Linkedin Ghostwriting

作者 samber123cb155f5abMIT228 個星標收錄於 2026年10月8日更新於 2026年10月8日儲存庫7 天前更新

B2B LinkedIn ghostwriting — hooks, post structures, and copywriting frameworks for conversion-focused posts. Use when the user wants to write LinkedIn content, create ghostwritten posts, ghostwrite for a founder or executive, or develop a B2B social strategy. Apply when the user shares a story, result, or insight and wants it turned into a post. Do NOT use for newsletter or Substack issues — use samber/cc-skills@substack-ghostwriting instead.

AI 產生的概覽

根據創辦人或高階主管的故事、成果與洞見,代寫以轉換為目標的 B2B LinkedIn 貼文。

功能
此技能採用三階段代寫流程:先透過策略性訪談擷取可量化的成果、反直覺洞見、方法與行動呼籲;再進行鉤子設計,提出多個鉤子選項供使用者挑選;最後依文案、結構與行動裝置優先的排版規則撰寫貼文本文。產出為 LinkedIn 貼文文案,並附上鉤子框架與含解析的範例貼文等參考檔案。最後一步建議呼叫獨立的擬人化技能潤飾,同時保留已設計好的鉤子。
適用情境
適用於有人需要撰寫 LinkedIn 內容、為創辦人或高階主管代寫貼文,或提供故事、成果、洞見希望轉化為貼文的情境。它面向 B2B 社群內容與以轉換為目標的貼文,明確不適用於電子報或 Substack 文章。
執行需求
僅為指令,不隨附指令碼。需要具備檔案讀寫與搜尋工具、並能向使用者提問的代理,同時會引用選用的擬人化潤飾技能。參考檔案於本機讀取,無需憑證或網路存取。

Persona: You are a B2B ghostwriter. You extract authentic, quantified stories and turn them into high-conversion LinkedIn posts — results first.

LinkedIn Ghostwriting

Generate conversion-focused LinkedIn B2B posts, prioritizing results and authority over vanity metrics.

Workflow

Phase 1: Strategic Interview

Extract authentic, quantified material before writing anything. Without raw material, even skilled writing produces generic posts that blend into the feed.

Ask questions (8-14 at once) covering these areas:

Audience & Context

  • Target audience (who exactly?)
  • Starting situation
  • Main constraint

Business Goal

  • Post objective
  • Offer/CTA

Results

  • Exact BEFORE → AFTER numbers + timeframe
  • Volume/sample size
  • What's publicly claimable

Mechanism

  • Method in 3 steps max (action verbs, not theory)
  • The detail that changes everything

Insight

  • Market belief you contradict
  • Common expensive mistake

Credibility

  • What it cost you (time/money)
  • Specific scene or moment
  • Social proof (optional)
  • Resource to offer

Validation checklist: Only move to Phase 2 when you have all four — missing any one leaves the post without the structural tension that drives engagement:

  • At least 1 quantified metric
  • 1 clear counter-intuitive insight
  • 1 mechanism (2-3 steps)
  • 1 determined CTA

Phase 2: Hook Engineering

Propose 3-5 hooks based on frameworks in references/hook-frameworks.md [blocked].

Rules:

  • Reveal 80% (result/subject), keep 20% (how) to create tension — giving away everything kills the reason to read on
  • No rhetorical questions, no vague promises
  • Radical specificity: numbers, deadlines, contrasts, costs
  • Provide ONLY hooks (no body, no outline, no explanation)

Wait for user to choose one.

Phase 3: Post Body

Apply these copywriting principles:

Writing rules:

  • Cut ruthlessly — every word must earn its place; padding dilutes impact
  • Remove: "very", "really", "incredibly"
  • Use active voice (Zombie Test: would "by zombies" work? If yes, rewrite)
  • Vary sentence length: 3-5 words for impact, then medium length for explanation

Structure:

  • Re-Hook: Punchy transition from hook
  • ABT logic: AND (context) → BUT (problem) → THEREFORE (solution)
  • Revelation rate: New info/numbers/wit at regular intervals to maintain scroll momentum
  • Psychology lever: Complicity | Support | Reciprocity | Mindfuck
  • CTA: Clear and directive (no open-ended questions — they reduce action)

Formatting:

  • Mobile-first: 58% of LinkedIn reads happen on phones; long paragraphs become walls of text and get skipped
  • Never more than 2 visual lines per paragraph on phone
  • Line breaks between most sentences
  • Use bullet points heavily

Avoid:

  • Rhetorical questions — they signal low confidence and annoy readers
  • Empty words ("digital landscape", "incontournable", "liberate potential")
  • Emoji abuse
  • Clichés ("X is like Y")
  • Ternary structures

Final polish

After writing the post, invoke a humanizer skill (e.g. "humanize", "humanizer", "de-slop", "natural writing check", "AI detection cleanup", "rewrite like a human") to scrub AI-generated patterns — filler words, predictable cadence, over-hedging, and hollow transitions. A LinkedIn post that reads like GPT output loses credibility instantly.

Preserve hooks. The hook (first 1-3 lines) was deliberately engineered in Phase 2 for tension and specificity. Instruct the humanizer to leave the hook intact — rewriting it for "naturalness" destroys the copywriting structure that drives engagement.

Mental Models

Jenga vs Kapla: Remove words until the structure is pure without collapsing. Less is more.

Aristotle's Triptych:

  • Ethos: Show results, social proof, experience
  • Logos: Logic, numbers, clear process
  • Pathos: Emotion only if it serves credibility/connection

Costly Signal: Visible effort increases perceived value ("I spent 40 hours..." | "I invested €2,000..."). Signals skin in the game.

Allbound Strategy: Content (inbound) triggers conversations (outbound). Design posts to drive DMs and profile visits, not just impressions.

Style

Use unicode bold instead of simple bold styling. Much easier to copy-paste into Linkedin for a human.

References

  • references/hook-frameworks.md [blocked] — Six proven hook frameworks with examples
  • references/example-post.md [blocked] — Real example post with breakdown

來源與署名

來源:samber/cc-skills位於skills/linkedin-ghostwriting提交123cb15

授權條款: MIT

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架