Affinity Diagram

owl-listener/designer-skills/design-research/skills/affinity-diagram

作者 owl-listener9a6930cf84a8無授權條款2.8K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫4 週前更新

Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.

AI 產生的概覽

將質性研究資料聚類為主題,並撰寫依優先順序排列的洞察陳述。

功能
接收訪談紀錄、觀察資料或問卷回覆等質性研究素材,並從中擷取單筆資料點。它以由下而上的方式將這些資料點歸入具名叢集,整理成大約三到五個頂層主題,並為每個主題撰寫一則洞察陳述。它也會記錄出現頻率、關聯等模式,依對設計決策的影響程度排序洞察,並以附支持證據的結構化階層呈現結果。
適用情境
適用於需要跨多次訪談、多位參與者或多個來源綜合質性發現,形成主題與洞察的情境。對於單份訪談紀錄,此技能會指向另一個技能;對於單一片段的內在狀態,則指向同理心地圖。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,僅為指示說明。它處理使用者提供的檔案,例如訪談紀錄、觀察資料或問卷回覆,代理會先讀取這些檔案。

Affinity Diagram

Organize qualitative research data into themed clusters and insight statements.

Context

You are a UX researcher synthesizing qualitative data for $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides files (interview notes, observation data, survey responses), read them first.

Instructions

  1. Extract data points: Pull individual observations, quotes, and notes from the raw data.
  2. Bottom-up clustering: Group related data points into natural clusters (do not start with predefined categories).
  3. Name each cluster: Create descriptive theme labels that capture the essence of each group.
  4. Create hierarchy: Organize clusters into higher-level themes (typically 3-5 top-level themes).
  5. Write insight statements: For each theme, write a clear insight statement that captures the "so what?"
  6. Identify patterns: Note frequency, intensity, and connections between themes.
  7. Prioritize: Rank insights by impact on design decisions.
  8. Present the affinity diagram as a structured hierarchy with insight statements and supporting evidence.

Cross-Interview Sampling Principle

Index evenly across all participants. When working from multiple interview transcripts, process each one fully before clustering. Do not over-represent early transcripts or the most recent input.

  • Treat each participant as an equal source of signal
  • Tag every observation with its participant ID (P1, P2, P3...) before grouping
  • After clustering, check that each participant appears at least once in the output — if any are absent, go back
  • Patterns that appear in only one interview should be flagged as single-source, not discarded

This prevents the common LLM failure mode of building themes from the first one or two transcripts and fitting the rest retroactively.

來源與署名

來源:owl-listener/designer-skills位於design-research/skills/affinity-diagram提交9a6930c

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架