Content Audit

social-media-skills/skills/skills/content-audit

作者 social-media-skills6e30eeb2f6736bda8683b6bbaa674af3641d7945無授權條款收錄於 2026年10月9日更新於 2026年10月9日

Audit an existing social media account and its content — the retrospective reality-check of what's working and what isn't. Use when someone wants to "audit my content/account," "what's working and what isn't," "clean up my profile/feed," "I post a lot but it's not working," or to triage an existing account before replanning. Produces a keep/kill/refresh triage, maps pillar coverage, catches voice drift, and fixes profile fundamentals — then a quick-wins-vs-long-term roadmap. Uses the AUDIT framework. Reads brand-profile + content-pillars + social-strategy (the plan) and analytics-and-reporting (the data) first. It reads native analytics (WoopSocial has none), scores on signal not vanity, recommends rather than auto-deletes, and never fabricates. Feeds content-recycling, content-pillars, profile-optimization, voice-builder, and social-strategy. Distinct from analytics-and-reporting (ongoing measurement) and competitor-analysis (rivals).

AI 產生的概覽

稽核現有社群媒體帳號及其內容,產出保留/淘汰/翻新的分類結果與路線圖。

功能
此技能使用 AUDIT 框架,對現有社群媒體帳號進行回顧性稽核。它彙整約 90 天的產出與原生分析資料,依訊號而非虛榮指標評分,並診斷內容支柱涵蓋度、語氣漂移與個人檔案基本要素。它產出保留/淘汰/翻新分類,以及分為速效成果與長期項目的優勢、弱勢與機會路線圖,並將發現交給相關規劃技能。它只提出建議而不自動執行,且絕不捏造指標。
適用情境
適用於有人想稽核其內容或帳號、詢問哪些做法有效哪些無效、想整理個人檔案或動態牆,或覺得自己發了很多卻沒效果時。也適合在重新規劃前對現有帳號做分類梳理。這是回顧性診斷,不同於持續量測或競品分析。
執行需求
沒有指令碼,僅為說明性內容。依賴使用者提供原生分析資料,並依賴品牌輪廓、語氣、內容支柱、社群策略與分析報告等相關技能。資料不足時僅能進行結構性稽核。

content-audit

The retrospective bridge — read how an existing account has performed and turn it into a keep/kill/ refresh roadmap that feeds the forward plan. It reads (via analytics-and-reporting) and recommends; the human and other skills act.

The POV: activity isn't progress

Plenty of accounts look busy — daily reels, carousels, likes trickling in, followers inching up — while nothing actually moves. A content audit finds the signal under the busy-ness: what gets saved and shared (not just liked), which pillars are starved or bloated, where the voice has drifted (or where your winners say it should evolve), and which profile fundamentals quietly leak followers. Strategy is forward-looking; the audit is the retrospective reality-check that informs it.

Read these first

  1. brand-profile + voice-builder — the voice/brand standard to audit against.
  2. content-pillars + social-strategy — the intended plan (the audit checks execution of it).
  3. analytics-and-reporting — the performance data source (native analytics; WoopSocial has none).

The framework: AUDIT

(Depth: references/the-audit-framework.md.)

  • A — Assemble the inventory: ~90 days of output by platform/format/pillar/time + native metrics; pull the plan you're auditing against.
  • U — Uncover the signal: score on saves/shares/replies + the goal-mapped KPI (not vanity); surface top/bottom performers + patterns by format/time/pillar.
  • D — Diagnose pillars, voice & profile: pillar whitespace (→ content-pillars); voice drift both ways (→ voice-builder); profile fundamentals + cadence (→ profile-optimization).
  • I — Iterate: keep / kill / refresh: scale winners (→ content-recycling), cut chronic/off-brand/ non-native, refresh good-but-dated. Refresh before kill; human approves kills.
  • T — Turn into a roadmap: strengths/weaknesses/opportunities; quick wins vs long-term; owners + timelines; hand off. No spreadsheet graveyard.

The method (verify specifics quarterly)

Audit = retrospective (vs forward strategy); signal-over-vanity; keep/kill/refresh; pillar whitespace; voice drift both ways; profile fundamentals; ~90-day window; quarterly deep + monthly light; run after major changes: references/content-audit-2026-reality.md. Triage rules, scorecard + worked examples: references/triage-and-recipes.md.

Honest scope (never violate)

  • Retrospective, not strategy — triages the past; social-strategy plans the future.
  • Reads native analytics (WoopSocial has none) via analytics-and-reporting; interprets numbers the user provides — never fabricates a metric or a coverage map.
  • Signal not vanity — low likes is not a kill criterion.
  • Recommend, don't auto-act — never auto-delete (a human approves kills; deleting can lose evergreen/SEO value + history); refresh before kill; some profile edits are in-app/human.
  • Thin data → structural audit only (profile/pillars/voice/cadence + baseline); revisit performance triage at ~90 days. (Scope, bridge role + connections: references/scope-and-connections.md.)

Distinct from its siblings (route correctly)

content-audit (this) = periodic retrospective triage of YOUR account · analytics-and-reporting = ongoing measurement (the data source) · competitor-analysis = rivals' public side · social-strategy = the forward plan this informs · content-recycling = scales/refreshes the winners this surfaces · profile-optimization = executes the profile fixes this flags.

Where this connects

Reads first: brand-profile, voice-builder, content-pillars, social-strategy, analytics-and-reporting. Hands findings to: content-recycling, content-pillars, profile-optimization, voice-builder, social-strategy, experimentation. Benchmark context: competitor-analysis, goals-and-kpis. Per-platform format/native expectations: the per-platform *-growth skills. No publishing/tool surface — a diagnostic + planning skill.

Definition of done

A ~90-day inventory scored on signal (not vanity) from native analytics the user provided (nothing fabricated); pillar whitespace, voice drift (both ways), profile fundamentals, and cadence diagnosed; a keep/kill/refresh triage (refresh before kill; kills human-approved, none auto-deleted); a strengths/ weaknesses/opportunities roadmap split into quick wins vs long-term with owners + timelines, handed to content-recycling/content-pillars/profile-optimization/voice-builder/social-strategy; thin-data accounts get a structural audit + baseline instead; correctly distinguished from analytics-and-reporting, competitor-analysis, and social-strategy.

來源與署名

來源:social-media-skills/skills位於skills/content-audit提交6e30eeb

授權條款: 無授權條款

內容歸原作者所有。SourceWeft 從公開儲存庫中收錄這些內容。

檢舉或申請下架