup Analysis
Produces a multi-perspective analysis of a startup, examining it through three lenses that each reveal different aspects of company health and potential:
- VC Investor Lens — Is this a good investment? Market size, unit economics, growth trajectory, team quality, defensibility
- Job Applicant Lens — Should I work here? Equity value, runway risk, culture signals, career growth, compensation fairness
- CEO/Founder Lens — How healthy is this company? Product-market fit, burn efficiency, competitive moat, organizational health
Each perspective surfaces insights the others miss. A company can be a great investment but a terrible place to work (or vice versa). The goal is to give the user a 360-degree view so they can make informed decisions.
Step 1: Gather Information
Before analyzing, collect as much public information as possible about the startup. Use web search, the company's website, Crunchbase data, press coverage, and any other available sources.
Key data to gather:
If certain data isn't publicly available (e.g., revenue for private companies), note the gap and infer what you can from indirect signals (hiring pace, customer logos, web traffic proxies, job postings).
When information is insufficient
Many startups — especially early-stage or niche ones — have limited public presence. If web search does not return enough information to produce a meaningful analysis (e.g., you can't determine what the company does, who founded it, or how it's funded), ask the user to provide the company's website URL before proceeding. The company website is often the single most information-dense source, and reading it directly (about page, pricing page, team page, blog) can fill most gaps.
You can also ask the user for:
- The company's website or landing page URL
- A Crunchbase, LinkedIn, or PitchBook link
- Any pitch deck, job listing, or press article they have
- Specific context they already know (e.g., "they just raised a Series A from Sequoia")
It is better to ask for a URL and produce an accurate analysis than to guess and produce a misleading one.
Step 2: Determine Which Perspectives to Cover
By default, produce all three perspectives. If the user specifies a particular angle (e.g., "I'm considering joining them" or "should I invest"), emphasize that perspective but still include the others as context — they often reveal relevant information.
Step 3: Analyze from Each Perspective
Read the relevant reference files for the detailed framework for each perspective. These contain the specific criteria, metrics, and red/green flags to evaluate.
VC Investor Analysis
Read references/vc-framework.md for the full evaluation framework.
Core areas to assess:
- Market opportunity — TAM/SAM/SOM, market timing, secular trends
- Product & traction — Product-market fit signals, growth metrics, retention
- Unit economics — CAC, LTV, margins, burn multiple, path to profitability
- Team — Founder-market fit, technical depth, hiring ability
- Defensibility — Moats (network effects, switching costs, data, brand, regulatory)
- Deal terms context — Stage-appropriate valuation, comparable exits
Produce a clear Investment Thesis (bull case) and Key Risks (bear case). End with a verdict: Strong Pass / Lean Pass / Lean Invest / Strong Invest, with reasoning.
Job Applicant Analysis
Read references/job-applicant-framework.md for the full evaluation framework.
Core areas to assess:
- Financial stability — Runway, burn rate, funding trajectory, revenue health
- Equity value — Option/equity package analysis, dilution risk, liquidation preferences, realistic exit scenarios
- Career growth — Role scope, learning opportunity, resume value, mentorship
- Culture & work-life — Glassdoor signals, employee tenure data, leadership style
- Product & market risk — Is PMF real? What happens if the startup fails?
- Red flags — High turnover, constant pivots, vague metrics, founders cashing out
Produce a clear Why Join (pros) and Watch Out For (risks). End with a verdict: Strong Pass / Lean Pass / Lean Join / Strong Join, with reasoning.
CEO/Founder Analysis
Read references/ceo-framework.md for the full evaluation framework.
Core areas to assess:
- Product-market fit — Retention curves, organic growth, Sean Ellis test proxy
- Growth efficiency — Burn multiple, CAC payback, magic number
- Competitive position — Moat strength, competitive dynamics, market share trajectory
- Organizational health — Hiring pipeline, attrition, team capability gaps
- Fundraising readiness — Metrics vs. benchmarks for next round, investor narrative
- Strategic risks — Platform dependency, customer concentration, regulatory exposure
Produce a clear Strengths to Double Down On and Urgent Areas to Address. End with a health grade: Critical / Struggling / Stable / Strong / Exceptional, with reasoning.
Step 4: Synthesize Cross-Perspective Insights
After the three analyses, add a synthesis section that highlights:
- Where perspectives agree — If all three lenses flag the same strength or weakness, it's probably real
- Where perspectives diverge — A company can be VC-attractive (huge market) but employee-risky (high burn, low runway). Call these out.
- The bottom line — One paragraph summary: what kind of company is this, what's its most likely trajectory, and what should the user do based on their stated (or implied) situation
Step 5: Present the Report
Write it as a scannable report titled [Company Name] — Startup Analysis:
- Summary — a short overview that states the three verdicts up front.
- One section per perspective, in the order that fits the user's situation from Step 2. Each covers the core areas from Step 3 with the evidence behind every judgment, and ends with its verdict on the scale defined there — Investment Verdict (Strong Pass / Lean Pass / Lean Invest / Strong Invest), Employment Verdict (Strong Pass / Lean Pass / Lean Join / Strong Join), or Health Grade (Critical / Struggling / Stable / Strong / Exceptional) — followed by the reasoning.
- Cross-perspective synthesis — where the lenses agree, where they diverge, and the bottom line.
Scale each section to the evidence: where financials or other areas are opaque, say so in a line and spend the space on what's observable, rather than filling a heading for its own sake. Don't fabricate metrics; make informed inferences and state your confidence level.
Reference Files
references/vc-framework.md— VC due diligence checklist with metrics, benchmarks, and red/green flagsreferences/job-applicant-framework.md— Job seeker evaluation framework with equity analysis and culture assessmentreferences/ceo-framework.md— CEO self-assessment framework with operational metrics and strategic analysis
Read these when you need the detailed criteria and benchmarks for each perspective.
