Value Proposition

作者 phuryn8607e3b07781無授權條款26K 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫3 週前更新

Design a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template — Who, Why, What before, How, What after, Alternatives. Use when creating a value proposition, analyzing customer value delivery, or articulating why customers should choose your product.

AI 產生的概覽

引導產品策略人員以六部分 JTBD 範本建立價值主張與定位陳述。

功能
此技能提供一套六部分範本——Who、Why、What Before、How、What After、Alternatives——用來闡述產品為客戶帶來的價值。它依序引導梳理目標客群、界定核心問題與待完成的工作、描述現況、說明解決方案、設想改善後的結果,並比較替代方案。最終產出精簡的價值主張陳述,以及可供行銷使用的定位陳述,並附上 Canva 範例,以及何時改用 Strategyzer 價值主張畫布的說明。
適用情境
在建立價值主張、分析客戶價值交付,或闡明客戶為何應選擇某項產品時使用。它適合需要針對特定客群、供行銷、業務或新手導引使用的產品策略與定位工作。
執行需求
不需要指令碼或特殊工具,僅為指示型技能。需要使用者提供產品資訊、目標客群、競爭替代方案與市場洞察等輸入。

Value Proposition

Metadata

  • Name: value-proposition
  • Description: Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part template with JTBD framing. Includes practical examples for designing compelling customer value.
  • Triggers: value proposition, value prop, customer value, JTBD value, value map

Instructions

You are a product strategist designing a clear value proposition for $ARGUMENTS.

Your task is to develop a comprehensive value proposition that articulates the customer value delivered by the product.

Input Requirements

  • Product description and features
  • Target customer segment and their problems
  • Competitive alternatives and current solutions
  • Customer insights or market data

Value Proposition Template

6-Part Structure

1. Who

  • Who is this value proposition for?
  • What customer segment are we addressing?
  • What are their characteristics and constraints?

2. Why (Problem)

  • What is the customer's core problem or need?
  • What's the Job to Be Done (JTBD)?
  • What desired outcomes are they trying to achieve?

3. What Before

  • What is the customer's current situation?
  • What are they using today to solve this problem?
  • What friction or pain exists in the current approach?

4. How (Solution)

  • How does the product solve the problem?
  • What specific features or capabilities deliver value?
  • Why is this solution better than alternatives?

5. What After

  • What is the improved outcome or future state?
  • How does the customer's life/work change?
  • What becomes possible that wasn't before?

6. Alternatives

  • What other solutions could customers use?
  • Why would they choose us instead?
  • What's the switching cost or friction from alternatives?

Example: Canva

  • Who: Non-designers who need to create marketing graphics
  • Why: They need professional-looking designs but can't hire designers or use complex tools
  • What Before: Using PowerPoint, Photoshop (too complex), or hiring expensive designers
  • How: Drag-and-drop templates, built-in design elements, AI design assistance, intuitive interface
  • What After: Create professional designs in minutes, launch campaigns faster, save design costs
  • Alternatives: Photoshop (complex), Fiverr (slow, expensive), Canva competitors (fewer templates, harder UX)

Output Process

  1. Identify and profile the target customer segment
  2. Define the core problem and JTBD
  3. Describe the current state and friction points
  4. Articulate how the product solves the problem
  5. Envision the improved outcome
  6. Compare against competitive alternatives
  7. Create a concise value prop statement (1-2 sentences)
  8. Develop a positioning statement for marketing use

Domain Context

This template vs Strategyzer's Value Proposition Canvas: Strategyzer's canvas (by Alexander Osterwalder) is widely used but has structural limitations. This 6-part JTBD template (by Paweł Huryn and Aatir Abdul Rauf) addresses them:

  • Customer first: This template starts with the customer (Who/Why) and works toward the solution. Strategyzer's canvas places the product on the left, which often leads teams to start with their solution rather than the customer's problem.
  • One segment at a time: This template is designed for one segment per pass. Strategyzer's canvas encourages mapping multiple products/services simultaneously, which dilutes focus.
  • Explicit alternatives: Section 6 (Alternatives) forces you to name what customers would use without you and articulate why you're better. Strategyzer's canvas has no equivalent — you don't directly confront substitutes.
  • Simpler structure: "What before → How → What after" is easier to fill out than separating Customer Jobs, Pains, and Gains on one side and Pain Relievers, Gain Creators, and Products on the other. The separation often creates confusion about where things go.
  • Actionable output: The final Value Proposition Statement is ready for marketing, sales, and onboarding. Strategyzer's canvas doesn't produce a reusable statement.

Use Strategyzer's Value Proposition Canvas when you need a detailed pains/gains decomposition for a mature product with complex customer needs. Use this 6-part template for clarity, speed, and actionable output.

Notes

  • Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framework focuses on the progress the customer is trying to make, not demographics
  • Value propositions are segment-specific; you may have different value props for different customer groups
  • The stronger your value prop, the easier marketing, sales, and product decisions become
  • Test value props with real customers before finalizing
  • Use a Value Curve (Blue Ocean Strategy) to visually compare your offering against competitors across key factors

Templates


Further Reading

來源與署名

來源:phuryn/pm-skills位於pm-product-strategy/skills/value-proposition提交8607e3b

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架