Retro

作者 phuryn8607e3b07781無授權條款26K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 週前更新

Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized action items with owners and deadlines. Use when running a retrospective, reflecting on a sprint, creating action items from team feedback, or learning how to run effective retros.

AI 產生的概覽

引導結構化的衝刺回顧,並產出包含優先順序行動項目、負責人與截止日期的總結。

功能
依照選定形式(例如 Start/Stop/Continue、4Ls 或 Sailboat)引導回顧流程。它會將原始團隊回饋歸類為主題,對照衝刺目標與承諾分析衝刺表現,並產生兩到三個帶有負責人、截止日期與成功指標的優先順序行動項目。最終輸出 markdown 格式的回顧總結,包含關鍵主題與上次回顧行動項目的追蹤狀態。
適用情境
適用於進行衝刺回顧、檢討已完成的衝刺,或將團隊回饋轉化為具體行動項目。也適合希望採用可重複使用的回顧結構並追蹤先前行動的團隊。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,僅以指示形式運作。若使用者提供衝刺資料、速率圖、團隊回饋或先前的回顧紀錄,效果更佳。

Sprint Retrospective Facilitator

Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.

Context

You are facilitating a retrospective for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (sprint data, velocity charts, team feedback, or previous retro notes), read them first.

Instructions

  1. Choose a retro format based on context (or let the user pick):

    Format A — Start / Stop / Continue:

    • Start: What should we begin doing?
    • Stop: What should we stop doing?
    • Continue: What's working well that we should keep?

    Format B — 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For):

    • Liked: What did the team enjoy?
    • Learned: What new knowledge was gained?
    • Lacked: What was missing?
    • Longed For: What do we wish we had?

    Format C — Sailboat:

    • Wind (propels us): What's driving us forward?
    • Anchor (holds us back): What's slowing us down?
    • Rocks (risks): What dangers lie ahead?
    • Island (goal): Where are we trying to get to?
  2. If the user provides raw feedback (e.g., sticky notes, survey responses, Slack messages):

    • Group similar items into themes
    • Identify the most frequently mentioned topics
    • Note sentiment patterns (frustration, energy, confusion)
  3. Analyze the sprint performance:

    • Sprint goal: achieved or not?
    • Velocity vs. commitment (over-committed? under-committed?)
    • Blockers encountered and how they were resolved
    • Collaboration patterns (what worked, what didn't)
  4. Generate prioritized action items:

    PriorityAction ItemOwnerDeadlineSuccess Metric
    1[Specific, actionable improvement][Name/Role][Date][How we'll know it worked]
    • Limit to 2-3 action items (more won't get done)
    • Each must be specific, assignable, and measurable
    • Reference previous retro actions if available — were they completed?
  5. Create the retro summary:

    ## Sprint [X] Retrospective — [Date]
    ### Sprint Performance- Goal: [Achieved / Partially / Missed]- Committed: [X pts] | Completed: [Y pts]
    ### Key Themes1. [Theme] — [summary]
    ### Action Items1. [Action] — [Owner] — [By date]
    ### Carry-over from Last Retro- [Previous action] — [Status: Done / In Progress / Not Started]

Save as markdown. Keep the tone constructive — the goal is improvement, not blame.

來源與署名

來源:phuryn/pm-skills位於pm-execution/skills/retro提交8607e3b

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架